INTENSITY²

Start here => What's your crime? Basic Discussion => Topic started by: Queen Victoria on October 07, 2010, 06:21:44 PM

Title: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 07, 2010, 06:21:44 PM
I propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc.  that goes on for more than 3 lines. 
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 06:23:08 PM
I propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc.  that goes on for more than 3 lines. 

I couldn't agree more. That bugged hell out of me today.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Parts on October 07, 2010, 06:24:30 PM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 07, 2010, 06:29:01 PM
Topicbombing is annoying. but I'm used to it, Ive been on the internet for a long time now, it happens everywhere.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 07, 2010, 06:29:53 PM
As a temporary measure I'm putting anyone who has decided to hang wallpaper on Ignore.  The Queen is NOT amused.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 07, 2010, 06:30:52 PM
I propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc.  that goes on for more than 3 lines. 


Meh, lighten up a bit.

Several of us have done so, out of misplaced rage or the inability to properly express ourselves, and thought better of it upon the morn.  Some days are diamonds and some days are coal. Fucking deal with it or find one of the many well indicated exits available on each floor.

If you insist upon pursuing this fascist reign of power mongery, then might I also suggest a Three Strikes Rule, as long as no more than one strike is counted after one single day/incident/melt down.

I suggest that you get over yourself a bit.

Everyone else should simply call this "Strike One" for this poster and ignore it until tomorrow and see how it goes.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Parts on October 07, 2010, 06:31:40 PM
I am using someone elses connection and it slow so the wall paper takes too much time
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2010, 06:32:19 PM
As a temporary measure I'm putting anyone who has decided to hang wallpaper on Ignore.  The Queen is NOT amused.

Besides, they didn't use Wedgewood blue and Etruscan red regency stripes.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 07, 2010, 06:35:42 PM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 07, 2010, 06:36:47 PM
I am using someone elses connection and it slow so the wall paper takes too much time

Again, ONE person in a community is having mroe trouble than the rest of the community.

THIS IS NOT A REASON TO MAKE A FUCKING BLANKET RULE AGAINST THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY!!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2010, 06:38:08 PM
Yeah I don't think we should ban anyone for it. I see nothing wrong with them being edited down though if it's repeated. Once in a while to make a point is ok, but in every fucking thread you click kn when you get in... that's just annoying as the page loads slower. for me anyway
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 06:39:46 PM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

I think she was maybe joking about the bans :-\
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 07, 2010, 06:40:16 PM
Yeah I don't think we should ban anyone for it. I see nothing wrong with them being edited down though if it's repeated. Once in a while to make a point is ok, but in every fucking thread you click kn when you get in... that's just annoying as the page loads slower. for me anyway

You HAVE missed my entire point!!


SHIT!!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2010, 06:41:07 PM
Yeah I don't think we should ban anyone for it. I see nothing wrong with them being edited down though if it's repeated. Once in a while to make a point is ok, but in every fucking thread you click kn when you get in... that's just annoying as the page loads slower. for me anyway

You HAVE missed my entire point!!


SHIT!!

what point?

I didnt really read your post, just skimmed the thread
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 06:42:28 PM
Hands DD a chill pill :o
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 07, 2010, 06:43:03 PM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

I think she was maybe joking about the bans :-\

Fascism, terrorism, banning and rape are not subjects that those of us who know a bit about them are willing to joke about.

If it was a joke, then I will shut up and accept the damage that has been done as another example of someone not knowing how to communicate well.

... including my own self in that group, that is.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Parts on October 07, 2010, 06:43:30 PM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

I would not want to ban them but wish they would use some common sense and take care of it themselves.    As of it loading slow for me I am sure I am not the only one.  Editing anythin not threatening the site I think should be a decision of more than just one of us should agree on
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 07, 2010, 06:44:47 PM
Yeah I don't think we should ban anyone for it. I see nothing wrong with them being edited down though if it's repeated. Once in a while to make a point is ok, but in every fucking thread you click kn when you get in... that's just annoying as the page loads slower. for me anyway

You HAVE missed my entire point!!


SHIT!!

what point?

I didnt really read your post, just skimmed the thread

Well, SHIT, TWICE!!

This is how fucked up things happen.

People just skim and go about their business oblivious to the reality of what the are involved in.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 06:45:26 PM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

I think she was maybe joking about the bans :-\

Fascism, terrorism, banning and rape are not subjects that those of us who know a bit about them are willing to joke about.

If it was a joke, then I will shut up and accept the damage that has been done as another example of someone not knowing how to communicate well.

... including my own self in that group, that is.

I'm sorry DD, my inner aspie's probably playing up again. But, are you serious :-\
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: "couldbecousin" on October 07, 2010, 06:46:15 PM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

I would not want to ban them but wish they would use some common sense and take care of it themselves.    As of it loading slow for me I am sure I am not the only one.  Editing anythin not threatening the site I think should be a decision of more than just one of us should agree on

You're not the only one. Certain pages become almost unusable for me when loaded with walls of smilies.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 07, 2010, 06:46:29 PM
Fuck this!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 07, 2010, 06:47:21 PM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

Rage and Mudkipz are  perfectly capable of expreshing themselves in numerous appropriate manners.  An occasional, restrained wallpapering is not what I'm objecting to. 

I do not know what can and cannot be done or what is chosen to be done or not done by moderators.  In my ignorance I came up with the temporary ban idea.  It would be okay to have a warning or two before having a temporary ban.  In the meantime I've chosen to put those members on a temporary ignore status for a while. 
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 06:47:45 PM
Fuck this!

 ??? ??? ???
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2010, 06:48:43 PM
Yeah I don't think we should ban anyone for it. I see nothing wrong with them being edited down though if it's repeated. Once in a while to make a point is ok, but in every fucking thread you click kn when you get in... that's just annoying as the page loads slower. for me anyway

You HAVE missed my entire point!!


SHIT!!

what point?

I didnt really read your post, just skimmed the thread

Well, SHIT, TWICE!!

This is how fucked up things happen.

People just skim and go about their business oblivious to the reality of what the are involved in.


What I am involved in? We're on a website on the internet, not the fucking houses of parliament.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2010, 06:49:07 PM
Call me captain obvious, but the reason 'wallpaper' pisses people off is that apsies and auties can't handle information overload. And that's what happens when too much of that shit is displayed at once. I was guilty of it a couple of times myself, and since I learned to cope with losing it, I don't post like that anymore.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Parts on October 07, 2010, 06:50:25 PM
Fuck this!

 ??? ??? ???

Me too  ???
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 06:51:22 PM
Yeah I don't think we should ban anyone for it. I see nothing wrong with them being edited down though if it's repeated. Once in a while to make a point is ok, but in every fucking thread you click kn when you get in... that's just annoying as the page loads slower. for me anyway

You HAVE missed my entire point!!


SHIT!!

what point?

I didnt really read your post, just skimmed the thread

Well, SHIT, TWICE!!

This is how fucked up things happen.

People just skim and go about their business oblivious to the reality of what the are involved in.


What I am involved in? We're on a website on the internet, not the fucking houses of parliament.

I think he's just having a laugh with us, although I'm not very sure. I hope to fuck he's just having a laugh with us, because if he's serious I think he's acting rather inappropriatlely :-\
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2010, 06:52:02 PM
This isn;t an AS thing - it would piss off NTs too - it's the fact that it slows down most people/s computers. Even if only for a couple seconds, when it's in every fuciking thread that gets annoying
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2010, 06:52:42 PM

I think he's just having a laugh with us, although I'm not very sure. I hope to fuck he's just having a laugh with us, because if he's serious I think he's acting rather inappropriatlely :-\

OK I am probably just missing this lol
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 06:54:26 PM

I think he's just having a laugh with us, although I'm not very sure. I hope to fuck he's just having a laugh with us, because if he's serious I think he's acting rather inappropriatlely :-\

OK I am probably just missing this lol

 :indeed: his humour is going somewhat over my head at the moment.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2010, 06:55:28 PM
This isn;t an AS thing - it would piss off NTs too - it's the fact that it slows down most people/s computers. Even if only for a couple seconds, when it's in every fuciking thread that gets annoying

Point taken. It's just that I've mainly been on aspie forums and haven't dealt with the others.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2010, 06:58:06 PM
That;s cool

I have onlyy ever really been on AS forums myself so dunno. I think it would irritate on any forum though, not just aspies
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Osensitive1 on October 07, 2010, 06:59:17 PM
 Editing anythin not threatening the site I think should be a decision of more than just one of us should agree on
Wasn't editing already agreed on in the "Walls of Smileys" thread? Didn't vote so can't see the results.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Loupgarou on October 07, 2010, 07:34:38 PM
What is "wallpaper" on a forum? I am completely fucking clueless.

Loup
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Osensitive1 on October 07, 2010, 07:36:46 PM
They're talking about all of the posts today that are a big wall of the same picture over and over.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Loupgarou on October 07, 2010, 07:37:47 PM
They're talking about all of the posts today that are a big wall of the same picture over and over.

Oh okay. Thanks Miss O :thumbup:

Loup
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Parts on October 07, 2010, 07:38:54 PM
 Editing anythin not threatening the site I think should be a decision of more than just one of us should agree on
Wasn't editing already agreed on in the "Walls of Smileys" thread? Didn't vote so can't see the results.

not sure memory is bad today
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 07:39:18 PM
I'm still not sure if DD was winding us up, or if he was throwing a minor hissy-fit ???
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2010, 07:40:30 PM
maybe he was having a meltdown
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 07:42:09 PM
maybe he was having a meltdown

I want to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that he was just playing with us, but that did come rather close to straying into emo territory :laugh:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Osensitive1 on October 07, 2010, 07:47:27 PM
Looked like the word ban was the igniter. Would have been bitching about the wall of pix too if still on the old computer. That's why I remember the wall of smileys thread. This one handles it fine though, so it was more just annoying this time.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 07:53:46 PM
Looked like the word ban was the igniter. Would have been bitching about the wall of pix too if still on the old computer. That's why I remember the wall of smileys thread. This one handles it fine though, so it was more just annoying this time.

I certainly don't want to ban Rage, and I don't think it would be fair to ban Mudkipz after he appears to have made a real effort to stop trolling. The wallpaper did bug me slightly, but I was just having a laugh with Weakling when I agreed with a banning.

I would have expected his behaviour from one of the less stable members, but I must admit I was rather shocked and saddened by DDs behaviour.  :(
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 07, 2010, 07:58:09 PM
Apologies for participating in this.

I'll remove the posts I made immediately.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Osensitive1 on October 07, 2010, 08:02:43 PM
Leave at least one picture though. The hitler pika is cute.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 07, 2010, 08:04:33 PM
Leave at least one picture though. The hitler pika is cute.

oops too late  :lol:

I'll send you the picture in PM sensitive  :thumbup:

Apologies to anyone who was annoyed over the spamming  :)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 07, 2010, 08:05:58 PM
Apologies for participating in this.

I'll remove the posts I made immediately.

Don't worry about it. I was just having a laugh really. No harm done. TBH I'm just a bit surprised and disappointed by Dirtdawgs behaviour.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Osensitive1 on October 07, 2010, 08:06:49 PM
I would have expected his behaviour from one of the less stable members, but I must admit I was rather shocked and saddened by DDs behaviour.  :(
Oh my, how to respond without the rude third person?

Dirt, I can only describe your personality as 'urgent', even your rants are worth reading.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 07, 2010, 08:10:40 PM
Apologies for participating in this.

I'll remove the posts I made immediately.

Don't worry about it. I was just having a laugh really. No harm done. TBH I'm just a bit surprised and disappointed by Dirtdawgs behaviour.

Well we all have different triggers not exactly sure what his was though  :-\
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2010, 08:28:12 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 07, 2010, 08:29:12 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.

"A meadow wet with dew....."

:rofl:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2010, 08:41:26 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.

"A meadow wet with dew....."

:rofl:

Where did you find that one?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 07, 2010, 08:42:55 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.

"A meadow wet with dew....."

:rofl:

Where did you find that one?

remember in Meadows "Banned from WP" thread I said the description for the swedish word for cunt? :P
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2010, 08:54:05 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.

"A meadow wet with dew....."

:rofl:

Where did you find that one?

remember in Meadows "Banned from WP" thread I said the description for the swedish word for cunt? :P

fitta?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 07, 2010, 08:54:57 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.

"A meadow wet with dew....."

:rofl:

Where did you find that one?

remember in Meadows "Banned from WP" thread I said the description for the swedish word for cunt? :P

fitta?

I dont know the actual word but I just remember a swedish guy describing it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2010, 08:56:46 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.

"A meadow wet with dew....."

:rofl:

Where did you find that one?

remember in Meadows "Banned from WP" thread I said the description for the swedish word for cunt? :P

fitta?

I dont know the actual word but I just remember a swedish guy describing it.

I look up some Swedish swears, and fitta was the closest they had for cunt.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 07, 2010, 08:59:56 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.

"A meadow wet with dew....."that should be it  :thumbup:

:rofl:

Where did you find that one?

remember in Meadows "Banned from WP" thread I said the description for the swedish word for cunt? :P

fitta?

I dont know the actual word but I just remember a swedish guy describing it.

I look up some Swedish swears, and fitta was the closest they had for cunt.

ahhhh well if the description means " A meadow wet with dew"
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2010, 09:08:53 PM
At least DD's aren't the same as Meadow's.

Taking a walk through that Meadow would be like roaming through a field of brambles.

"A meadow wet with dew....."that should be it  :thumbup:

:rofl:

Where did you find that one?

remember in Meadows "Banned from WP" thread I said the description for the swedish word for cunt? :P

fitta?

I dont know the actual word but I just remember a swedish guy describing it.

I look up some Swedish swears, and fitta was the closest they had for cunt.

ahhhh well if the description means " A meadow wet with dew"

Well, meadows are a bush of some sort, and they do get wet in the morning...
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 08, 2010, 04:52:34 PM
Apologies for participating in this.

I'll remove the posts I made immediately.

Don't worry about it. I was just having a laugh really. No harm done. TBH I'm just a bit surprised and disappointed by Dirtdawgs behaviour.

Well we all have different triggers not exactly sure what his was though  :-\

I'm guessing that it was the thought of actually banning someone, even temporarily, for having communication problems and only feeling they can express themselves through posting page after page of the same emoticon or picture.

I think we can edit down the number of repeats to be more reasonable so it won't make the pages so slow to load for people who don't have super fast internet, though.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 08, 2010, 04:53:25 PM
 Editing anythin not threatening the site I think should be a decision of more than just one of us should agree on
Wasn't editing already agreed on in the "Walls of Smileys" thread? Didn't vote so can't see the results.

I think you're right.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 09, 2010, 05:36:00 PM
The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.


I think that a wise person should speak next.


Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 09, 2010, 05:37:45 PM

The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.

I don't want war. I was just having a laugh about your hissy-fit.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 09, 2010, 05:43:45 PM
Oh shit, was I ever on ignore? I did it too.  But why didn't I think of the ignore function? I'm so retarded.  :laugh:


Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 05:46:59 PM
I'm so retarded.  :laugh:




 :indeed:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 09, 2010, 05:48:00 PM

The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.

I don't want war. I was just having a laugh about your hissy-fit.


Not laughing.

One of the many differences between wisdom and idiotic twunt behavior is that idiotic twunts can not see "Big Picture" wisdom even when it slaps them in the face.

If you think I was having a hissy fit, just because I do not want to see major changes in the administrative demeanor of my third favorite site, then I doubt that you would recognise wisdom if it slapped you in the face.

Go back to my comment about laughable subjects, before you continue.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 09, 2010, 05:51:51 PM
Oh shit, was I ever on ignore? I did it too.  But why didn't I think of the ignore function? I'm so retarded.  :laugh:




You do not need to press a button to ignore someone and I can prove it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 09, 2010, 05:52:18 PM
the wallpapering seems to be over now anyway,

okay, heres a new bet

10 krones for this thread to reach.. 30 pages!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 09, 2010, 05:52:42 PM
Oh shit, was I ever on ignore? I did it too.  But why didn't I think of the ignore function? I'm so retarded.  :laugh:




You do not need to press a button to ignore someone and I can prove it.

How?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 09, 2010, 05:56:05 PM

The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.

I don't want war. I was just having a laugh about your hissy-fit.


Not laughing.

One of the many differences between wisdom and idiotic twunt behavior is that idiotic twunts can not see "Big Picture" wisdom even when it slaps them in the face.

If you think I was having a hissy fit, just because I do not want to see major changes in the administrative demeanor of my third favorite site, then I doubt that you would recognise wisdom if it slapped you in the face.

Go back to my comment about laughable subjects, before you want to continue.

I think your behaviour was childish. Nobody was seriously suggesting changes in the administrative demeanor of your third favourite site ::). And even if they had been, I still think your behaviour would have been childish.

If throwing a hissy, accusing Soph of being "oblivious to the reality of what the are involved in," and storming out with a "fuck this" are your idea of wisdom, then fuck me, you are nowhere near as wise as you think you are.

You appear to be extremely self-important and somewhat volatile. I had hoped this little episode was down to a mini-meltdown, or forgetting to take your meds, and I hoped you would have been able to have a laugh about it by now.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 09, 2010, 06:00:46 PM
the wallpapering seems to be over now anyway,

okay, heres a new bet

10 krones for this thread to reach.. 30 pages!

Maybe, but I only counted three people who have set themselves on the blind, deaf, dumb and ignorant side of this essential and unending argument, THIS time.

I hope you are wrong about the ultimate length of this thread, because the longer it gets the less likely it is that future members will read it and the MORE likely it will become that this discussion will be advanced again to the newer members who have also just come from places like WP.

Better to keep it "short,"  increasing its value while simultaneously increasing the likelihood that others will actually read the essence of what is happening here.

It is the future that is in danger, you see.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 09, 2010, 06:04:07 PM
the wallpapering seems to be over now anyway,

okay, heres a new bet

10 krones for this thread to reach.. 30 pages!

Maybe, but I only counted three people who have set themselves on the blind, deaf, dumb and ignorant side of this essential and unending argument, THIS time.

I hope you are wrong about the ultimate length of this thread, because the longer it gets the less likely it is that future members will read it and the MORE likely it will become that this discussion will be advanced again to the newer members who have also just come from places like WP.

Better to keep it "short,"  increasing its value while simultaneously increasing the likelihood that others will actually read the essence of what is happening here.

It is the future that is in danger, you see.

Is there a smilie that says "I've never come across an adult in all my life that is so full of bullshit?"
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DirtDawg on October 09, 2010, 06:04:25 PM

The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.

I don't want war. I was just having a laugh about your hissy-fit.


Not laughing.

One of the many differences between wisdom and idiotic twunt behavior is that idiotic twunts can not see "Big Picture" wisdom even when it slaps them in the face.

If you think I was having a hissy fit, just because I do not want to see major changes in the administrative demeanor of my third favorite site, then I doubt that you would recognise wisdom if it slapped you in the face.

Go back to my comment about laughable subjects, before you want to continue.

I think your behaviour was childish. Nobody was seriously suggesting changes in the administrative demeanor of your third favourite site ::). And even if they had been, I still think your behaviour would have been childish.

If throwing a hissy, accusing Soph of being "oblivious to the reality of what the are involved in," and storming out with a "fuck this" are your idea of wisdom, then fuck me, you are nowhere near as wise as you think you are.

You appear to be extremely self-important and somewhat volatile. I had hoped this little episode was down to a mini-meltdown, or forgetting to take your meds, and I hoped you would have been able to have a laugh about it by now.

It was NOT my wisdom to which I made multiple references.

You probably need to read back a bit to find the wisdom.

To make a further comment upon the obvious, I did not leave, did I?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 09, 2010, 06:07:55 PM

The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.

I don't want war. I was just having a laugh about your hissy-fit.


Not laughing.

One of the many differences between wisdom and idiotic twunt behavior is that idiotic twunts can not see "Big Picture" wisdom even when it slaps them in the face.

If you think I was having a hissy fit, just because I do not want to see major changes in the administrative demeanor of my third favorite site, then I doubt that you would recognise wisdom if it slapped you in the face.

Go back to my comment about laughable subjects, before you want to continue.

I think your behaviour was childish. Nobody was seriously suggesting changes in the administrative demeanor of your third favourite site ::). And even if they had been, I still think your behaviour would have been childish.

If throwing a hissy, accusing Soph of being "oblivious to the reality of what the are involved in," and storming out with a "fuck this" are your idea of wisdom, then fuck me, you are nowhere near as wise as you think you are.

You appear to be extremely self-important and somewhat volatile. I had hoped this little episode was down to a mini-meltdown, or forgetting to take your meds, and I hoped you would have been able to have a laugh about it by now.

It was NOT my wisdom to which I made multiple references.

You probably need to read back a bit to find the wisdom.

To make a further comment upon the obvious, I did not leave, did I?

Fuck this!

And then you stopped posting for a day.

I find you to be full of self import and long winded statements, but rather low on wisdom.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 06:12:12 PM
the wallpapering seems to be over now anyway,

okay, heres a new bet

10 krones for this thread to reach.. 30 pages!

Maybe, but I only counted three people who have set themselves on the blind, deaf, dumb and ignorant side of this essential and unending argument, THIS time.

I hope you are wrong about the ultimate length of this thread, because the longer it gets the less likely it is that future members will read it and the MORE likely it will become that this discussion will be advanced again to the newer members who have also just come from places like WP.

Better to keep it "short,"  increasing its value while simultaneously increasing the likelihood that others will actually read the essence of what is happening here.

It is the future that is in danger, you see.

Is there a smilie that says "I've never come across an adult in all my life that is so full of bullshit?"

I think you're a troll. DirtDawq's request is fair.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 06:13:05 PM

The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.

I don't want war. I was just having a laugh about your hissy-fit.


Not laughing.

One of the many differences between wisdom and idiotic twunt behavior is that idiotic twunts can not see "Big Picture" wisdom even when it slaps them in the face.

If you think I was having a hissy fit, just because I do not want to see major changes in the administrative demeanor of my third favorite site, then I doubt that you would recognise wisdom if it slapped you in the face.

Go back to my comment about laughable subjects, before you want to continue.

I think your behaviour was childish. Nobody was seriously suggesting changes in the administrative demeanor of your third favourite site ::). And even if they had been, I still think your behaviour would have been childish.

If throwing a hissy, accusing Soph of being "oblivious to the reality of what the are involved in," and storming out with a "fuck this" are your idea of wisdom, then fuck me, you are nowhere near as wise as you think you are.

You appear to be extremely self-important and somewhat volatile. I had hoped this little episode was down to a mini-meltdown, or forgetting to take your meds, and I hoped you would have been able to have a laugh about it by now.

It was NOT my wisdom to which I made multiple references.

You probably need to read back a bit to find the wisdom.

To make a further comment upon the obvious, I did not leave, did I?

Fuck this!

And then you stopped posting for a day.

I find you to be full of self import and long winded statements, but rather low on wisdom.

If anyone's low on wisdom, you are.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 09, 2010, 06:14:07 PM

The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.

I don't want war. I was just having a laugh about your hissy-fit.


Not laughing.

One of the many differences between wisdom and idiotic twunt behavior is that idiotic twunts can not see "Big Picture" wisdom even when it slaps them in the face.

If you think I was having a hissy fit, just because I do not want to see major changes in the administrative demeanor of my third favorite site, then I doubt that you would recognise wisdom if it slapped you in the face.

Go back to my comment about laughable subjects, before you continue.

I agree with your reasoning. I don't think anyone has been banned just for spamming unless they were extreme enough with it to make the site completely unreadable, like Atomika.


The one legend who still holds the notion of individual freedoms over all who have listened was born today, seventy years hence. There are a few left who still follow his legacy.

All of you who want war should just sleep on it and think again, tomorrow.

I don't want war. I was just having a laugh about your hissy-fit.


Not laughing.

One of the many differences between wisdom and idiotic twunt behavior is that idiotic twunts can not see "Big Picture" wisdom even when it slaps them in the face.

If you think I was having a hissy fit, just because I do not want to see major changes in the administrative demeanor of my third favorite site, then I doubt that you would recognise wisdom if it slapped you in the face.

Go back to my comment about laughable subjects, before you want to continue.

I think your behaviour was childish. Nobody was seriously suggesting changes in the administrative demeanor of your third favourite site ::). And even if they had been, I still think your behaviour would have been childish.

If throwing a hissy, accusing Soph of being "oblivious to the reality of what the are involved in," and storming out with a "fuck this" are your idea of wisdom, then fuck me, you are nowhere near as wise as you think you are.

You appear to be extremely self-important and somewhat volatile. I had hoped this little episode was down to a mini-meltdown, or forgetting to take your meds, and I hoped you would have been able to have a laugh about it by now.

You may have just been joking, Butterflies, but I took Weakling's and your comments seriously at first.  I certainly can see how someone could take it seriously.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 09, 2010, 06:16:14 PM
Oh shit, was I ever on ignore? I did it too.  But why didn't I think of the ignore function? I'm so retarded.  :laugh:




You do not need to press a button to ignore someone and I can prove it.

How?

You just don't respond to their posts, like the way we did here before we had an ignore function.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 09, 2010, 06:19:16 PM
Quote
You may have just been joking, Butterflies, but I took Weakling's and your comments seriously at first.  I certainly can see how someone could take it seriously.

It was a joke. I've got no interest in banning anybody. It's not my site, and I wouldn't want to be in a position to make important decisions. TBH I didn't even want to turn this into an argument. I thought DD had a hissy fit. I thought it was funny and I thought I'd wind him up a little about it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 06:21:33 PM
Quote
You may have just been joking, Butterflies, but I took Weakling's and your comments seriously at first.  I certainly can see how someone could take it seriously.

It was a joke. I've got no interest in banning anybody. It's not my site, and I wouldn't want to be in a position to make important decisions. TBH I didn't even want to turn this into an argument. I thought DD had a hissy fit. I thought it was funny and I thought I'd wind him up a little about it.

You sound an awful lot like Kit. You two have a lot in common. It's called Mental Retard.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 09, 2010, 06:22:42 PM
Quote
You may have just been joking, Butterflies, but I took Weakling's and your comments seriously at first.  I certainly can see how someone could take it seriously.

It was a joke. I've got no interest in banning anybody. It's not my site, and I wouldn't want to be in a position to make important decisions. TBH I didn't even want to turn this into an argument. I thought DD had a hissy fit. I thought it was funny and I thought I'd wind him up a little about it.

You sound an awful lot like Kit. You two have a lot in common. It's called Mental Retard.

not to keep pouring fuel on the flame but...
you shouldnt make dramatic proclamations of leaving forever, for then to return the same day and post as if nothing happened.

at LEAST wait for an entire month, or so...
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 06:25:08 PM
Quote
You may have just been joking, Butterflies, but I took Weakling's and your comments seriously at first.  I certainly can see how someone could take it seriously.

It was a joke. I've got no interest in banning anybody. It's not my site, and I wouldn't want to be in a position to make important decisions. TBH I didn't even want to turn this into an argument. I thought DD had a hissy fit. I thought it was funny and I thought I'd wind him up a little about it.

You sound an awful lot like Kit. You two have a lot in common. It's called Mental Retard.

not to keep pouring fuel on the flame but...
you shouldnt make dramatic proclamations of leaving forever, for then to return the same day and post as if nothing happened.

at LEAST wait for an entire month, or so...

I'm not following your line of thinking, sorry.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 06:26:20 PM
Quote
You may have just been joking, Butterflies, but I took Weakling's and your comments seriously at first.  I certainly can see how someone could take it seriously.

It was a joke. I've got no interest in banning anybody. It's not my site, and I wouldn't want to be in a position to make important decisions. TBH I didn't even want to turn this into an argument. I thought DD had a hissy fit. I thought it was funny and I thought I'd wind him up a little about it.

You sound an awful lot like Kit. You two have a lot in common. It's called Mental Retard.

not to keep pouring fuel on the flame but...
you shouldnt make dramatic proclamations of leaving forever, for then to return the same day and post as if nothing happened.

at LEAST wait for an entire month, or so...

A YEAR!!

Nah, won't happen.

I didn't really think Weakling was serious about the ban, just annoyed about all the wallpapering. She likes fun as much as the rest of us oldies, but it did get out of hand.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 09, 2010, 06:33:11 PM
Oh shit, was I ever on ignore? I did it too.  But why didn't I think of the ignore function? I'm so retarded.  :laugh:




You do not need to press a button to ignore someone and I can prove it.

How?

You just don't respond to their posts, like the way we did here before we had an ignore function.

Oh I see. But they both spammed up the page and I figured that was the point so people wouldn't want to go back to that thread because it was so hard to deal with and see new posts. So I did it too.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 09, 2010, 06:50:29 PM
I can't BELIEVE I didn't think of this before...I just set meadow to "ignore".

I think it's maybe the most sensible thing to do.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 06:57:32 PM
Morons will always out number intelligent folk. That's what average, and below average, intelligence means. You are the majority.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 09, 2010, 07:04:49 PM
I ended up putting the wallpaper hangers on ignore, but checked occasionally to see if a particular post was clean.  Now I don't have anyone on ignore.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 09, 2010, 07:08:41 PM
In my defense, I only did it in a troll thread. I think you guys know -exactly- why I did it, anyway. This IS a free speech forum by the way, and although meadow has the right to make a statement, so do I. I'm not changing my mind on this. If the admins stop me from fighting this farce one way, i'll just keep finding new ways.

I was fine until I read this thread, but now i'm a little angry. You people need to remember where the fuck you are.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 07:11:06 PM
So, what are we all up to today?

Fishing? Golf? Strolling? Or just plain posting?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 09, 2010, 07:12:12 PM
You're the man for trying to change the supject tco, but I can't let this one go. I'm making a stand.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 07:14:53 PM
You're the man for trying to change the supject tco, but I can't let this one go. I'm making a stand.

Good luck.  :clap:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 07:17:47 PM
I'm having salsa and tortilla chips and watching The Brothers Bloom on Showtime while posting from time to time.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 09, 2010, 07:19:15 PM
You're the man for trying to change the supject tco, but I can't let this one go. I'm making a stand.

Good luck.  :clap:

Don't need it. Eventually the others will lose patience too.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 07:24:18 PM
You're the man for trying to change the supject tco, but I can't let this one go. I'm making a stand.

Good luck.  :clap:

Don't need it. Eventually the others will lose patience too.

That would be something more personal to you I think. Bullying me is YOUR PROBLEM.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 07:26:50 PM
Rage: have a beer  :glug:

My shout.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 09, 2010, 07:27:17 PM
No.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 09, 2010, 07:27:36 PM
I propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc.  that goes on for more than 3 lines. 

My original post was limiting in that allowed some wallpapering (3 lines), but not megawallpapering.  The ban I suggested was temporary.  In reflection I chose the word "automatic" spontaneously.  I really wanted a process of warnings before a temporary ban.

I'm not all that familiar with the ins and outs of bannings since it seems to vary from forum to forum.  

I apologize to you and DirtDawg and anyone else for upsetting you.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 07:36:42 PM
No.

I don't feel sorry for your widdle puppy ass. I have been bullied by ignorant morons all my life because I couldn't speak and was a little bit different that way and for that they literally try to stomp me into the ground. They can't stand anyone who is in any way different than they are. Bullies like you disgust me. I have a right to my anger around the stuff I'm angry about and you are clearly too ignorant to understand that. 1+1=2 widdle dummy.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 07:45:43 PM
Gees, I'd love this to compost:

(http://www.gardenrant.com/.a/6a00d83451bd5e69e201127964f3c628a4-800wi)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 09, 2010, 07:48:20 PM
Gees, I'd love this to compost:

(http://www.gardenrant.com/.a/6a00d83451bd5e69e201127964f3c628a4-800wi)

Do you like composting stuff?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 08:32:18 PM
Gees, I'd love this to compost:

(http://www.gardenrant.com/.a/6a00d83451bd5e69e201127964f3c628a4-800wi)

Do you like composting stuff?

Unfortunately I'm not a gardener. I just wanted to find a Meadow full of shit.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 09, 2010, 08:35:02 PM
In my defense, I only did it in a troll thread. I think you guys know -exactly- why I did it, anyway. This IS a free speech forum by the way, and although meadow has the right to make a statement, so do I. I'm not changing my mind on this. If the admins stop me from fighting this farce one way, i'll just keep finding new ways.

I was fine until I read this thread, but now i'm a little angry. You people need to remember where the fuck you are.


Sorry to be a hypocrite but if you don't like a thread, don't read it. I know it's tempting but at least it gives us something to work on. Trying to stay out of it if you're tired of it. You might fail but it takes practice. I actually agreed what the other users said in that thread regarding the spam after Callaway shortened them.

If people want to feed the troll, their choice.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 09, 2010, 08:35:55 PM
Very little shit in most compost piles, mostly chicken shit.  Looks more like Meadow's brain, disorganized and dead.  MEOW
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 08:39:34 PM
Very little shit in most compost piles, mostly chicken shit.  Looks more like Meadow's brain, disorganized and dead.  MEOW

I s'pose that could have been a years worth of compost, but the smell would have been terrible. As I said, i'm not a gardener.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Meadow on October 09, 2010, 09:06:37 PM
^^^ Ignorant bullies can't take the truth.  :thumbup:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: P7PSP on October 09, 2010, 09:18:06 PM
In my defense, I only did it in a troll thread. I think you guys know -exactly- why I did it, anyway. This IS a free speech forum by the way, and although meadow has the right to make a statement, so do I. I'm not changing my mind on this. If the admins stop me from fighting this farce one way, i'll just keep finding new ways.

I was fine until I read this thread, but now i'm a little angry. You people need to remember where the fuck you are.


Sorry to be a hypocrite but if you don't like a thread, don't read it. I know it's tempting but at least it gives us something to work on. Trying to stay out of it if you're tired of it. You might fail but it takes practice. I actually agreed what the other users said in that thread regarding the spam after Callaway shortened them.

If people want to feed the troll, their choice.
:agreed: I like posting in that thread.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 09, 2010, 09:20:02 PM
(http://www.theprophets.cc/Mine%20Bilder/seagulls%207.jpg)
 :zoinks: :zoinks: :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 09:25:54 PM
(http://www.theprophets.cc/Mine%20Bilder/seagulls%207.jpg)
 :zoinks: :zoinks: :zoinks:

Only problem is you have to watch out for their payload.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: P7PSP on October 09, 2010, 09:27:30 PM
(http://www.theprophets.cc/Mine%20Bilder/seagulls%207.jpg)
 :zoinks: :zoinks: :zoinks:
I don't like trash turkeys but I am impressed with your knowledge of birds Z.  :thumbup:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 09, 2010, 09:28:56 PM
I don't like trash turkeys but I am impressed with your knowledge of birds Z.  :thumbup:

"trash turkeys"?? haha never heard that before

and well, birds are one of my... major obsessions. i havent really categorized my obsessions according to magnitude, but certainly "up there" :D
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 09, 2010, 09:29:51 PM
Speaking of wallpaper, I only have Windows 7's wallpaper of autumn leaves as my desktop. I find it relaxing to look at, even though summer's coming.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: P7PSP on October 09, 2010, 09:30:54 PM
Speaking of wallpaper, I only have Windows 7's wallpaper of autumn leaves as my desktop. I find it relaxing to look at, even though summer's coming.
I have two Kahr pistols as my wallpaper.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 09, 2010, 09:31:13 PM
Speaking of wallpaper, I only have Windows 7's wallpaper of autumn leaves as my desktop. I find it relaxing to look at, even though summer's coming.

summers coming?

are you in BIZARROLAND!?!?!?
or australia? :S
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 09, 2010, 09:31:38 PM
i have plasma as my wallpaper

plasma rawks, rawwwrrr
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 09, 2010, 09:32:26 PM
Speaking of wallpaper, I only have Windows 7's wallpaper of autumn leaves as my desktop. I find it relaxing to look at, even though summer's coming.

summers coming?

are you in BIZARROLAND!?!?!?
or australia? :S

I'm an Aussiefag, yep. 8)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 09:34:54 PM
Speaking of wallpaper, I only have Windows 7's wallpaper of autumn leaves as my desktop. I find it relaxing to look at, even though summer's coming.

summers coming?

are you in BIZARROLAND!?!?!?
or australia? :S

I'm an Aussiefag, yep. 8)

Hooray for us Aussiefags!!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 09, 2010, 09:42:38 PM
Ziggy marley, i take comfort in the fact that you are now using seagulls to your atvantage.

i love dropping crumbs for others to use.  :laugh:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 09, 2010, 09:44:16 PM
Ziggy marley, i take comfort in the fact that you are now using seagulls to your atvantage.

i love dropping crumbs for others to use.  :laugh:

haha your taking credit for something i havent been bothered to remember, but hey

if you say so!  :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 09, 2010, 10:32:05 PM
I have my avatar as wallpaper
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 09, 2010, 10:33:15 PM
Where do I order some wall paper with pink cabbage roses and stripes for my dressing room?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 09, 2010, 10:36:14 PM
Where do I order some wall paper with pink cabbage roses and stripes for my dressing room?

Sherwin Williams, maybe?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 09, 2010, 10:37:33 PM
I have my avatar as wallpaper

Neat. 8)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 09, 2010, 10:39:02 PM
Currently I have a meadow as my wallpaper
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 09, 2010, 10:57:40 PM
Weakiling: I've told you, recency stripes are what you want. Especially for Blennheim Palace.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 09, 2010, 11:37:14 PM
Weakiling: I've told you, recency stripes are what you want. Especially for Blennheim Palace.

I don't have Blenheim Palace.  That's the Churchills.  Just Buckingham Palace, Sandringham and Osborne.  Sandringham is done up in tartan since it's in the highlands.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 10, 2010, 03:16:16 AM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

IMO a ban is to take things too far. Editing them, OTOH, is reasonable since anyone with a slow connection will have problems.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 10, 2010, 03:37:05 AM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

IMO a ban is to take things too far. Editing them, OTOH, is reasonable since anyone with a slow connection will have problems.

Besides, it was just the way Weakling worded it. Slow connections are the bane of everyone's world, and not being able to cope with volumes of stuff would be annoying at the best of times.

The only silly twunts here are Meadow and Razorfag.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 10, 2010, 09:11:24 AM
I see DDs face if illuminated by YHWY. thanks for the stone tablets, we are forever indebted to your sorry ass!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 10, 2010, 11:32:34 AM
I hate it too I will ask O man if I can edit them

YOU and Odeon and Callaway and I forget who else has "privileges,"  CAN indeed edit them if necessary and I would appluad the effort, however, contemplating a rule to ban someone for not being able to express themselves in an appropriate manner is the essence of WP and those twunty sites that would choose to please a few individuals over the collective wisdom of the many which make up a "community."

IMO a ban is to take things too far. Editing them, OTOH, is reasonable since anyone with a slow connection will have problems.

Besides, it was just the way Weakling worded it. Slow connections are the bane of everyone's world, and not being able to cope with volumes of stuff would be annoying at the best of times.

The only silly twunts here are Meadow and Razorfag.

Seriously guys, it is just my ignorance of how forums work.  I'm learning stuff all the time.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 10, 2010, 11:35:38 AM
I think I know why I was excluded from this, I only did it once so perhaps mine went un noticed by you.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 11, 2010, 05:28:31 AM
I'm still not gonna forget this shit. :finger:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 11, 2010, 06:59:27 AM
Oh, FFS, stop sulking already. Accept that most people were as annoyed by the wallpapers and your attempts at shutting down threads as they were by Meadow's little flames, and move on.

And btw--I'm pretty sure Meadow feels better now, seeing that she managed to stir things up.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 11, 2010, 07:05:37 AM
I still don't get why they wouldn't let me destroy her little flames? Whats so important about looking at that shit?

There is no doubt in my mind that meadow would no longer be here if there wasn't so much bitching about how I was doing it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 11, 2010, 07:11:43 AM
Maybe, maybe not. You can't know that. The point is that making the thread impossible to read for others is not OK, it's not your decision to make. It should be for every member to decide for themselves, can't you see that? You may be convinced that Meadow would have left using your method but she could just as well have posted in some other thread instead.

We can't know that but it's not important.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 11, 2010, 07:16:09 AM
Its pretty important to me. And yeah meadow would have posted in other threads for a couple of days, but people would have ignored and ripped on her, and it would have made her leave. Symbols have a lot of power in the human mind, and as long as someone was forcing her out of every single thread she tried to make and only providing the option to be made fun of in other's threads..

It makes a person a lot less powerful. It seems ridiculous, but trust me, i've seen this done tons of times.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 11, 2010, 07:18:02 AM
Goddamit. O-man left. He was the only one taking the time to actually talk about it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 11, 2010, 07:34:03 AM
Whatever, guys. This is why i'm mad.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 11, 2010, 10:35:50 AM
You're fairly full of yourself, on top of that. :orly:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 11, 2010, 10:48:08 AM
You're fairly full of yourself, on top of that. :orly:
I'll bet you wanna be full of me too don't you? :LOL:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 11, 2010, 10:50:52 AM
If I need a living EFG mask, I'll let you know.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 11, 2010, 10:55:03 AM
 :LOL:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 11, 2010, 12:24:14 PM
Its pretty important to me. And yeah meadow would have posted in other threads for a couple of days, but people would have ignored and ripped on her, and it would have made her leave. Symbols have a lot of power in the human mind, and as long as someone was forcing her out of every single thread she tried to make and only providing the option to be made fun of in other's threads..

It makes a person a lot less powerful. It seems ridiculous, but trust me, i've seen this done tons of times.

And trust me, the drama always dies, eventually. Which it's doing now.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 11, 2010, 12:25:02 PM
Goddamit. O-man left. He was the only one taking the time to actually talk about it.

I was at work. Can't spend the whole day posting. :laugh:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Osensitive1 on October 11, 2010, 04:50:39 PM
@Rage. iirc, This thread wasn't started about the spam in Meadow's thread. It was started when you were wallpapering every thread razor started. You made lots of threads unreadable for some people.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 11, 2010, 05:04:55 PM
@Rage. iirc, This thread wasn't started about the spam in Meadow's thread. It was started when you were wallpapering every thread razor started. You made lots of threads unreadable for some people.

You're right, Osensitive1.  I edited lots of picture wallpaper in Razor's threads and that was before I even saw any wallpaper in Meadow's whine thread.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: P7PSP on October 11, 2010, 07:21:06 PM
I'm still not sure if DD was winding us up, or if he was throwing a minor hissy-fit ???
I believe that he was trying to bring up the point that banning someone is not generally a good way to deal with annoyances. The wallpapering pissed me off but banning people for it seems extreme.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 11, 2010, 07:28:25 PM
I'm still not sure if DD was winding us up, or if he was throwing a minor hissy-fit ???
I believe that he was trying to bring up the point that banning someone is not generally a good way to deal with annoyances. The wallpapering pissed me off but banning people for it seems extreme.

The banning Rage thing was a joke, and I'd already said it was at that point. I think DD was hugely overreacting to something that was only a joke.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 11, 2010, 07:37:34 PM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 11, 2010, 07:42:20 PM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)

It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet :laugh: . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Icequeen on October 11, 2010, 07:48:09 PM
My laptop (running Vista :zombiefuck: of all things) never skipped a beat. :zoinks:

Just a thought.  

...is their a script possibly to limit the amount of smileys per post?

Not so much "limit"...maybe just to bring down to a more "manageable" number for those with slow connections, save a hell of alot of editing. :laugh:  

Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 11, 2010, 07:48:19 PM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)

It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet :laugh: . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.

Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 11, 2010, 07:53:41 PM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)

It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet :laugh: . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.

Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.

I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 11, 2010, 08:01:03 PM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)

It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet :laugh: . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.

Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.

I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.

DD can definitely be hard to read. The whole situation seems to have been blown out of proportion, I think.

If you want proof that someone is having a hard time moving on, check Scrapheap.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 11, 2010, 08:05:49 PM
DD is a fucking clown. it always about him, and your all at the carnival!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 11, 2010, 08:06:43 PM
You're his assistant.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 11, 2010, 08:10:20 PM
O rly. well, your my hairy assistant.

i'd veet you off but the internet wont let me
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 11, 2010, 08:11:46 PM
O rly. well, your my hairy assistant.

i'd veet you off but the internet wont let me

Yes, stamp your Veet, richard.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 11, 2010, 08:13:45 PM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)

It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet :laugh: . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.

Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.

I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.

DD can definitely be hard to read. The whole situation seems to have been blown out of proportion, I think.

If you want proof that someone is having a hard time moving on, check Scrapheap.

The banning thing has been blown out of all proportion, up untill today Rage was one of the folk on the site that I liked. I'm not bothered about the DD thing though. I couldn't care less about him, and never liked him to begin with, and I'd imagine he feels the same way about me.

Yeah, the situation with you and Scrapheap does seem to be getting a bit out of control. I'm fairly newish around here, and I don't use WP, so I obviously don't know the history behind things. I hope the pair of you can sort it out. Even if you can't stand each other, it might be a good idea if you can both find a way to stop this.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 11, 2010, 08:17:02 PM
Scrapheap has a tendacy to shoot his foot when trying point out other people's bullshit. He has no consistency and his arrogance clouds his thinking.

Funny since I think he claimed to have an IQ of around 140, yet he's one of the stupider cunts on this forum.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 11, 2010, 08:20:26 PM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)

It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet :laugh: . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.

Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.

I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.

DD can definitely be hard to read. The whole situation seems to have been blown out of proportion, I think.

If you want proof that someone is having a hard time moving on, check Scrapheap.

The banning thing has been blown out of all proportion, up untill today Rage was one of the folk on the site that I liked. I'm not bothered about the DD thing though. I couldn't care less about him, and never liked him to begin with, and I'd imagine he feels the same way about me.

Yeah, the situation with you and Scrapheap does seem to be getting a bit out of control. I'm fairly newish around here, and I don't use WP, so I obviously don't know the history behind things. I hope the pair of you can sort it out. Even if you can't stand each other, it might be a good idea if you can both find a way to stop this.

I had forgotten all about it, and because I don't bother with WP anymore (except for bagging them, which everyone does), it shouldn't be an issue. I was willing to move on, which I thought I had. Seems Scrap is doing a Jethro Tull (see clip) and is acting like a puppy latching onto a bone. Even if we don't sort it out, I ain't gonna lose any friends over it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 11, 2010, 08:21:34 PM
im suprised shleed can even get online at all. why with all the fucking hair he has to move around in
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 11, 2010, 08:22:22 PM
Scrapheap has a tendacy to shoot his foot when trying point out other people's bullshit. He has no consistency and his arrogance clouds his thinking.

Funny since I think he claimed to have an IQ of around 140, yet he's one of the stupider cunts on this forum.

Fuck, the higher they claim their IQ's to be, the lower they are in reality. Remember Illusionist.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 11, 2010, 08:26:29 PM
Scrapheap has a tendacy to shoot his foot when trying point out other people's bullshit. He has no consistency and his arrogance clouds his thinking.

Funny since I think he claimed to have an IQ of around 140, yet he's one of the stupider cunts on this forum.

Fuck, the higher they claim their IQ's to be, the lower they are in reality. Remember Illusionist.

To be honest you need to be consistent yourself. Putting people on ignore to avoid "meltdowns" is generally not a good move.

I wasn't around when Illusionist was here, so I don't know.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 11, 2010, 08:36:55 PM
To be honest, you are more than a bit hairy
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 11, 2010, 08:42:51 PM
Scrapheap has a tendacy to shoot his foot when trying point out other people's bullshit. He has no consistency and his arrogance clouds his thinking.

Funny since I think he claimed to have an IQ of around 140, yet he's one of the stupider cunts on this forum.

Fuck, the higher they claim their IQ's to be, the lower they are in reality. Remember Illusionist.

To be honest you need to be consistent yourself. Putting people on ignore to avoid "meltdowns" is generally not a good move.

I wasn't around when Illusionist was here, so I don't know.

I didn't think there was a rulebook as far as posting on the 'net was concerned. Well, last time I looked there wasn't. Anyway,if he wants to carry on like a 'tard, I can't stop him. And if I fuck up, I fuck up. Words on a screen, as you would say.

Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 11, 2010, 09:36:14 PM
To be honest, you are more than a bit hairy

It's funny that I actually didn't literally notice these posts until now. Is my brain auto-filtering online retardation now? :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 07:35:17 AM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)

It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet :laugh: . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.

Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.

I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.

DD can definitely be hard to read. The whole situation seems to have been blown out of proportion, I think.

If you want proof that someone is having a hard time moving on, check Scrapheap.

The banning thing has been blown out of all proportion, up untill today Rage was one of the folk on the site that I liked. I'm not bothered about the DD thing though. I couldn't care less about him, and never liked him to begin with, and I'd imagine he feels the same way about me.

Yeah, the situation with you and Scrapheap does seem to be getting a bit out of control. I'm fairly newish around here, and I don't use WP, so I obviously don't know the history behind things. I hope the pair of you can sort it out. Even if you can't stand each other, it might be a good idea if you can both find a way to stop this.

I don't like you either. Let me show you what I see. This is why I think you're a petty bitch.

I propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc.  that goes on for more than 3 lines. 

I couldn't agree more. That bugged hell out of me today.
^Truth.

The banning Rage thing was a joke, and I'd already said it was at that point. I think DD was hugely overreacting to something that was only a joke.
^Lie.

Furthermore, and even more irritating....

Modulators, why are you defending Meadow the dragon, while black knights like me and Rage are trying to slay her?
What you and Rage are doing by posting lots of retarded images is done with the intent of preventing others from posting in this thread. How does that conform to this? http://www.intensitysquared.com/ (http://www.intensitysquared.com/) You want to determine what threads we can post in?

I agree. I've always liked Rage, but his wallpapering is pathetic, and I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of it. He doesn't need to read it or be involved in it but he should grow the fuck up and let other people make up their own minds as to what threads they want to read, or contribute to.

And yet short while later...

I'm going to flush out the shoutbox so that at least she doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that. Could we avoid arguing about this where she can see please.

Quote
but his wallpapering is pathetic, and I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of it

Quote
I'm going to flush out the shoutbox so that at least she doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that. Could we avoid arguing about this where she can see please.


Now see what I see, and see why I am so angry with you. You're dishonest.



Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 12, 2010, 07:37:22 AM
Rage is gonna RAGE. :orly:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 07:38:16 AM
Well? You see what i'm saying right? Shes fucking full of shit, dude.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 12, 2010, 07:44:15 AM
Sadly I agree with a lot of what she says.

Maybe if you didn't act like a complete eejit after being criticized for it, maybe you two would still be friends.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 07:49:18 AM
Sadly I agree with a lot of what she says.

Maybe if you didn't act like a complete eejit after being criticized for it, maybe you two would still be friends.

Problem is, I don't agree. Especially since she turned around and did the exact same thing I did after bitching about it, and trying to get me banned. I'm no fool, and I know a liar when I see one.

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_g7KcbMxmLEU/R8piYpxIn2I/AAAAAAAADqI/0FkcQjIgZJk/s400/JachNicolson.jpg)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 12, 2010, 08:54:24 AM
If Butterflies lies like this on the Internet... then I can't imagine how much of a lying bitch she is in real life. :orly:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 10:19:35 AM
It sucks when you joke about something, people take you seriously and then they refuse to believe you when you tell them you were joking.  ::)

It does. Sarcasm never seems to work when you're writing on the internet :laugh: . Thing is, when I wrote it I still liked Rage and would have been totally against the idea of banning him if it had been a serious suggestion.

Some of my sarcasm has fallen foul when some some people didn't understand it. I think most people here have gotten my jokes OK, but there could be some exceptions.

I thought most knew, at least by now that it had been a joke. I think Rage just wants to sulk, and I didn't like DDs responses to Weakling, Soph or myself one bit.

DD can definitely be hard to read. The whole situation seems to have been blown out of proportion, I think.

If you want proof that someone is having a hard time moving on, check Scrapheap.

The banning thing has been blown out of all proportion, up untill today Rage was one of the folk on the site that I liked. I'm not bothered about the DD thing though. I couldn't care less about him, and never liked him to begin with, and I'd imagine he feels the same way about me.

Yeah, the situation with you and Scrapheap does seem to be getting a bit out of control. I'm fairly newish around here, and I don't use WP, so I obviously don't know the history behind things. I hope the pair of you can sort it out. Even if you can't stand each other, it might be a good idea if you can both find a way to stop this.

I don't like you either. Let me show you what I see. This is why I think you're a petty bitch.

I propose an automatic temporary ban of 1 week for anyone who posts a picture, smiley, space, etc.  that goes on for more than 3 lines. 

I couldn't agree more. That bugged hell out of me today.
^Truth.

The banning Rage thing was a joke, and I'd already said it was at that point. I think DD was hugely overreacting to something that was only a joke.
^Lie.

Furthermore, and even more irritating....

Modulators, why are you defending Meadow the dragon, while black knights like me and Rage are trying to slay her?
What you and Rage are doing by posting lots of retarded images is done with the intent of preventing others from posting in this thread. How does that conform to this? http://www.intensitysquared.com/ (http://www.intensitysquared.com/) You want to determine what threads we can post in?

I agree. I've always liked Rage, but his wallpapering is pathetic, and I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of it. He doesn't need to read it or be involved in it but he should grow the fuck up and let other people make up their own minds as to what threads they want to read, or contribute to.

And yet short while later...

I'm going to flush out the shoutbox so that at least she doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that. Could we avoid arguing about this where she can see please.

Quote
but his wallpapering is pathetic, and I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of it

Quote
I'm going to flush out the shoutbox so that at least she doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that. Could we avoid arguing about this where she can see please.


Now see what I see, and see why I am so angry with you. You're dishonest.




I still don't see the dishonesty TBH.

I think you're a sad little man who lives with his mum and needs to grow a pair.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 10:26:33 AM
If you can't see it, then I have nothing else to say.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 10:28:26 AM
If you can't see it, then I have nothing else to say.

You could tell me where I've been dishonest and possibly salvage a modicum of my respect.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 12, 2010, 10:30:43 AM
I think he means where u said to Weakling "I couldn't agree more" after she said to ban. It looks like you're saying to ban him and then saying you didn't

I don't think you are being dishnonest btw- just that that is probably the bit he means
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 10:33:46 AM
I think he means where u said to Weakling "I couldn't agree more" after she said to ban. It looks like you're saying to ban him and then saying you didn't

I don't think you are being dishnonest btw- just that that is probably the bit he means

That was a joke. I said a few posts later that I thought Weakling was joking. I then said, a page or two later on that I did not wan't to see Rage or Mudkipz banned.

No dishonesty at all. Just a stupid joke that Rage seems unable to get over.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 12, 2010, 10:35:32 AM
YUeah I know you didn't want him banned really - I don';t think anyone did tbh, except maybe Weakling lol
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 10:37:29 AM
YUeah I know you didn't want him banned really - I don';t think anyone did tbh, except maybe Weakling lol

I don't even think Weakling really wanted them banned. I think she maybe wanted them to get a warning.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 12, 2010, 10:39:07 AM
@ Rage & Butterflies: let's just say I like you guys alot, and therefore I don't want to see you two fighting. Therefore, this is one fence I will have to sit on from now, however painful the barbed wire may be.

I DO hope you work it out, though.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 12, 2010, 10:39:45 AM
maybe this is all just a big aspie fuck-up - everyone seems to be misunderstanding everyone else :tinfoil:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 12, 2010, 10:42:29 AM
maybe this is all just a big aspie fuck-up - everyone seems to be misunderstanding everyone else :tinfoil:

That could well be it too.  :plus:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 10:46:39 AM
maybe this is all just a big aspie fuck-up - everyone seems to be misunderstanding everyone else :tinfoil:

 :indeed: But although I'd be happy to put this behind us. I always make jokes that are taken the wrong way. I really wouldn't want to be friends with somebody who is that sensitive. It would be a recipe for disaster.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 10:48:06 AM
I'm not misunderstanding shit. After making a big fucking deal about my spam, she turned around and did the SAME THING, and for the SAME REASON.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 12, 2010, 10:48:43 AM
butterflies spammed?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 12, 2010, 10:48:57 AM
maybe this is all just a big aspie fuck-up - everyone seems to be misunderstanding everyone else :tinfoil:

 :indeed: But although I'd be happy to put this behind us. I always make jokes that are taken the wrong way. I really wouldn't want to be friends with somebody who is that sensitive. It would be a recipe for disaster.

Be wary of me then, it's not sensitivity that makes me potentially volatile, it's my paranoia.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 12, 2010, 10:49:46 AM
Damn, while disabling that post warning is nice and all, if the thread is fast paced, yeah, really need to quote more.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 10:50:50 AM
butterflies spammed?

I really don't understand that either ???
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 10:51:52 AM
butterflies spammed?

Sure did.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 10:52:44 AM
butterflies spammed?

Sure did.

Spammed or wallpapered? ???
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 12, 2010, 10:53:44 AM
I thought the term for it was crapflooding, not wallpaper.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 10:55:26 AM
butterflies spammed?

Sure did.

Spammed or wallpapered? ???

Same thing. You filled something up, so people couldn't see it.

Didn't you?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 10:58:36 AM
butterflies spammed?

Sure did.

Spammed or wallpapered? ???

Same thing.

No it's not. I haven't complained about people spamming. I've complained about you wallpapering.

Where have I ever wallpapered?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 11:09:38 AM
Yes, it is. You filled something up so nobody could see it. Same intention, same results. You just put a different name on there and tell yourself its different. Another lie.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 11:20:03 AM
Yes, it is. You filled something up so nobody could see it. Same intention, same results. You just put a different name on there and tell yourself its different. Another lie.

Do you mean when I was pretending to be Temple? No, that wasn't fucking with anybodys modem ASAIK. And I wasn't stopping anybody else viewing the thread.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 11:28:02 AM
Nope, wasn't it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 12, 2010, 11:28:11 AM
omg. :LMAO:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 11:31:53 AM
Nope, wasn't it.

Remember. A lot of people were making the decision to talk random nonsense all around her.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 11:36:11 AM
No. You flooded the shoutbox so nobody would see an argument.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 11:39:23 AM
No. You flooded the shoutbox so nobody would see an argument.

Oh right. I did do that. It was however only one smiley per line, and I thought it might be a bit embarrasing if Meadow saw the big arguments.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 12, 2010, 11:39:50 AM
i've never been in the shoutbox. is it really all thats its made up to be?

should i be in there
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 12, 2010, 11:40:52 AM
i've never been in the shoutbox. is it really all thats its made up to be?

should i be in there

the shoutbox is a whole new wondrous world of wonder and wondrous wonder!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 11:44:37 AM
No. You flooded the shoutbox so nobody would see an argument.

Oh right. I did do that. It was however only one smiley per line, and I thought it might be a bit embarrasing if Meadow saw the big arguments.

Excuses? You're the childish one. Just admit you fucked up.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 11:52:01 AM
No. You flooded the shoutbox so nobody would see an argument.

Oh right. I did do that. It was however only one smiley per line, and I thought it might be a bit embarrasing if Meadow saw the big arguments.

Excuses? You're the childish one. Just admit you fucked up.

I didn't think this was even about wallpaper anymore.

I thought this was about me being a bitch and trying to get you banned :wanker:

It's a bit pathetic you moaning about me flooding the shoutbox once, when you've wallpapered loads of Razorbeards threads and bugged a lot of people.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 12, 2010, 11:52:49 AM
:LMAO:

Lovely picture.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 12, 2010, 11:55:07 AM
Butterflies, do you like to fantasize about two men getting it on? Oh, and I have noticed something funny about your avatar. If you zoom in, you will notice it. See, look:

(http://i632.photobucket.com/albums/uu49/bydemonsbedriven/lol_butterflies.jpg)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 12, 2010, 11:58:58 AM
So you're saying she's awesome? :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 12, 2010, 11:58:59 AM
Butterflies, do you like to fantasize about two men getting it on? Oh, and I have noticed something funny about your avatar. If you zoom in, you will notice it. See, look:

(http://i632.photobucket.com/albums/uu49/bydemonsbedriven/lol_butterflies.jpg)
:LMAO: :plus:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 12:03:28 PM
No. Its about you trying to get me banned, then doing the same thing you tried to get me banned for.

No matter how much you church it up, fact is fact. I can't prove you lied about the banning, but I have proof of your spamming. I'm done talking now. Maybe in time you can get your ego out of the way and own up.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 12, 2010, 12:04:50 PM
my kitten keeps farting :(
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 12:13:00 PM
Butterflies, do you like to fantasize about two men getting it on? Oh, and I have noticed something funny about your avatar. If you zoom in, you will notice it. See, look:

(http://i632.photobucket.com/albums/uu49/bydemonsbedriven/lol_butterflies.jpg)

Actually. That's rather sweet :plus:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 12:37:40 PM
No. Its about you trying to get me banned, then doing the same thing you tried to get me banned for.

No matter how much you church it up, fact is fact. I can't prove you lied about the banning, but I have proof of your spamming. I'm done talking now. Maybe in time you can get your ego out of the way and own up.

.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 12:50:20 PM
Are you trying to get me to laugh and forget it? Nope.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 12:54:45 PM
Are you trying to get me to laugh and forget it? Nope.

No Rage. You're far more fun when you're sulking.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 12, 2010, 12:55:29 PM
Hey, Butter-on-your-fly, here's a painting I just did of you! Will you marry me now? :eyelash:



(http://i632.photobucket.com/albums/uu49/bydemonsbedriven/butterflies_man.jpg)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 12:57:53 PM
Hey, Butter-on-your-fly, here's a painting I just did of you! Will you marry me now? :eyelash:



(http://i632.photobucket.com/albums/uu49/bydemonsbedriven/butterflies_man.jpg)

Not sure about marry you, but that's quite a cool pic. Makes me look like a purple haired Guy Fawkes :2thumbsup:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 12:59:42 PM
Are you trying to get me to laugh and forget it? Nope.

No Rage. You're far more fun when you're sulking.
Right.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 12, 2010, 01:02:33 PM
Hey, Butter-on-your-fly, here's a painting I just did of you! Will you marry me now? :eyelash:



(http://i632.photobucket.com/albums/uu49/bydemonsbedriven/butterflies_man.jpg)

Not sure about marry you, but that's quite a cool pic. Makes me look like a purple haired Guy Fawkes :2thumbsup:

Speaking of Guy Fucks, is that jizz on your chest? :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 12, 2010, 01:03:15 PM
I can't wait till bonfire night. I hope we get some good fireworks this year  :green:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: ZEGH8578 on October 12, 2010, 01:05:01 PM
I can't wait till bonfire night. I hope we get some good fireworks this year  :green:

hidden propane tanks + bonfire = best fireworks ever

just sayin  :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 12, 2010, 01:05:58 PM
Rofl.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: richard on October 12, 2010, 01:58:58 PM
thanks for the laugh you guys. those pictures are funny
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 12, 2010, 03:12:59 PM
My laptop (running Vista :zombiefuck: of all things) never skipped a beat. :zoinks:

Just a thought.  

...is their a script possibly to limit the amount of smileys per post?

Not so much "limit"...maybe just to bring down to a more "manageable" number for those with slow connections, save a hell of alot of editing. :laugh:  



:plus:

Excellent idea. Unfortunately the mods I found won't work with our version of SMF.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 12, 2010, 03:15:59 PM
maybe this is all just a big aspie fuck-up - everyone seems to be misunderstanding everyone else :tinfoil:

Sounds likely.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 12, 2010, 03:19:03 PM
BTW:



[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 03:24:36 PM
maybe this is all just a big aspie fuck-up - everyone seems to be misunderstanding everyone else :tinfoil:

Sounds likely.

It is. I was joking about the banning. I do however, find the fallout from it rather amusing :laugh:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 12, 2010, 03:26:30 PM
I'm tired of the drama, though.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 12, 2010, 03:27:31 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4c7V0LjVNA
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 12, 2010, 04:19:00 PM
I'm tired of the drama, though.


I think the drama should have ended a long time ago. It's clear Rage isn't going to believe butterflies so she should just drop it and move on and not care what he thinks after she had told him it was a joke.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 12, 2010, 04:21:06 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=em328ua_Lo8
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 04:27:36 PM
I'm tired of the drama, though.


I think the drama should have ended a long time ago. It's clear Rage isn't going to believe butterflies so she should just drop it and move on and not care what he thinks after she had told him it was a joke.

You are right. But, if he says stuff to me, or about me that I don't like then I will retaliate.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 12, 2010, 05:41:59 PM
Those pics were hilarious. Some people definitely have their A levels in Photoshop.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 12, 2010, 05:52:13 PM
Those pics were hilarious. Some people definitely have their A levels in Photoshop.

Mine were made with Paint, and I've never used it before. They looked very amateurish :laugh: . Mudkipz showed that he can draw a little bit, which did surprise me. I thought the one of me with the big eyes and mouth was actually kind of nice.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Osensitive1 on October 12, 2010, 06:19:04 PM
i've never been in the shoutbox. is it really all thats its made up to be?

should i be in there
Never been there either and have only looked at it a couple of times, but now wonder what was going on in there.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 12, 2010, 06:42:25 PM
Those pics were hilarious. Some people definitely have their A levels in Photoshop.

Mine were made with Paint, and I've never used it before. They looked very amateurish :laugh: . Mudkipz showed that he can draw a little bit, which did surprise me. I thought the one of me with the big eyes and mouth was actually kind of nice.

My only attempts at Paint were a couple of desktops I made at work, one of the Union Jack with Rue Britannia on the middle, and one of the Rolling Stones mouth. Oh, I did try one of the Collingwood magpie, but I don't think it was that good.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 12, 2010, 10:58:40 PM
I'm tired of the drama, though.


I think the drama should have ended a long time ago. It's clear Rage isn't going to believe butterflies so she should just drop it and move on and not care what he thinks after she had told him it was a joke.

You are right. But, if he says stuff to me, or about me that I don't like then I will retaliate.

What I learned three years ago was "who cares that they think" it's a waste of time of energy to fight and argue with someone when they don't believe you, same as trying to convince them you are telling the truth so they'll believe you. So I told myself I wasn't going to even care anymore if that happens again and I don't keep on arguing with someone about it. I don't even bother to post links or photos to prove I am for real if anyone says I am a fake or a troll because why should I if I don't care? They can still say those are fake.

Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 13, 2010, 12:52:50 AM
And the drama continues... :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 05:51:35 AM
The pics were funny, i'll admit. How about you back up your words instead of doodling though? I backed up mine.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 13, 2010, 05:52:21 AM
Those pics were hilarious. Some people definitely have their A levels in Photoshop.

Mine were made with Paint, and I've never used it before. They looked very amateurish :laugh: . Mudkipz showed that he can draw a little bit, which did surprise me. I thought the one of me with the big eyes and mouth was actually kind of nice.

The last one I made, was actually made in Paint.NET, I got it to look like a painting by enlarging it and putting a "frosted glass" effect on it. I'm no drawer, but I can draw better on paper.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 13, 2010, 08:12:27 AM
And the drama continues... :zoinks:

Yeah, but it sounds like summer re-runs.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 13, 2010, 08:16:20 AM
And the drama continues... :zoinks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZYa_KfLTtM

 :asthing:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 08:22:53 AM
Quote
I agree. I've always liked Rage, but his wallpapering is pathetic

Another word for spamming.

Quote
I think it smacks of control freakery by trying to stop other people using a thread because he disapproves of it.

It does. Deal with it. And don't turn around and do the same fucking thing. Like below.

Quote
He doesn't need to read it or be involved in it but he should grow the fuck up and let other people make up their own minds as to what threads they want to read, or contribute to.

Quote
own minds as to what threads they want to read, or contribute to.

Quote
I'm going to flush out the shoutbox so that at least she doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that. Could we avoid arguing about this where she can see please.

Quote
]I'm going to flush out the shoutbox

Quote
doesn't get the satisfaction of seeing that


Basically folks, lemme put all this together in a single quote. REEEEMIX.

Quote
I agree. I've always liked Rage, but his wallpapering is pathetic. I'm better than he is, therefore i'll call it flushing instead and wait till he protests us censoring HIM, then spam the shit out of it. Then when he says something about it, i'll do little doodles of him having gay sex, because he's straight and I bet it'll piss him off because I can't come up with a defense for this.  :green:


Oh yeah. Sounds like someone who can call someone ELSE childish.


Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 13, 2010, 08:50:31 AM
That's kind of what I was thinking myself. It just wasn't clear until you translated what Butterflies said into English, Rage.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 08:52:20 AM
Indeed.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 09:48:03 AM
The pics were funny, i'll admit. How about you back up your words instead of doodling though? I backed up mine.

I'm not sure how I'm supposed to back up my words. I said you should be banned. It was a joke. I've no way of proving it was a joke.

However, I do know how this site works, and I know that bans are not handed out, unless for the most serious of offences. To have been serious about calling for a ban would have been stupid and clearly doomed to failure. At the time I wrote it I actually liked you and would not have wanted to see you banned. It was before I realized what a small petty boy you really are.


[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 09:54:25 AM
Like I said, I can't prove that, but can and did prove you're an egotistical hypocrite.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 10:09:32 AM
Like I said, I can't prove that, but can and did prove you're an egotistical hypocrite.

Kit's right. There's no point in me arguing with you about this anymore. You can believe me or you can choose not to believe me. I really don't care.

You're a sad little man who lives with his mum, while talking on the internet about how you're hard as nails. Somehow, I think you may be over compinsating for something you lack in real life. Maybe you're a total coward, you might be scared of women, or perhaps you just have an incredibly small penis.

You don't like me. I don't like you. Maybe you should just grow a pair and move on.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 10:16:36 AM
At least I use facts in my arguments. All you seem to do is pull a bunch of ambiguous shit out of the air to try and insult me with, an stick my face in gay porn.

Yeah. You're so cool and mature.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 10:27:57 AM
At least I use facts in my arguments. All you seem to do is pull a bunch of ambiguous shit out of the air to try and insult me with, an stick my face in gay porn.

Yeah. You're so cool and mature.

I said what I said. There's no denying it, and I haven't tried to.

I can't understand why you're still going on about it. If you believe I was serious then why don't you just move on and forget about me. I think you're just a sensitive little boy who's butthurt that someone disagreed with him. You even argued with cbc, because she disagreed with you. You're probably the only person on the site who's argued with her.

You're just a typical internet tough guy, who throws his toys out of the pram when people disagree with you.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 10:32:05 AM
Turn the mirror around.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 10:46:25 AM
Turn the mirror around.

I don't think there's all that much more either of us can say. I'm not interested in the argument about spamming or banning any more. I think most of the others have grown tired of our argument anyway.

If you continue to try and argue with me, or write stuff about me, then I'll just end up saying nasty stuff to you. And this whole thing is only going to bug everyone else on the site.

It really would be best to move on.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 13, 2010, 10:50:35 AM
Like I said, I can't prove that, but can and did prove you're an egotistical hypocrite.

Projecting much?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 10:58:53 AM
Like I said, I can't prove that, but can and did prove you're an egotistical hypocrite.

Projecting much?

No. :)

Also, I never give in Butterflies. You fucked up, then tried to hide it.

I'll keep rubbing your face in it until you admit it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 10:59:39 AM
Like I said, I can't prove that, but can and did prove you're an egotistical hypocrite.

Projecting much?

No. :)

Also, I never give in Butterflies. You fucked up, then tried to hide it.

I'll keep rubbing your face in it until you admit it.

 :wanker: :hahaha: :wanker:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 11:16:24 AM
 ::) :violin:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 13, 2010, 11:41:49 AM
And the drama continues... :zoinks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZYa_KfLTtM

 :asthing:


I used to watch that in 7th grade until BBC America stopped showing it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 13, 2010, 11:43:11 AM
Indeed.


Oh I get it, the spamming you were talking about was what she did in the shoutbox?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 11:45:09 AM
 :indeed:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 13, 2010, 12:05:48 PM
She admited she did that though

I think there is still a big difference between that (although I admit I never really go in the shoutbox) and making loads of threads load slowly
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 12:13:38 PM
She admited she did that though

I think there is still a big difference between that (although I admit I never really go in the shoutbox) and making loads of threads load slowly

I did it because the shoutbox was full of an argument. I thought it would have been embarrasing if Meadow saw it and realized thetrouble she'd caused. I flushed out the argument by putting one smillie on each line.

I am sorry to anybody whos computer or modem was slowed by it. I didn't even think it was possible to slow down peoples computers  by doing what I done. The shoutbox is always full. I just changed it so that it was full of something else.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 13, 2010, 12:15:15 PM
I once posted a link on Aspergic in the shout box and I was so dense I didn't even know it was a porn link. I mean I didn't see any naked photos in there and all the pictures were hidden because for them to appear, I have to have certain amount of people click on it so more photos open up and the woman was full clothed. I just wanted to see if it actually works so I posted the link and then I had a PM from one of the mods asking me why did I post a porn link and I said I didn't. I even saw that the mod had spammed the inbox to get rid of the link and I got into an argument with another member there about the link. He was saying it was a porn link and I was saying it was not because there was no naked photos. No one can see the pictures. He was saying it was a pay site and I was saying it was not because you need people to click the link to open more pictures to see.

Well after finally understanding, I felt stupid and embarrassed. I mean it then looked obvious on the page when I kept looking at it after the user explained it to me during our argument and I was like "oh, doh" and felt dumb. Why didn't I see it before or even understand?  ::)

I was lucky I didn't get banned.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 13, 2010, 12:17:24 PM
She admited she did that though

I think there is still a big difference between that (although I admit I never really go in the shoutbox) and making loads of threads load slowly

I did it because the shoutbox was full of an argument. I thought it would have been embarrasing if Meadow saw it and realized thetrouble she'd caused. I flushed out the argument by putting one smillie on each line.

I am sorry to anybody whos computer or modem was slowed by it. I didn't even think it was possible to slow down peoples computers  by doing what I done. The shoutbox is always full. I just changed it so that it was full of something else.


How does posting smileys slow down peoples computers?

And I am curious what was said about Meadow in it. Rage wouldn't show me the chat when I asked.

So you didn't want Meadow to be embarrassed if she saw what she caused?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 13, 2010, 12:20:19 PM
No, Meadow SHOULD see what trouble she causes with her fucking idiotic posts full of rage and hatred. Butterflies, you really should have fucked off instead of adding to the problem!

Oh, and you, once again, are a tool, Kit! ::)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 13, 2010, 12:22:04 PM
Like I said, I can't prove that, but can and did prove you're an egotistical hypocrite.

Projecting much?

No. :)

Also, I never give in Butterflies. You fucked up, then tried to hide it.

I'll keep rubbing your face in it until you admit it.

Until he says she did it even thought she didn't. I've checked the posts and I see no proof of any lying.

Rage, couldn't you at least not be such a dickhead?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 13, 2010, 12:23:42 PM
No, Meadow SHOULD see what trouble she causes with her fucking idiotic posts full of rage and hatred. Butterflies, you really should have fucked off instead of adding to the problem!

Oh, and you, once again, are a tool, Kit! ::)

Kit's not a tool.

Do you think it's wise to let a narcissist know if she's causing trouble?

Wouldn't she get her attention fix that way?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 13, 2010, 12:25:26 PM
I don't think what butterflies did is comparable tbh

Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 13, 2010, 12:29:24 PM
I don't think what butterflies did is comparable tbh



I have to agree.  How many smileys would it take to push an argument out of a shoutbox, anyway?  Maybe ten or so?

How many threads got wallpapered with more than that many pictures each?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Callaway on October 13, 2010, 12:31:36 PM
She admited she did that though

I think there is still a big difference between that (although I admit I never really go in the shoutbox) and making loads of threads load slowly

I did it because the shoutbox was full of an argument. I thought it would have been embarrasing if Meadow saw it and realized thetrouble she'd caused. I flushed out the argument by putting one smillie on each line.

I am sorry to anybody whos computer or modem was slowed by it. I didn't even think it was possible to slow down peoples computers  by doing what I done. The shoutbox is always full. I just changed it so that it was full of something else.


How does posting smileys slow down peoples computers?

And I am curious what was said about Meadow in it. Rage wouldn't show me the chat when I asked.

So you didn't want Meadow to be embarrassed if she saw what she caused?

I think it would depend on how many smileys were posted and how fast the person's computer is.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 12:32:23 PM
Quote
So you didn't want Meadow to be embarrassed if she saw what she caused?

When I done it I was convinced Meadow was a troll who was trying to cause trouble. I didn't want her to see she had been succesfull. I now realize Meadow probably isn't a troll, but a severely disturbed person.

Quote
And I am curious what was said about Meadow in it. Rage wouldn't show me the chat when I asked.

I don't know everything that was in it. There was probably nothing much in it about Meadow. Rage said that he'd logged it, so he'll know better than me what was in it. The stuff I remember was Rage arguing with everyone who disagreed with him about his wallpapering. He seemed to be fighting everybody. He appeared to be having a meltdown iirc. That is probably why he wont show it to you.

Quote
How does posting smileys slow down peoples computers?

I didn't think it did. I think Rage is just butthurt because I didn't agree with his wallpapering and he is determined to say that I've done the same thing.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 13, 2010, 12:34:34 PM
No, Meadow SHOULD see what trouble she causes with her fucking idiotic posts full of rage and hatred. Butterflies, you really should have fucked off instead of adding to the problem!

Oh, and you, once again, are a tool, Kit! ::)

Kit's not a tool.

Do you think it's wise to let a narcissist know if she's causing trouble?

Wouldn't she get her attention fix that way?

I meant to say that she was a tool kit for falling for that "get clicks to see more pictures scheme". Not in general.

And Butterflies's reasoning was that she didn't want Meadow to get embarrassed by the trouble she is making, not... uh...

Oh could someone please get me a translator so that I can understand what the fuck Butterflies is saying?!?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 12:36:41 PM
It is the same, and i'm not explaining it again. She just admitted it anyway. Game over, far as i'm concerned.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 12:37:40 PM
She admited she did that though

I think there is still a big difference between that (although I admit I never really go in the shoutbox) and making loads of threads load slowly

I did it because the shoutbox was full of an argument. I thought it would have been embarrasing if Meadow saw it and realized thetrouble she'd caused. I flushed out the argument by putting one smillie on each line.

I am sorry to anybody whos computer or modem was slowed by it. I didn't even think it was possible to slow down peoples computers  by doing what I done. The shoutbox is always full. I just changed it so that it was full of something else.


How does posting smileys slow down peoples computers?

And I am curious what was said about Meadow in it. Rage wouldn't show me the chat when I asked.

So you didn't want Meadow to be embarrassed if she saw what she caused?

I think it would depend on how many smileys were posted and how fast the person's computer is.

I posted one smilie per line. Maybe around 30 in all. As it was replacing text anyway I can't see how it could have slowed any computers.

I thought I was doing it for a good reason. I do think Meadow would have been happy if she'd seen everyone on the site fighting. I thought it would be a better idea if we done our fighting away from where she could see it.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 12:39:03 PM

And Butterflies's reasoning was that she didn't want Meadow to get embarrassed by the trouble she is making, not... uh...


 :facepalm2: :facepalm2: :facepalm2:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 12:42:16 PM
It is the same, and i'm not explaining it again. She just admitted it anyway. Game over, far as i'm concerned.

Of course I admitted it. I announced I was doing it at the time :facepalm2: :facepalm2:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 13, 2010, 12:45:19 PM
I still don't get this at all

And Rage I am not having a go at you - I have been an arse on this site plenty of times myself (trolling, spamming etc)

but this just doesn't make sens to me at all

The shoutbox thing didn't slow down anyone's computers, and that was whatr the whole issue was with the wallpaper
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: RageBeoulve on October 13, 2010, 12:50:36 PM
I can see this won't end. Fine. You are still making excuses, even after admission. Wait till I get to a keyboard. You'll see. ;)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 12:53:04 PM
I can see this won't end. Fine. You are still making excuses, even after admission. Wait till I get to a keyboard. You'll see. ;)

I wasn't trying to hide it. I told people I was doing it before I  posted the smileys.

Quote
Wait till I get to a keyboard. You'll see. ;)

What is that supposed to mean ???
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 13, 2010, 12:56:52 PM
:popcorn:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 13, 2010, 12:57:31 PM
I can see this won't end. Fine. You are still making excuses, even after admission. Wait till I get to a keyboard. You'll see. ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J---aiyznGQ

Am I right?  :zoinks:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 13, 2010, 12:57:48 PM
Rage had similar issues with bint etc in the past, even though he caused it himself. He's too arrogant to listen, even if it's the blatant truth.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 13, 2010, 01:08:38 PM

And Butterflies's reasoning was that she didn't want Meadow to get embarrassed by the trouble she is making, not... uh...


 :facepalm2: :facepalm2: :facepalm2:

Butterflies, let me tell you right now: I do NOT need your fucking pity.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 01:19:02 PM
Rage had similar issues with bint etc in the past, even though he caused it himself. He's too arrogant to listen, even if it's the blatant truth.

I think Rages problem stems back to the Meadow thread. He seemed to take it really badly that people were disagreeing with him about his use of wallpaper to get rid of trolls. For some reason he seems to have appointed himself Troll Killer of I2. I think he sees himself as some kind of internet\troll expert and was unable to handle any criticism about his methods.

His behaviour really starts to get interesting on page 3.

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,15014.0.html
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 01:22:07 PM

And Butterflies's reasoning was that she didn't want Meadow to get embarrassed by the trouble she is making, not... uh...


 :facepalm2: :facepalm2: :facepalm2:

Butterflies, let me tell you right now: I do NOT need your fucking pity.

Well Mudkipz. After seeing your picture, listening to you talking about your family circumstances, and hearing of your hopeless life with no prospects for the future it's hard not to feel a lot of pity for you.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 13, 2010, 02:04:44 PM
Rage had similar issues with bint etc in the past, even though he caused it himself. He's too arrogant to listen, even if it's the blatant truth.

I think Rages problem stems back to the Meadow thread. He seemed to take it really badly that people were disagreeing with him about his use of wallpaper to get rid of trolls. For some reason he seems to have appointed himself Troll Killer of I2. I think he sees himself as some kind of internet\troll expert and was unable to handle any criticism about his methods.

His behaviour really starts to get interesting on page 3.

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,15014.0.html


What I am confused about is you say you cleaned out the shout box so Meadow won't see the trouble she has caused and then here you say you did it so she wouldn't feel embarrassed. Did I read that right?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Squidusa on October 13, 2010, 02:06:02 PM
Rage had similar issues with bint etc in the past, even though he caused it himself. He's too arrogant to listen, even if it's the blatant truth.

I think Rages problem stems back to the Meadow thread. He seemed to take it really badly that people were disagreeing with him about his use of wallpaper to get rid of trolls. For some reason he seems to have appointed himself Troll Killer of I2. I think he sees himself as some kind of internet\troll expert and was unable to handle any criticism about his methods.

His behaviour really starts to get interesting on page 3.

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,15014.0.html


What I am confused about is you say you cleaned out the shout box so Meadow won't see the trouble she has caused and then here you say you did it so she wouldn't feel embarrassed. Did I read that right?

no the embarrasment would be ours , because meadow would have seen the damage shes done.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 13, 2010, 02:33:19 PM
It really would be best to move on.

Then do it, instead of posting yet another picture showing that your words mean nothing.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 02:34:00 PM
Rage had similar issues with bint etc in the past, even though he caused it himself. He's too arrogant to listen, even if it's the blatant truth.

I think Rages problem stems back to the Meadow thread. He seemed to take it really badly that people were disagreeing with him about his use of wallpaper to get rid of trolls. For some reason he seems to have appointed himself Troll Killer of I2. I think he sees himself as some kind of internet\troll expert and was unable to handle any criticism about his methods.

His behaviour really starts to get interesting on page 3.

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,15014.0.html


What I am confused about is you say you cleaned out the shout box so Meadow won't see the trouble she has caused and then here you say you did it so she wouldn't feel embarrassed. Did I read that right?

no the embarrasment would be ours , because meadow would have seen the damage shes done.

Exactly as the Squid says. :indeed:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 02:36:31 PM
It really would be best to move on.

Then do it, instead of posting yet another picture showing that your words mean nothing.

 :razz: :moon: :razz:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 13, 2010, 02:39:02 PM
Thing is *both* of you react like the spazzes you are. Neither wants to simply stop doing this. Who cares about the wall of pictures now? Ancient history, as far as I'm concerned. Who cares about Butterflies flooding the shout box (which doesn't take much, btw)? Ancient history.

Sometimes it's better to simply stop and realise that you are electrons on a screen, nothing more.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 13, 2010, 02:39:25 PM
It really would be best to move on.

Then do it, instead of posting yet another picture showing that your words mean nothing.

 :razz: :moon: :razz:

Your point being?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 13, 2010, 02:40:37 PM
hi

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 02:42:19 PM
Thing is *both* of you react like the spazzes you are. Neither wants to simply stop doing this. Who cares about the wall of pictures now? Ancient history, as far as I'm concerned. Who cares about Butterflies flooding the shout box (which doesn't take much, btw)? Ancient history.

Sometimes it's better to simply stop and realise that you are electrons on a screen, nothing more.

I'm very happy to stop this. But if Rage starts going on about it again then I probably will respond.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 13, 2010, 02:43:40 PM
hello

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 13, 2010, 02:45:27 PM
Thing is *both* of you react like the spazzes you are. Neither wants to simply stop doing this. Who cares about the wall of pictures now? Ancient history, as far as I'm concerned. Who cares about Butterflies flooding the shout box (which doesn't take much, btw)? Ancient history.

Sometimes it's better to simply stop and realise that you are electrons on a screen, nothing more.

I'm very happy to stop this. But if Rage starts going on about it again then I probably will respond.


This reminds me back in the days how I couldn't shut up until the other person shut up because I always wanted my last word. My teacher used to tell me "Do you always have to talk last?" because I fight and argue with her if she keep arguing with me and she wanted her last word.  :LOL:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 02:51:12 PM
Thing is *both* of you react like the spazzes you are. Neither wants to simply stop doing this. Who cares about the wall of pictures now? Ancient history, as far as I'm concerned. Who cares about Butterflies flooding the shout box (which doesn't take much, btw)? Ancient history.

Sometimes it's better to simply stop and realise that you are electrons on a screen, nothing more.

I'm very happy to stop this. But if Rage starts going on about it again then I probably will respond.


This reminds me back in the days how I couldn't shut up until the other person shut up because I always wanted my last word. My teacher used to tell me "Do you always have to talk last?" because I fight and argue with her if she keep arguing with me and she wanted her last word.  :LOL:

I've done the same thing myself a lot of times.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 13, 2010, 02:52:06 PM
(http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/4452/putins.jpg)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 02:54:16 PM
(http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/4452/putins.jpg)

Now you're bugging me Soph :moon: :moon: :moon:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Adam on October 13, 2010, 02:55:31 PM
(http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/9410/billclintone.jpg)
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 13, 2010, 03:00:12 PM
Thing is *both* of you react like the spazzes you are. Neither wants to simply stop doing this. Who cares about the wall of pictures now? Ancient history, as far as I'm concerned. Who cares about Butterflies flooding the shout box (which doesn't take much, btw)? Ancient history.

Sometimes it's better to simply stop and realise that you are electrons on a screen, nothing more.

I'm very happy to stop this. But if Rage starts going on about it again then I probably will respond.

Would it harm your ego to simply stop? Would you feel that he got the last word?

The way I see it, if you are convinced that you are right you should be able to stop any time you want. I think you aren't convinced but I also think that this is less about being right and more about pride, having the last word, that sort of thing.

The same goes for Rage, btw.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 13, 2010, 03:00:38 PM
Oh, and Soph: :plus:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: 'Butterflies' on October 13, 2010, 03:03:53 PM
Thing is *both* of you react like the spazzes you are. Neither wants to simply stop doing this. Who cares about the wall of pictures now? Ancient history, as far as I'm concerned. Who cares about Butterflies flooding the shout box (which doesn't take much, btw)? Ancient history.

Sometimes it's better to simply stop and realise that you are electrons on a screen, nothing more.

I'm very happy to stop this. But if Rage starts going on about it again then I probably will respond.

Would it harm your ego to simply stop? Would you feel that he got the last word?

The way I see it, if you are convinced that you are right you should be able to stop any time you want. I think you aren't convinced but I also think that this is less about being right and more about pride, having the last word, that sort of thing.

The same goes for Rage, btw.

I'm not arguing with anybody other than Rage, and so I'm not interested in getting the last word over Soph, or you at all :-\

You're the mod. Why don't you just say something and then lock the thread?
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Natalia Evans on October 13, 2010, 03:04:30 PM
To Rage and Butterflies :asthing:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: odeon on October 13, 2010, 03:12:32 PM
Thing is *both* of you react like the spazzes you are. Neither wants to simply stop doing this. Who cares about the wall of pictures now? Ancient history, as far as I'm concerned. Who cares about Butterflies flooding the shout box (which doesn't take much, btw)? Ancient history.

Sometimes it's better to simply stop and realise that you are electrons on a screen, nothing more.

I'm very happy to stop this. But if Rage starts going on about it again then I probably will respond.

Would it harm your ego to simply stop? Would you feel that he got the last word?

The way I see it, if you are convinced that you are right you should be able to stop any time you want. I think you aren't convinced but I also think that this is less about being right and more about pride, having the last word, that sort of thing.

The same goes for Rage, btw.

I'm not arguing with anybody other than Rage, and so I'm not interested in getting the last word over Soph, or you at all :-\

I was talking about you and Rage. I have no interest in arguing with you.

Quote
You're the mod. Why don't you just say something and then lock the thread?

Because this site is not moderated unless we absolutely have to. The only reason I posted in this thread at all was because I considered the pics you posted juvenile and hoped there was a way to stop the drama.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: DukeNukem on October 13, 2010, 04:50:17 PM

And Butterflies's reasoning was that she didn't want Meadow to get embarrassed by the trouble she is making, not... uh...


 :facepalm2: :facepalm2: :facepalm2:

Butterflies, let me tell you right now: I do NOT need your fucking pity.

Well Mudkipz. After seeing your picture, listening to you talking about your family circumstances, and hearing of your hopeless life with no prospects for the future it's hard not to feel a lot of pity for you.

Your pity is insulting to me. Pities and insults says to me that you don't care. The least you could do is stop pitying me like I am some little stupid and ugly boy. :thumbdn:
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Frolic_Fun on October 13, 2010, 05:03:20 PM
I think you should consider suicide, to be honest. Kill two birds with one stone, solve your life issues and free us from your bullshit!
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 13, 2010, 05:46:12 PM
Or he could follow in Soiledarse's footprints and try plastic surgery. Pills are cheaper, tho'.
Title: Re: WALLPAPER
Post by: Queen Victoria on October 13, 2010, 05:50:11 PM
Listen, folks.  This wallpaper is getting very tattered and dull.  The pattern is repetitious, and just not how I wanted to decorate the Palace.  So, I'm going to lock it.