INTENSITY²

Start here => Games => Topic started by: Queen Victoria on July 08, 2012, 11:50:52 PM

Title: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on July 08, 2012, 11:50:52 PM
I could write a book.  First four:

1)  It's complexioned, not complected.  Fair complexioned, not fair complected.

2)  Between = choice of two, Among = choice of more than two.
Between Tom and Harry, Harry is the nerd.
Among Tom, Dick, and Harry, Harry is the Nerd.

3)  Brunette means black haired, brownette means brown haired.

4)  A male is blond, a female is blonde.

The Queen hath spoken and is allsome.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on July 09, 2012, 01:16:52 AM
I never knew that about blond/e, I just always thought it was spelt with an e on the end.

My absolute pet peeve is the plural word written with an apostrophe when there is no need for it. Such as banana's instead of bananas. Or DVD's instead of DVDs. There are a few examples around town that I should take photos of and put up here.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on July 09, 2012, 05:29:08 AM
I didn't know the word brownette, nor did I know the meaning of brunette.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: midlifeaspie on July 09, 2012, 09:18:22 AM
Your vs you're.

Pretty much everything Ricky writes  :autism:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Icequeen on July 09, 2012, 09:38:35 AM
Quote
Noun
 
brunette
1.brunette (a girl or woman with brown or black hair)



I've always used brunette to describe someone with brown hair :LOL: (I always went by the descriptions on the dye boxes  :thumbup:) , the true definition itself if you read it is misleading, because it says brown OR black. Usually if someone had black hair, I referred to them as "raven-haired".

Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 09, 2012, 09:55:44 AM
In old English house is always a verb. The noun is hous.

The original 2 person singularis of be is not thou art but thou beest.

 8)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Frolic_Fun on July 09, 2012, 11:01:38 AM
"rediculous"

It's RIDICULOUS, cuntstick.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on July 09, 2012, 09:17:41 PM
Spot the mistake:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 10, 2012, 12:28:59 AM
There is at least a period missing.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on July 10, 2012, 01:37:56 AM
A comma, actually.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 10, 2012, 03:32:56 AM
Oh, I meant a comma  :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Frolic_Fun on July 10, 2012, 07:17:39 AM
I'd probably more likely use a semicolon.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Parts on July 10, 2012, 12:54:57 PM
Grammar, spelling yuck :zombiefuck:  I was never good at either and am very tolerant of mistakes
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 12, 2012, 09:49:47 AM
Grammar, spelling yuck :zombiefuck:  I was never good at either and am very tolerant of mistakes

It's fascinating. Originally they didn't use punctuation or anything. Like this: itsfascinatingoriginallytheydidntusepunctuationoranythinglikethis

Then the Romans started to have "half-high" periods. Later, in the Middle Age, they invented more and more symbols and writing rules. The most advanced punctuation today is probably in German.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on July 12, 2012, 03:16:57 PM
There are written languages today that do not use spaces.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 12, 2012, 03:20:09 PM
Thatisbraveofthemidsay
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on July 12, 2012, 03:37:21 PM
Very brave indeed. It's a bitch to typeset and layout such scripts if you don't know the language, but there are ways to automate it.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 12, 2012, 04:01:49 PM
Welltheromansdiditmanuallybutthenagaintheywereveryverybraveindeedthoseromans
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on July 12, 2012, 04:10:56 PM
ANDWRITINGINCAPITALSWASDEFAULTTOOTOENHANCETHEVISUALEFFECT
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 12, 2012, 04:12:13 PM
YESTHEYCERTAINLYHADAFEELINGFORGREATNESSTHEROMANS
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on July 12, 2012, 04:15:53 PM
THEGREEKWEREBRAVEONCAPITALISINGANDNOTUSINGSPACESTOOTHEROMANSDIDNOTMINDTHOSEINFLUENCESFROMGRAECIAATALLITISABUGGERTOREEDTHOUGH
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 12, 2012, 04:18:31 PM
IFYOUWANTTOBEBRAVEYOUSIMPLYDONTMINDPETTYTHINGSLIKEREADINGDIFFICULTIESIMAGINEJULIUSCAESARMINDINGREADINGDIFFICULTIESHOWBRAVEWOULDTHATHAVEBEEN
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on July 12, 2012, 11:05:57 PM
He could get a high educated slave to read it for him.
Those Romans did automatise things, by using non civilians.  :M
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on July 13, 2012, 02:25:35 AM
Middle Egyptian scripts had no vowels.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 13, 2012, 02:38:29 AM
Having only consonants is  :viking:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on July 13, 2012, 02:39:32 AM
Problem is, with dead languages like that nobody knows how they actually sounded.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: bodie on July 13, 2012, 03:33:44 AM
universal hand signals work well!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 13, 2012, 03:38:09 AM
Not necessarily. The gesture we use for "OK" in the West means "shit" or "fuck" in some parts of the world.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: bodie on July 13, 2012, 03:48:52 AM
Not necessarily. The gesture we use for "OK" in the West means "shit" or "fuck" in some parts of the world.

Even better :viking:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 13, 2012, 04:10:42 AM
Languages are like LEGO; many pieces fit together at random but not all.

For instance the Swedish verb måla. It's about 100% coterminous with the English verb "paint". But the Swedish verb färga is not 100% coterminous with the English verb "colour". In English you also have a verb "dye" for that.

Or the other way around: the English word "grandfather" could be considered to be only 50% coterminous with any Swedish word, because there is one Swedish word for paternal grandfather and one for maternal.

Or the word "brave"  8) In German brav might mean "brave" as in English, but it's also another word for "good". Swedish bra and Italian brava only mean "good".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: El on July 13, 2012, 05:49:57 AM
Proper use of its vs it's.  One of our bigger resident grammar nazis consistently confuses them.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 13, 2012, 05:56:54 AM
Anglicus qualibet una inepta lingua  8)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on July 13, 2012, 10:23:35 AM
Having only consonants is  :viking:

Hebrew has no vowels either.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on July 13, 2012, 10:25:59 AM
I've read that "shit" in pidgin English is "Ash belong-um fire."

"Nice" originally meant "stupid."
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on July 13, 2012, 10:43:19 AM
"School" originally meant "free time", because only those who didn't have to work for their living had time to study. Unlike in many other languages Swedish semester still means "paid holiday" (it literally means "six months", though).
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on September 29, 2012, 08:28:50 PM
This signwriter should be ashamed of themselves:
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/bananas.jpg)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on September 29, 2012, 08:32:23 PM
Having only consonants is  :viking:

  Welsh words seem to have 8 or 9 consonants in a row!   :viking:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Bastet on September 29, 2012, 09:57:01 PM
overuse of double negatives

"You don't know nothing"
"No it don't"

FUCK!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Adam on September 30, 2012, 07:41:56 AM
Your / you're

and same as renaeden - apostrophes where the shouldn't be

lazy spelling/grammar doesn't bother me (ie not using apostrophes when there should be one , or "tho" instead of "though" - i do that all the time on the internet), but otherwise it's annoying
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on September 30, 2012, 11:52:25 AM
One grammar peeve is "got."  "I've got to.....", just seems to grate on my ears.  Unfortunately, I use it too often and my ears hurt too much.  From what I've read there's no consensus on whether it's grammatical, but it doesn't seem proper to me.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: P7PSP on September 30, 2012, 12:25:07 PM
One grammar peeve is "got."  "I've got to.....", just seems to grate on my ears.  Unfortunately, I use it too often and my ears hurt too much.  From what I've read there's no consensus on whether it's grammatical, but it doesn't seem proper to me.
How about The Four Tops singing Ain't No Woman Like The One Eyed Gott?  :zoinks: That made no sense to me.   :tard:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: skyblue1 on September 30, 2012, 12:39:04 PM
One grammar peeve is "got."  "I've got to.....", just seems to grate on my ears.  Unfortunately, I use it too often and my ears hurt too much.  From what I've read there's no consensus on whether it's grammatical, but it doesn't seem proper to me.
How about The Four Tops singing Ain't No Woman Like The One Eyed Gott?  :zoinks: That made no sense to me.   :tard:
I got nothing
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on September 30, 2012, 01:45:42 PM
The way some say "none of us ARE".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Adam on September 30, 2012, 03:17:49 PM
This signwriter should be ashamed of themselves:
-------------[/img]

The apostrophe thing is even more common with acromyms for some reason. As if people just can't accept that big letters have a small letter after them without an apostrophe in between :P

bad grammar doesn't bother me at all. Online I mean. In an essay it would be different, but on internet forums I type pretty much how I'd speak. So I would probably put "none of us are" because that's what I'd say in conversation with someone

It's when people add something that shouldn't be there (ie got it wrong out of ignorance rather than laziness) that it bothers me. I know that's kinda asshole-ish. Which is why I try not to comment on grammar/punctuation mistakes as it shouldn't matter. Plus we all make them. Even people who are great at spelling and usually very careful about it all - you're bound to slip up sometimes.

It's weird how almost all of us have at least one or two grammar/punctuation pet peeves though.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on September 30, 2012, 03:20:15 PM
VIN number = Vehicle Identification Number number
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Adam on September 30, 2012, 03:21:46 PM
PIN number and ATM machine are other common ones
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on September 30, 2012, 03:24:00 PM
a self-addressed envelope.  it should be pre-addressed because an envelope can't address itself
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on September 30, 2012, 03:52:33 PM
Why do you have that stupid 's or s' for genitive in English?  :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Bastet on September 30, 2012, 08:36:20 PM
netspeak
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on September 30, 2012, 08:36:43 PM
One grammar peeve is "got."  "I've got to.....", just seems to grate on my ears.  Unfortunately, I use it too often and my ears hurt too much.  From what I've read there's no consensus on whether it's grammatical, but it doesn't seem proper to me.
Should it be "I have to..."? That is what I say anyway.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on September 30, 2012, 08:38:19 PM
One grammar peeve is "got."  "I've got to.....", just seems to grate on my ears.  Unfortunately, I use it too often and my ears hurt too much.  From what I've read there's no consensus on whether it's grammatical, but it doesn't seem proper to me.
Should it be "I have to..."? That is what I say anyway.

Yes, it should.  Perhaps people forget that the 've is have.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on October 01, 2012, 06:03:40 AM
One grammar peeve is "got."  "I've got to.....", just seems to grate on my ears.  Unfortunately, I use it too often and my ears hurt too much.  From what I've read there's no consensus on whether it's grammatical, but it doesn't seem proper to me.
Should it be "I have to..."? That is what I say anyway.

Yes, it should.  Perhaps people forget that the 've is have.

I wonder if it is a regional thing, in origin, to say "I have got to ..... ".
In some regions of the Netherlands, people say things like "Ik doe even koffie zetten". To me it sounds wrong, for them it is how it should be. (Do they talk like that where you live, Lutra?)

Dutch pet peeve, when it comes to grammar: Je moet je wel beseffen dat....... Aaaaaarrrrccchhhhhhhh. Beseffen is geen wederkerig werkwoord.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: lutra on October 01, 2012, 06:55:32 AM
^ Dunno.. if some say such. Here they say stuff like: jot, nut, hullie, zullie, ge-/worre, da wit oe wel eej, agge mahr leut et, hedde gij, etc....  :autism:

Plus, folks here (the inbred Berregenaeren) tend to end their sentence with 'eej(?)' a LOT. It's frikkin' disgusting.

Denk wel nu (on the plus-side again).. dat ik efkes 'n bakkie ga 'doen'.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: midlifeaspie on October 01, 2012, 11:26:41 AM
This signwriter should be ashamed of themselves:
-------------[/img]

The apostrophe thing is even more common with acromyms for some reason. As if people just can't accept that big letters have a small letter after them without an apostrophe in between :P

bad grammar doesn't bother me at all. Online I mean. In an essay it would be different, but on internet forums I type pretty much how I'd speak. So I would probably put "none of us are" because that's what I'd say in conversation with someone

It's when people add something that shouldn't be there (ie got it wrong out of ignorance rather than laziness) that it bothers me. I know that's kinda asshole-ish. Which is why I try not to comment on grammar/punctuation mistakes as it shouldn't matter. Plus we all make them. Even people who are great at spelling and usually very careful about it all - you're bound to slip up sometimes.

It's weird how almost all of us have at least one or two grammar/punctuation pet peeves though.

I just assumed that character on top of the shack was named Choc Banana, and this was his shack.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on October 01, 2012, 11:54:32 AM
Let me compare my local dialect with English and with standard Swedish:

hose - slang - schlång
fish- fisk - fesk
nag - tjata - tjôta
much - mycket - möe(t)
worn out - sliten - schleten
glasses - glasögon - glasöger
key - nyckel - nöckel
head - huvud - hôvve

 :laugh:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 01, 2012, 09:05:41 PM
People who write "could of" instead of "could have". I guess they think since it is said "could've" that it is "of", not a shortened version of "have".

My sister has done this in various forms in texts to me 3 times. Her kids are homeschooled and she teaches them so she should know better.

I found on The Oatmeal "10 Words You Need to Stop Misspelling":
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling (http://theoatmeal.com/comics/misspelling)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on October 01, 2012, 11:13:59 PM
You must kill the offenders! :arrr:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 02, 2012, 12:14:51 AM
Also, people who say "irregardless". There is no such word!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Adam on October 02, 2012, 12:19:53 PM
People who write "could of" instead of "could have".

omg I forgot that. that's the one I hate the most lol
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: midlifeaspie on October 02, 2012, 12:24:05 PM
People who "went" instead of "said"
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 02, 2012, 08:57:28 PM
People who say "yeah, no". It is becoming common here in Australia for people to say this and it sounds like they can't make up their minds.

When people write "you've got another thing coming". Instead it is "another think coming".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on October 03, 2012, 03:31:58 PM
People who say "yeah, no". It is becoming common here in Australia for people to say this and it sounds like they can't make up their minds.

When people write "you've got another thing coming". Instead it is "another think coming".

Maybe they announce the rare fact, for them, of "another thought coming" up.   :zoinks:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: bodie on October 03, 2012, 03:54:22 PM
a self-addressed envelope.  it should be pre-addressed because an envelope can't address itself

when i see  'SAE' i always assumed it referred to stamped addressed envelope and not self.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: P7PSP on October 03, 2012, 04:17:10 PM
People who say "yeah, no". It is becoming common here in Australia for people to say this and it sounds like they can't make up their minds.

When people write "you've got another thing coming". Instead it is "another think coming".
I could of done without hearing that myself. irregardless people keep saying it.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TA on October 03, 2012, 04:28:41 PM
Using "u" and "ur" for "you", "your" and "you're", and most chat speak in general.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Parts on October 03, 2012, 04:32:39 PM
a self-addressed envelope.  it should be pre-addressed because an envelope can't address itself

when i see  'SAE' i always assumed it referred to stamped addressed envelope and not self.

When I see SAE I think motor oil      :fixin: :nerdy:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Callaway on October 03, 2012, 04:49:57 PM
People who say "yeah, no". It is becoming common here in Australia for people to say this and it sounds like they can't make up their minds.

When people write "you've got another thing coming". Instead it is "another think coming".
I could of done without hearing that myself. irregardless people keep saying it.

Well, if you think that, you've another thing coming.

 :laugh:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 03, 2012, 11:35:43 PM
 :headexplode:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Callaway on October 04, 2012, 03:01:00 AM
:headexplode:

Quote
Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves

I have to say that if I had a pet that used improper grammar and misspelled words, I wouldn't be peeved at all, I would be thrilled.

 :laugh:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 04, 2012, 03:59:08 AM
u guys gettin' 2 srs over among spling n grama your m'king 2 biga dheal its no probl'm I got gud enuf skilz c? if u expeck moor you hve anuter thing cumming; i culd of rote beya bhut nope i got no car 2 who so... Nun of us are gettin' aney yunger

wat is scarry his twat u problemly understoold hull tat sssloter of d englsh langerage welcum to da futa of ow pleple wil wrote sunday

buydawy\ i luv danana's thay so gud I got 2 buy moor i also want b blonde 2 blewnets are 2 broun that remembers me i ned moneys from the ATM macsheen;
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: bodie on October 04, 2012, 05:16:14 AM
'you're not wrong are you'

 :evillaugh:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on October 04, 2012, 09:22:31 AM
People who say "yeah, no". It is becoming common here in Australia for people to say this and it sounds like they can't make up their minds.

When people write "you've got another thing coming". Instead it is "another think coming".
I could of done without hearing that myself. irregardless people keep saying it.

:rofl:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TA on October 05, 2012, 04:53:14 PM
u guys gettin' 2 srs over among spling n grama your m'king 2 biga dheal its no probl'm I got gud enuf skilz c? if u expeck moor you hve anuter thing cumming; i culd of rote beya bhut nope i got no car 2 who so... Nun of us are gettin' aney yunger

wat is scarry his twat u problemly understoold hull tat sssloter of d englsh langerage welcum to da futa of ow pleple wil wrote sunday

buydawy\ i luv danana's thay so gud I got 2 buy moor i also want b blonde 2 blewnets are 2 broun that remembers me i ned moneys from the ATM macsheen;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_mDTLphIVY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_mDTLphIVY)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: midlifeaspie on October 06, 2012, 03:48:32 PM
u guys gettin' 2 srs over among spling n grama your m'king 2 biga dheal its no probl'm I got gud enuf skilz c? if u expeck moor you hve anuter thing cumming; i culd of rote beya bhut nope i got no car 2 who so... Nun of us are gettin' aney yunger

wat is scarry his twat u problemly understoold hull tat sssloter of d englsh langerage welcum to da futa of ow pleple wil wrote sunday

buydawy\ i luv danana's thay so gud I got 2 buy moor i also want b blonde 2 blewnets are 2 broun that remembers me i ned moneys from the ATM macsheen;

Ricky?  Is that you?
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 06, 2012, 09:56:59 PM
u wot thnk i him?
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 09, 2012, 07:21:17 PM
A couple I have seen on here:

Weather instead of whether.
Who's instead of whose.

Come on people! You should know better! :police:

Another:

Aloud instead of allowed. I saw it on Facebook.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Parts on November 09, 2012, 07:51:37 PM
I don't think I have any.  Grammar and spelling are somewhat alien to me and I struggle with it on most posts. In the past it has been one of the things that discouraged me from posting on forums and it still keeps me out of chats.   So as long I can understand the meaning of a post very little bothers me
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on November 09, 2012, 08:23:42 PM
I don't think I have any.  Grammar and spelling are somewhat alien to me and I struggle with it on most posts. In the past it has been one of the things that discouraged me from posting on forums and it still keeps me out of chats.   So as long I can understand the meaning of a post very little bothers me

  I like your posting style, you come across as a funny guy.  :green:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on November 10, 2012, 04:15:22 AM
I don't think I have any.  Grammar and spelling are somewhat alien to me and I struggle with it on most posts. In the past it has been one of the things that discouraged me from posting on forums and it still keeps me out of chats.   So as long I can understand the meaning of a post very little bothers me

  I like your posting style, you come across as a funny guy.  :green:

:agreed:

Parts is BRAVE.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: bodie on November 10, 2012, 05:25:52 AM
He is.  Especially when he likens the BBC to big black cocks :o
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 16, 2012, 12:43:34 AM
Argh.
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20121116_125824.jpg)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on November 16, 2012, 05:22:29 AM
Go on, kick that sign. You know you want to.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Parts on November 16, 2012, 07:05:59 PM
I find errors on professionally produced things amusing 
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: TheoK on November 16, 2012, 07:14:09 PM
I find errors on professionally produced things amusing

Ditto.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on January 28, 2013, 07:35:57 PM
See if you can spot it - it is on the orange sign. And on the black sign, isn't it meant to be espresso?
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20130122_125016.jpg)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on January 28, 2013, 11:21:21 PM
The menu board reads like chapter headings from a porn book.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: midlifeaspie on January 29, 2013, 09:16:41 AM
Possessive use of s on "coffee" :)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on January 29, 2013, 09:13:03 PM
Possessive use of s on "coffee" :)

My post was in addition to the possessive and misspelling.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: corona76 on January 29, 2013, 11:06:06 PM
speling iz ova rayted enee waiy. ..their...I sed it...
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on January 30, 2013, 10:54:16 AM
speling iz ova rayted enee waiy. ..their...I sed it...

weonhg eo clenwot ooe sqmf.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on January 30, 2013, 03:40:34 PM
wa zeg ie?????
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on January 30, 2013, 09:58:55 PM
Spelling is essential as is grammar (and grampa). I have no idea what I spelled.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 16, 2013, 08:15:27 AM
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/c87bc560-443e-4a47-be84-28fc409f51a7_zpsd3c9bb1c.jpg) (http://s129.photobucket.com/user/renaeden/media/c87bc560-443e-4a47-be84-28fc409f51a7_zpsd3c9bb1c.jpg.html)

(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/935020_674862539209747_673183163_n_zps6b9524eb.png) (http://s129.photobucket.com/user/renaeden/media/935020_674862539209747_673183163_n_zps6b9524eb.png.html)

(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20130730_161911_zpsb5f7467d.jpg) (http://s129.photobucket.com/user/renaeden/media/20130730_161911_zpsb5f7467d.jpg.html)

(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20130625_110909_zps65432e0b.jpg) (http://s129.photobucket.com/user/renaeden/media/20130625_110909_zps65432e0b.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Bastet on November 18, 2013, 03:53:48 PM
Randy cured me of my spelling and grammar pet peeves.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 25, 2013, 12:59:58 AM
Not a problem with spelling but...
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20131123_140358_zpsd5c794a8.jpg) (http://s129.photobucket.com/user/renaeden/media/20131123_140358_zpsd5c794a8.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on November 26, 2013, 12:03:13 AM
You've got to love those google translations.

There's a Chinese HiFi company called FiiO. They make some very affordable and surprisingly good headphone amps. Their gear is fabulous, with great components and a sturdy feel. Quality, in other words.

But their manuals are terrible, to the point where I have seriously contemplated contacting them and offering to write their documentation for free, just because I love their products. I'm pretty sure they write the manuals in Chinese and then do a basic translation using Google, after which some poor sod will have to try to clean up the mess.

It never works.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on November 27, 2013, 01:35:37 AM
affect vs effect
too two to
their they're there
are vs our (are house is painted green)


I once lived in Massachusetts on a street where they combined the street name with a road sign:

Graves Ave
Dead End
Now they say no outlet but I haven't been back to see if they changed that one.

I have tons of these from grading papers but one of my favorites is from Turnitin, a plagiarism checking site:
Tracred by (my name)

A student writing an essay on African Americans:
"Their language is Ebonics which they seem to speak like"

Your spell checker is your enemy:
I was never allowed to have any black fiends
A discrimination to other groups is indigence
what you know and use too is a form of dissemination
they have an unflavored opinion of people
HIV is known as the lent virus
that is a good example of musculinity
He began to suffer from lunge disease
the loss took a hug toll on him
my aunt past away last summer

Student excuses and complaints:
the questions that I did not answer on my assignment were not there for me to answer.
I don't know why you done mark me down on grammer.
I had a dust bunny in my eye during the quiz

And my all time favorite definition of the Quran
"Quran was a man who lived in the middle east 1400 years ago."

I am grading final papers now; now you are suffering with me.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 27, 2013, 01:43:06 AM
The uni I go to also uses Turnitin. The top three you listed are pet hates of mine. I have never seen number four though (our vs are), those two words are not said the same here.

Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: conlang returns on November 28, 2013, 03:33:16 AM
It think it's really worst when the person clearly didn't care, and simply did the same thing over and over again for four fucking pages.  People with an honestly poor grasp of English can be forgiven.  But dude, I've heard you fucking speak.  You obviously grew up with this language.  I know that you know better.  Now quit being an asshole and proofread. 
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Jack on November 28, 2013, 08:36:01 AM
Have the spelling ability of a seventh grader; sometimes wish I had the guts to simply not care.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 29, 2013, 02:27:28 AM
^I would say you can spell better than a seventh grader, better than some of the people I go to uni with.

I remember a girl wanted me to hand her assignment in the next day along with mine. I agreed to. I took a sneaky peek at her assignment that night and boy, there were a fair few spelling mistakes.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Jack on November 29, 2013, 03:15:26 AM
^I would say you can spell better than a seventh grader, better than some of the people I go to uni with.

I remember a girl wanted me to hand her assignment in the next day along with mine. I agreed to. I took a sneaky peek at her assignment that night and boy, there were a fair few spelling mistakes.

Yes, seventh grader; know this for certain. Spell check is my friend. :)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 29, 2013, 05:17:16 AM
Well, at least you know to use it. :)  I have used it (weird but my spelling is getting worse as I get older) but I still spot mistakes from a mile away.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on December 18, 2013, 07:12:59 PM
actually seventh grade is pretty good. The NY Times is, I believe, done in 8th grade English - oh, what the snobs who read it don't know! It used to be 6th grade. Either they've improved or our standards have been lowered.

I might have said it before, but 'way back when, I was grading tests for my mom and studying for the graduate record exam - they look at that to see if you're smart enough for grad school. What a shocker to find words on her test that were on my vocabulary list. What was she teaching? Third grade. She said those words were standard third grade, from her teacher's prep books.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: RageBeoulve on December 18, 2013, 07:21:47 PM
In A.D 2101

War was beginning.

Captain: What happen ?

Mechanic: Somebody set up us
          the bomb.

Operator: We get signal.

Captain: What !

Operator: Main screen turn on.

Captain: It's you !!

CATS: How are you gentlemen !!
      All your base are belong
      to us.
      You are on the way to
      destruction.

Captain: What you say !!

CATS: You have no chance to
      survive make your time.
      HA HA HA HA....

Operator: Captain !!

Captain: Take off every 'zig'!!
         You know what you doing.
         Move 'zig'.
         For great justice.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on December 18, 2013, 11:53:49 PM
Quote from: http://www.davidpbrown.co.uk/jokes/european-commission.html
The European Commission has announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the EU, rather than German, which was the other contender. Her Majesty's Government conceded that English spelling had room for improvement and has therefore accepted a five-year phasing in of "Euro-English".

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make sivil servants jump for joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of the "k", Which should klear up some konfusion and allow one key less on keyboards.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year, when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f", making words like "fotograf" 20% shorter.

In the third year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horible mes of the silent "e" is disgrasful.

By the fourth yer, peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v".

During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and similar changes vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters. After zis fifz yer, ve vil hav a reli sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubls or difikultis and everivun vil find it ezi to understand ech ozer. ZE DREM VIL FINALI COM TRU!

Herr Schmidt
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on January 21, 2014, 01:39:45 AM
^Bloody hell, that is terrible!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on January 21, 2014, 02:16:39 AM
 :lol1:

Everytime I read that, the sound of the language changes more and more to that of the Germans in Allo Allo. Allo Allo - Helga Undresses (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5PBF-AWPWg#)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on January 24, 2014, 12:26:45 PM
It iz vondeful.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on January 24, 2014, 12:35:21 PM
"Houw nais all zeez kidz in ze zoo."

Something like that was the spelling in a story I read long long ago, about two Dutch kids hearing some tourist talk.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on February 10, 2014, 11:44:56 PM
If you use the plural form, DO NOT USE THE APOSTROPHE! :GA:

It's "things", not "thing's".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on April 22, 2014, 08:36:47 AM
Found on amazon.com:

A Few Spays In The Mouth Can Keep Your Dogs Teeth Clean And Free From Infection
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on August 15, 2014, 08:20:00 AM
Not just once but twice:(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20140217_083725_zpsspzgrlg6.jpg)

I actually scratched the apostrophe off this sign, you can just see it:
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20130602_130324_zpsa3a6f4d7.jpg)

Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on August 23, 2014, 03:34:58 AM
You must kill them all! :arrr:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 28, 2014, 05:44:21 AM
Anyone for grapfruit?
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/Mobile%20Uploads/20140225_114524_zpsmmw72nnv.jpg?1417169087524&1417169089004)

You would think a hospital would know better.
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/Mobile%20Uploads/20140724_141235_zpsr5l0prty.jpg?1417169087524&1417169089004)

I used to go to this gym.
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/Mobile%20Uploads/20140806_171733_zpsvogrukfx.jpg?1417169087525&1417169089004)

(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20130605_083708_zpslla5dlxn.jpg?1417169087525&1417169089005)

(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/Mobile%20Uploads/20140828_120020_zpswlzjtoqw.jpg?1417169087525&1417169089004)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on November 30, 2014, 12:12:20 PM
I knew I shouldn't have read this thread. :GA:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on July 08, 2016, 11:50:34 PM
New peeve: writing breath instead of breathe.  :GA:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on July 09, 2016, 08:15:50 AM
New peeve: writing breath instead of breathe.  :GA:

 :paperbag:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on July 10, 2016, 03:01:37 AM
New peeve: writing breath instead of breathe.  :GA:

 :paperbag:
Yes, I saw that! But what made me write that post was my friend who texts me a lot and she made that mistake 3 times, even after I corrected her the first time. Argh!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on July 10, 2016, 08:46:11 AM
In grammar school, I would leave the "e" off of "the."
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on July 10, 2016, 09:07:23 PM
I used to catch myself writing "thay" instead of "they".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 05, 2016, 03:07:24 AM
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/0b495411-c2b3-420c-8603-095a9d91bf89_zpsgqreav7e.jpg)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 05, 2016, 03:10:33 AM
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20141218_082244_zpshshbz4w3.jpg)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on October 05, 2016, 05:04:04 AM
  Probably an autocorrect issue, but so many people online seem to misspell "barely" as "barley."   :get: :lol2:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 05, 2016, 08:48:06 PM
My phone doesn't autocorrect, so I am glad I don't have to watch that. My Kindle does though, so any unusual words have to be watched because a number of times I have submitted a post only to see a "corrected" word that is totally wrong!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 07, 2016, 10:48:17 PM
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/IMG_241985079291484_zpsv99ed8yf.jpg)

(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/IMG_742257561865510_zps5khhqjwy.jpg)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 08, 2016, 12:00:10 AM
One of my pet peeves is using an adjective rather than an adverb when modifying a verb.  The PR has heard me complain and comment on this that she uses the adverb correctly. 
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on October 08, 2016, 12:29:49 AM
One of my pet peeves is using an adjective rather than an adverb when modifying a verb.  The PR has heard me complain and comment on this that she uses the adverb correctly.
I missed out on learning about adverbs, adjectives, etc. when I was in school as I changed schools as were starting to learn about them and the new school had finished covering them.

So could you please give me an example, QV?
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 08, 2016, 09:09:48 AM
One of my pet peeves is using an adjective rather than an adverb when modifying a verb.  The PR has heard me complain and comment on this that she uses the adverb correctly.
I missed out on learning about adverbs, adjectives, etc. when I was in school as I changed schools as were starting to learn about them and the new school had finished covering them.

So could you please give me an example, QV?

An adverb modifies a verb.  An adjective modifies a noun or pronoun. 

"I feel bad about that." bad is an adjective modifying the verb feel.  It should be "I feel badly about that."

Basically and general rule of thumb:  add -ly to the adjective when making it an adverb.

And, "This is me."  Wrong, switched around it becomes "Me is this."      Should be "This is she."  We won't even go into "Yup" "Wassup" "Yo."
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on November 27, 2016, 12:44:28 AM
For once, someone got it right. The text at the bottom:
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20160727_071813_zpsvrevnins.jpg)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on November 27, 2016, 03:38:56 AM
Actually, it should be "try to," not "try and."
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on November 29, 2016, 09:00:30 AM
For once, someone got it right. The text at the bottom:
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/20160727_071813_zpsvrevnins.jpg)
those seats have the same covering as our bus seats.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on December 01, 2016, 02:16:14 AM
i would like a fresh and crispy schnitzel burger with extra crispy gravy

i will feed it to the next student who writes "comprised of"
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Jack on December 01, 2016, 05:16:46 PM
i would like a fresh and crispy schnitzel burger with extra crispy gravy

i will feed it to the next student who writes "comprised of"
What's wrong with comprised of?
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Icequeen on December 01, 2016, 09:20:33 PM
i would like a fresh and crispy schnitzel burger with extra crispy gravy

i will feed it to the next student who writes "comprised of"

Can I just get the gravy and an order of fries?

I have no grammar peeves. I dropped out of high school, so I refrain from passing judgement on proper grammar usage.

I will only pass judgement on you if you can't use spell correct.  :autism:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on December 02, 2016, 11:05:51 PM
i would like a fresh and crispy schnitzel burger with extra crispy gravy

i will feed it to the next student who writes "comprised of"
What's wrong with comprised of?
in about 20 years, nothing.

http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/comprise-versus-compose
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on December 03, 2016, 06:12:40 AM
i would like a fresh and crispy schnitzel burger with extra crispy gravy

i will feed it to the next student who writes "comprised of"
What's wrong with comprised of?

The "of".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Jack on December 03, 2016, 07:20:37 AM
i would like a fresh and crispy schnitzel burger with extra crispy gravy

i will feed it to the next student who writes "comprised of"
What's wrong with comprised of?
in about 20 years, nothing.

http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/comprise-versus-compose
Thanks.

i would like a fresh and crispy schnitzel burger with extra crispy gravy

i will feed it to the next student who writes "comprised of"
What's wrong with comprised of?

The "of".
So it would seem. Will have to remember that.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on December 03, 2016, 11:58:06 PM
book i will not be reading:
excerpt from one of the amazon "first" books, by an author who apparently has been honored by usa today and has sold one million books (not all of one title).
"Being that..."
the only time that should appear is if a character is saying it.
it was on the first page of the first chapter.

had to vent; it was burning holes in my brain.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on December 04, 2016, 08:12:18 AM
Being that it started the way it did, shouldn't you sue? :zoinks:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on December 04, 2016, 10:34:26 PM
i would like a fresh and crispy schnitzel burger with extra crispy gravy

i will feed it to the next student who writes "comprised of"
Crispy in that sign's case is spelt "cripsy".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Gopher Gary on December 04, 2016, 10:40:43 PM
That's because it's comprised of crips.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on December 06, 2016, 11:44:59 AM
That's because it's comprised of crips.  :zoinks:

So many things wrong with this. :GA:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on December 07, 2016, 07:31:30 AM
That's because it's comprised of crips.  :zoinks:

So many things wrong with this. :GA:

  Relax and eat you're chips. :trollface:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on December 08, 2016, 10:21:24 AM
That's because it's comprised of crips.  :zoinks:

So many things wrong with this. :GA:

  Relax and eat you're chips. :trollface:

 :runaway:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on December 08, 2016, 01:05:31 PM
That's because it's comprised of crips.  :zoinks:

So many things wrong with this. :GA:

  Relax and eat you're chips. :trollface:

 :runaway:

  Why did you run over their? :trollface:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on December 09, 2016, 12:44:45 PM
LALALALALALA

Can't hear you, can't hear you, can't hear you...
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on December 09, 2016, 07:05:30 PM
LALALALALALA

Can't hear you, can't hear you, can't hear you...

You forgot the FA.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on December 10, 2016, 08:03:02 AM
LALALALALALA

Can't hear you, can't hear you, can't hear you...

You forgot the FA.

He always forget's something.


(found this kind of error twice for the same word in a student's paper. she was doing it on purpose)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on December 10, 2016, 04:35:30 PM
LALALALALALA

Can't hear you, can't hear you, can't hear you...

You forgot the FA.

He always forget's something.


(found this kind of error twice for the same word in a student's paper. she was doing it on purpose)

ARRRGGGHHHHHHH

:GA:

Stop it. You're making me physically ill.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Fun With Matches on December 10, 2016, 06:36:42 PM
They shouldn't of done that.

I feel mean!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on December 11, 2016, 12:41:37 AM
in which he means that based off of your reaction his words can effect you.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on December 11, 2016, 02:25:50 AM
You people ARE mean, making all these errors!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on December 11, 2016, 02:49:42 PM
I need to avoid this thread. :GA:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on January 09, 2017, 07:26:13 AM
  The past tense of  "text"  is  "texted,"  NOT  "text."  :bangbang:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Gopher Gary on January 09, 2017, 09:43:10 PM
  The past tense of  "text"  is  "texted,"  NOT  "text."  :bangbang:

Texted does sound sort of weird.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on January 10, 2017, 06:35:10 AM
  The past tense of  "text"  is  "texted,"  NOT  "text."  :bangbang:

Texted does sound sort of weird.  :dunno:

  I know better than you.  :M :P
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on January 10, 2017, 03:26:18 PM
  The past tense of  "text"  is  "texted,"  NOT  "text."  :bangbang:

Texted does sound sort of weird.  :dunno:

  I know better than you.  :M :P

It's an ugly word. :arrr:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Fun With Matches on January 10, 2017, 03:30:42 PM
I hate, "Y'all".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on January 10, 2017, 03:34:56 PM
Y'all should learn to love natural language. :P
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Fun With Matches on January 10, 2017, 03:52:05 PM
But thats wrong.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Yuri Bezmenov on January 10, 2017, 04:19:49 PM
I hate, "Y'all".

I ain't got no problem with "yall".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Bastet on January 10, 2017, 05:23:07 PM
They shouldn't of done that.

I feel mean!

I hate "should of" or "could of". It's "should HAVE", "could HAVE".
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Fun With Matches on January 10, 2017, 06:27:58 PM
That's why I said it, and put below that I felt mean.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Gopher Gary on January 10, 2017, 08:40:59 PM
I hate, "Y'all".

I hate y'all too.  :zoinks:

I hate, "Y'all".

I ain't got no problem with "yall".

Y'all need Jesus.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Fun With Matches on January 11, 2017, 06:06:55 AM
I hate, "Y'all".

I hate y'all too.  :zoinks:

 :P
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on January 11, 2017, 06:28:23 AM
I hate, "Y'all".

  Queen Victoria occasionally says "y'all."  My favorite example is the post in which she asked,
   "How the fuck do y'all post a link to a Youtube video?!"  That's how you do it.  :2thumbsup:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Grey Area on January 11, 2017, 11:35:48 AM
You people ARE mean, making all these errors!

Correcting errors is of the upmost importance.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Jack on January 11, 2017, 04:43:07 PM
You people ARE mean, making all these errors!

Correcting errors is of the upmost importance.

That's correct. Correcting them before other people notice is even better. It's like it never happened.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Bastet on January 11, 2017, 04:56:06 PM
That's why I said it, and put below that I felt mean.

I didn't get it. I guess I didn't understand what "I feel mean" meant and that was a pet peeve, too.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Bastet on January 11, 2017, 04:57:06 PM
You people ARE mean, making all these errors!

Correcting errors is of the upmost importance.

Supposebly.

Another spelling pet peeve.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on January 13, 2017, 12:32:37 AM
Oh, yes. I know someone that actually says supposebly. Argh.

(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/FB_IMG_1482799664378_zpsffmfmgu8.jpg)

(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/FB_IMG_1483341510428_zpsn5r5jcbn.jpg)

Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on February 12, 2017, 01:17:23 AM
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/FB_IMG_1479205738535_zpsay5kdmmj.jpg)
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Gopher Gary on February 12, 2017, 01:05:08 PM
 :lol1:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on February 12, 2017, 04:17:39 PM
That's terrible. And funny.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on February 13, 2017, 12:50:45 AM
ouch.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 17, 2017, 02:25:36 PM

"My car needs washed."

"They need helped."

"That needs ate."

"This needs finished."

"His grass needs mowed."




 :bigcry:
I can not stand it much longer.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 18, 2017, 04:19:58 PM

Vietmanese.

Yes, really! Look at it again. They do not say Vietnamese, they say Vietmanese.

:puke:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 18, 2017, 04:24:31 PM
(http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p209/renaeden/FB_IMG_1479205738535_zpsay5kdmmj.jpg)

As funny as that is, I feel that many average people will look at it and notice "ONE"  mistake, maybe two.

Great find, Ren!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 18, 2017, 04:29:07 PM

Talking about one of the mistakes, I hate to see when people write compound words when they are not warranted AND the inverse as well.

There is a difference between "sometime"  and  "some time,"  right?

... any way and anyway  (how about anyways?  :green:)

... when ever and whenever
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 19, 2017, 05:36:12 AM
  I see the word "barely" spelled "barley" a lot online these days.  Autocorrect gone wrong?  :dunno:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on February 19, 2017, 12:52:31 PM
  I see the word "barely" spelled "barley" a lot online these days.  Autocorrect gone wrong?  :dunno:

Barley any have it right. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 19, 2017, 02:19:50 PM
  I see the word "barely" spelled "barley" a lot online these days.  Autocorrect gone wrong?  :dunno:

Barley any have it right. :zoinks:

I all most all ways get it right!
 :P
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on February 19, 2017, 06:13:27 PM
  I see the word "barely" spelled "barley" a lot online these days.  Autocorrect gone wrong?  :dunno:

Barley any have it right. :zoinks:

Beer makes anything bearable.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on February 19, 2017, 10:11:00 PM
 ...if the pros out way the cons... :GA:

not so post to :zombiefuck:

these were taken from student submissions.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on February 20, 2017, 12:12:39 AM
  I see the word "barely" spelled "barley" a lot online these days.  Autocorrect gone wrong?  :dunno:

Barley any have it right. :zoinks:

Beer makes anything beerable.

Fixed. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on February 20, 2017, 01:26:27 AM
  I see the word "barely" spelled "barley" a lot online these days.  Autocorrect gone wrong?  :dunno:

Barley any have it right. :zoinks:

Beer makes anything beerable.

Fixed. :zoinks:

 :clap:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 20, 2017, 02:27:08 AM
...if the pros out way the cons... :GA:

not so post to :zombiefuck:

these were taken from student submissions.


 :zombiefuck:
Indeed!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on February 21, 2017, 01:43:54 AM
"These doors are alarmed"

On a set of doors at King's Cross.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on February 21, 2017, 05:56:56 AM
"These doors are alarmed"

On a set of doors at King's Cross.
I have seen signs like that in shopping centres. Usually at the back of the store.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 21, 2017, 11:26:12 AM
"These doors are alarmed"

On a set of doors at King's Cross.

Someone should work on calming them back down.
 :dunno:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Jack on February 21, 2017, 05:35:45 PM
"These doors are alarmed"

On a set of doors at King's Cross.

Someone should work on calming them back down.
 :dunno:

:laugh:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: WolFish on February 23, 2017, 02:02:55 AM
amazon dot com listing (i copied and pasted):

Cross Pens CroAT0625-6 Pearle Scent Blue Gel Ink Pen

someone corrected the spelling, lol.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 24, 2017, 12:18:39 PM
amazon dot com listing (i copied and pasted):

Cross Pens CroAT0625-6 Pearle Scent Blue Gel Ink Pen

someone corrected the spelling, lol.

I have found a tiny pearl inside an oyster that I had begun to eat before (approximately three thirty seconds of an inch in diameter, but it was beautifully colored and perfectly spherical as far as anyone could tell) and it smelled like the inside of an oyster, even after I spat it out and showed it off to everyone at the table.

So I am internally compelled to ask; what does "Pearle Scent Blue Gel Ink Pen" smell like, exactly?
 :apondering:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on February 24, 2017, 12:20:38 PM
"These doors are alarmed"

On a set of doors at King's Cross.

Someone should work on calming them back down.
 :dunno:

It's the terror threat. YOu'd be worried, too, if you had to live your life at King's Cross. :P
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on February 24, 2017, 01:13:52 PM
"These doors are alarmed"

On a set of doors at King's Cross.

Someone should work on calming them back down.
 :dunno:

It's the terror threat. YOu'd be worried, too, if you had to live your life at King's Cross. :P

Quite so, I am sure.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on February 24, 2017, 05:48:47 PM
"These doors are alarmed"

On a set of doors at King's Cross.

Someone should work on calming them back down.
 :dunno:

It's the terror threat. YOu'd be worried, too, if you had to live your life at King's Cross. :P

Quite so, I am sure.

They stole my phone, you know. The doors were startled.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 25, 2017, 05:54:53 AM
  Another possible autocorrect issue I keep seeing is "definitely" spelled as "defiantly."  :soapbox:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on February 25, 2017, 06:22:25 AM
Another possible autocorrect isue I keep seeing is "definitely" spelled as "defiantly."  :soapbox:
Shouldn't really should it? As definitely is used a lot more often.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 25, 2017, 06:29:29 AM
Another possible autocorrect isue I keep seeing is "definitely" spelled as "defiantly."  :soapbox:
Shouldn't really should it? As definitely is used a lot more often.

  I suspect people are spelling "definitely" as "definately," and the autocorrect picks the wrong match.  :apondering:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on February 25, 2017, 06:53:08 AM
Idiots. Their own fault. Just a pity other people have to read it.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 25, 2017, 06:55:31 AM
Idiots. Their own fault. Just a pity other people have to read it.

  I get cranky and start shaking my head at the uneducated millennials.  :get: :lol2: :laugh:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Icequeen on February 27, 2017, 12:54:06 PM
Kids.

(http://54.144.231.100/wp-content/uploads/When-Kids-Spell-Words-Wrong-and-they-end-up-dirty.jpg)

(http://54.144.231.100/wp-content/uploads/Adult-Word-Accidentally-Written-by-a-Child.jpg)

(http://54.144.231.100/wp-content/uploads/This-Kid-Was-Not-Trying-to-Be-Dirty-with-their-writing.jpg)

Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on February 27, 2017, 05:05:13 PM
:lol1:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Gopher Gary on February 27, 2017, 08:00:00 PM
I like laughing about hores too.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Icequeen on February 27, 2017, 09:58:44 PM
I come in peace...

(http://static.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/funny-children-mistakes-10.jpg)

Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on February 28, 2017, 04:31:48 AM
  It takes a very special teacher to do meth with the students. :heisenberg:


   Also, hores.  :rofl:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Fun With Matches on February 28, 2017, 03:29:05 PM
Noo!!! Not Buzz Lightyear! He's my childhood hero. :heart:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Jack on February 28, 2017, 05:06:02 PM
Noo!!! Not Buzz Lightyear! He's my childhood hero. :heart:
The composition is excellent, and the perspective on the bent leg is a skill young children don't generally have, so if it's legitimately a child's drawing then their spelling is excused.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on February 28, 2017, 05:09:33 PM
:rofl:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Fun With Matches on February 28, 2017, 07:38:00 PM
Noo!!! Not Buzz Lightyear! He's my childhood hero. :heart:
The composition is excellent, and the perspective on the bent leg is a skill young children don't generally have, so if it's legitimately a child's drawing then their spelling is excused.

Very true. They wouldn't do the blinking light effects either.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on March 07, 2017, 01:34:26 AM

How about ...

"guaranteed warranty"

:hair:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: 'andersom' on March 07, 2017, 03:20:59 AM

How about ...

"guaranteed warranty"

:hair:
:lol1:

I would not buy it.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on March 09, 2017, 02:16:42 PM
 ... can I not expect at least a close assemblance of ...  (semblance?)

I know most of mine are more about horrid mis-usages than simple spelling errors.

Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on March 09, 2017, 11:19:02 PM
Mis-usages are just as relevant.

One thing I have wondered for a long time (I hope someone can help me with this), is it "suffice to say" or "suffice it to say"?

I have seen both and wonder if only one is correct or they both are.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on March 10, 2017, 12:36:42 AM
Suffice to say.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on March 11, 2017, 05:18:49 AM
Thanks odeon. Have you ever heard the other version?
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on March 11, 2017, 07:23:01 AM
I don't think so. The Brits don't use it.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on May 01, 2017, 05:40:19 AM
People who write "defiantly" instead of "definitely". Don't they realise that it looks totally wrong and it has a totally different meaning?
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on May 01, 2017, 05:43:07 AM
People who write "defiantly" instead of "definitely". Don't they realise that it looks totally wrong and it has a totally different meaning?

  I've also seen it spelled "definately."  I suspect "defiantly" is what autocorrect comes up with.  :orly:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on May 01, 2017, 05:48:37 AM
Horror! My oldest sister spells "can't" as "carnt"! It is not a typo either as I have seen it a number of times and again just now.

The shame.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on May 01, 2017, 05:50:19 AM
Horror! My oldest sister spells "can't" as "carnt"! It is not a typo either as I have seen it a number of times and again just now.

The shame.

  Does she pronounce it that way?  Maybe her own accent is working against her.  :P
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: renaeden on May 01, 2017, 05:54:49 AM
Horror! My oldest sister spells "can't" as "carnt"! It is not a typo either as I have seen it a number of times and again just now.

The shame.
Does she pronounce it that way?  Maybe her own accent is working against her.  :P
With the Australian accent, they are both said the same. We don't say the r and it does not rhyme with ant like it does for you Americans.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on May 01, 2017, 11:49:11 PM
That's defiantly wrong.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on May 02, 2017, 09:23:42 AM
That's defiantly wrong.
 

Don't be so stubborn about it.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on May 02, 2017, 10:25:25 AM
  Poor internet spellers, listen up:  If you lose weight, your pants will get loose. :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on May 03, 2017, 12:25:20 AM
  Poor internet spellers, listen up:  If you lose weight, your pants will get loose. :facepalm2:

Play fast and lose with the grammar. :P
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on May 03, 2017, 05:18:50 AM
  Poor internet spellers, listen up:  If you lose weight, your pants will get loose. :facepalm2:

Play fast and lose with the grammar. :P

  You're part of the problem.  Stop encouraging them!   :GA:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on May 03, 2017, 10:33:09 AM
  Poor internet spellers, listen up:  If you lose weight, your pants will get loose. :facepalm2:

Play fast and lose with the Grandma. :P

Fixed
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on May 03, 2017, 12:10:24 PM
  Poor internet spellers, listen up:  If you lose weight, your pants will get loose. :facepalm2:

Play fast and lose with the Grandma. :P

Fixed

Disturbing!

So many levels ...
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on May 03, 2017, 12:13:55 PM

Meddle, mettle, medal, metal!!!

Do I actually have to explain it all over again!??!
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on May 03, 2017, 12:18:11 PM

Beside, besides. Aside, asides. Etc.

It happens!


Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on May 03, 2017, 12:24:05 PM

Or how about the commonly misused "conferencing?"

There is no conferencing, there is only conferring. They did not conference today, They conferred. You might have a conference to attend, but what you do there is not conferencing. It is conferring!

:hair:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: odeon on May 03, 2017, 03:47:55 PM
I defiantly have to do some conferencing tomorrow.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: "couldbecousin" on May 03, 2017, 06:05:50 PM
I defiantly have to do some conferencing tomorrow.

  I can barley keep my sanity when I read such dreck.  :headhurts:
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on May 03, 2017, 07:13:05 PM
I defiantly have to do some conferencing tomorrow.

Take pics because no one with a brain believes you. :P
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: MLA on May 04, 2017, 09:05:46 AM
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/conferencing (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/conferencing)

It's a fairly new addition.  Only since 1865 or so.
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: Queen Victoria on May 04, 2017, 10:53:19 AM
shall    will
may     can

VIN number

complected instead of complexioned
Title: Re: Pet Grammar/Spelling Peeves
Post by: DirtDawg on May 04, 2017, 07:23:20 PM
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/conferencing (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/conferencing)

It's a fairly new addition.  Only since 1865 or so.

You do understand that that is bullshit, right?
I do not care how many .coms they have in their name.
 :LOL: