INTENSITY²
Arena for the Competitive => Main Event Callouts => Topic started by: Al Swearegen on October 04, 2010, 05:56:20 AM
-
So where are those two warriors of morality here with us to force us to bend to their own ideals of morality or sink themselves to hypocritical lows themselves, to extinguish any credibility that their own highly vaunted morality holds?
The Moral Miss Manners Eclair
(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b75/chasedown/AX2006/Image080.jpg)
You are right. Phlexor was wrong. Your wife did not leave you because you may have been an insensitive cunt.
She most likely left you because you talk in fucking mind game playing circles and can't take criticism, or at the very least take on board when someone says you may have made a mistake.
and our own Internet Hard guy Saint Phlexor ("pulling men into line all around the internet")
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2534/3684309013_33fee3523a.jpg)
Yeah, but what kind of cunt has a go at a pregnant woman, you know that it isn't all fun and games being pregnant, unless the reason you aren't married anymore is because you were an oblivious cunt to your ex wife.
They both have a moral platform by their comments and could well be a shining light of exemplary moral decorum and conduct and may be able to gently teach us the right way to be "Intense"
Personally I think this doubtful as they are both fucktards and into self pwn in a big way.
Still let's see what they say.
-
....Shit
-
He's obsessed and butthurt. The only explanation is that he is the sensitive type.
-
He's obsessed and butthurt. The only explanation is that he is the sensitive type.
Nah I think that your bullshit was just clogging up the other thread and as the other thread was to do with Kit and me, it should not really be the place for you and Eclair's retarded bullshit. This is doubly so once the original call out issue has been resolved.
So step up Phlex and back yourself as being NOT a hypocrite morality wise. Can you back you back your claims or can you at least show that you can adequately judge a line of morality without looking like you are a hypocrite?
-
He's obsessed and butthurt. The only explanation is that he is the sensitive type.
Nah I think that your bullshit was just clogging up the other thread and as the other thread was to do with Kit and me, it should not really be the place for you and Eclair's retarded bullshit. This is doubly so once the original call out issue has been resolved.
So step up Phlex and back yourself as being NOT a hypocrite morality wise. Can you back you back your claims or can you at least show that you can adequately judge a line of morality without looking like you are a hypocrite?
I thought that it was OK for anyone to post in the original call-out thread, but the Main Event was just for the two people until the issue was resolved.
"THE MAIN EVENT (members hidden)
After your challenge has been accepted, you get to debate your foe one on one."
-
I don't think they'll enter the ring. :orly:
-
I don't think they'll enter the ring. :orly:
Unless Phlex entered eclair's.......
-
The Moral Miss Manners Eclair
(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b75/chasedown/AX2006/Image080.jpg)
They both have a moral platform by their comments and could well be a shining light of exemplary moral decorum and conduct and may be able to gently teach us the right way to be "Intense"
Personally I think this doubtful as they are both fucktards and into self pwn in a big way.
Still let's see what they say.
None the less Eclair looks smoking hot in that pic. :2thumbsup:
-
:LMAO: I only just saw this thread. Les, you must be getting bored, real bored to even bother.
Sweetness, just because you like picking on pregnant women who have more to deal with in life than your internet :soapbox: and Phlex and I thought better of you...I mean, get over it.
-
:LMAO: I only just saw this thread. Les, you must be getting bored, real bored to even bother.
Sweetness, just because you like picking on pregnant women who have more to deal with in life than your internet :soapbox: and Phlex and I thought better of you...I mean, get over it.
OK, I may take that back;
http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,14891.msg650000.html#msg650000
-
What was wrong with my spam?
-
What was wrong with my spam?
Rage and yourself did it...it sends pages into refresh overload for me....just don't see the point.
-
It's to kill the thread. Duke is doing it too.
-
?
If you want the thread killed, don't post in it.
-
:LMAO: I only just saw this thread. Les, you must be getting bored, real bored to even bother.
Sweetness, just because you like picking on pregnant women who have more to deal with in life than your internet :soapbox: and Phlex and I thought better of you...I mean, get over it.
Whilst there are likely very good reasons for me to have posted this (and certainly Callaway makes some great points) I honestly don't know. Most of what I post here would be classified as "Felt like a good idea at the time". I see I post reactively. An idea comes to me and I post reactively. What I don't do is over-analysing a situation. Post it. get it off mind onto screen, leave it there and hit shown unread posts since your last visit and go to wherever interests you now.
OK Eclair in relation to this. "just because you like picking on pregnant women who have more to deal with in life than your internet"
Show me I "picked on" in terms of more than disagreed and called out Kit.
Show me it is something I do to pregnant women (plural) rather than just a generalisation of one instance with one pregnant woman that you know.
Show me where I "like picking on pregnant women".
I am thinking your arse is talking here rather than your brain but you are able to back yourself in this one instance right?
Furthermore as this is a position of moral high ground here tell me that morally speaking you did not say something like this "You are right. Phlexor was wrong. Your wife did not leave you because you may have been an insensitive cunt.
She most likely left you because you talk in fucking mind game playing circles and can't take criticism, or at the very least take on board when someone says you may have made a mistake."
If you did say this then please tell me why on grounds of morality that you are not a hypocrite and needing to excuse yourself from any debate on the right moral aptitude.
-
^ Sir Les...I love the way you say 'show me this'....'show me that'....
unlike you, my posts and motives are uncalculated....I do them at the whim of how I feel in a moment...
in other words, I feel no need to be strategic, but rather, just myself.
-
^ Sir Les...I love the way you say 'show me this'....'show me that'....
unlike you, my posts and motives are uncalculated....I do them at the whim of how I feel in a moment...
in other words, I feel no need to be strategic, but rather, just myself.
Whilst there are likely very good reasons for me to have posted this (and certainly Callaway makes some great points) I honestly don't know. Most of what I post here would be classified as "Felt like a good idea at the time". I see I post reactively. An idea comes to me and I post reactively. What I don't do is over-analysing a situation. Post it. get it off mind onto screen, leave it there and hit shown unread posts since your last visit and go to wherever interests you now.
Glad to see you paid attention to what I wrote.
Yes I DO get that you don't have any idea of what you say and that your "whims" come at the price of having to think. You don't back what you say and can't "show" (back) much of what you say because you are full of it and talking shit.
It really is all good, but I like seeing you say it in your own words.
-
^ Sir Les...I love the way you say 'show me this'....'show me that'....
unlike you, my posts and motives are uncalculated....I do them at the whim of how I feel in a moment...
in other words, I feel no need to be strategic, but rather, just myself.
Whilst there are likely very good reasons for me to have posted this (and certainly Callaway makes some great points) I honestly don't know. Most of what I post here would be classified as "Felt like a good idea at the time". I see I post reactively. An idea comes to me and I post reactively. What I don't do is over-analysing a situation. Post it. get it off mind onto screen, leave it there and hit shown unread posts since your last visit and go to wherever interests you now.
Glad to see you paid attention to what I wrote.
Yes I DO get that you don't have any idea of what you say and that your "whims" come at the price of having to think. You don't back what you say and can't "show" (back) much of what you say because you are full of it and talking shit.
It really is all good, but I like seeing you say it in your own words.
Sorry, I go with my gut feel on a moment, I'm not too caught up with internet life, Les, my bad.
But what you get is honest input....and non manipulative or for pure enjoyment at anothers expense....
unlike some who play internet people like puppets, just for their pure unadulterated, and sick fun. Call me stupid for my ignorance....I actually like the fact that I don't aspire to 'break' someone online because I have nothing better or more important to do in my real life.
Boring me.
-
^ Sir Les...I love the way you say 'show me this'....'show me that'....
unlike you, my posts and motives are uncalculated....I do them at the whim of how I feel in a moment...
in other words, I feel no need to be strategic, but rather, just myself.
Whilst there are likely very good reasons for me to have posted this (and certainly Callaway makes some great points) I honestly don't know. Most of what I post here would be classified as "Felt like a good idea at the time". I see I post reactively. An idea comes to me and I post reactively. What I don't do is over-analysing a situation. Post it. get it off mind onto screen, leave it there and hit shown unread posts since your last visit and go to wherever interests you now.
Glad to see you paid attention to what I wrote.
Yes I DO get that you don't have any idea of what you say and that your "whims" come at the price of having to think. You don't back what you say and can't "show" (back) much of what you say because you are full of it and talking shit.
It really is all good, but I like seeing you say it in your own words.
Sorry, I go with my gut feel on a moment, I'm not too caught up with internet life, Les, my bad.
But what you get is honest input....and non manipulative or for pure enjoyment at anothers expense....
unlike some who play internet people like puppets, just for their pure unadulterated, and sick fun. Call me stupid for my ignorance....I actually like the fact that I don't aspire to 'break' someone online because I have nothing better or more important to do in my real life.
Boring me.
But I DO call you Stupid and Ignorant already :zoinks:
-
^ Sir Les...I love the way you say 'show me this'....'show me that'....
unlike you, my posts and motives are uncalculated....I do them at the whim of how I feel in a moment...
in other words, I feel no need to be strategic, but rather, just myself.
Whilst there are likely very good reasons for me to have posted this (and certainly Callaway makes some great points) I honestly don't know. Most of what I post here would be classified as "Felt like a good idea at the time". I see I post reactively. An idea comes to me and I post reactively. What I don't do is over-analysing a situation. Post it. get it off mind onto screen, leave it there and hit shown unread posts since your last visit and go to wherever interests you now.
Glad to see you paid attention to what I wrote.
Yes I DO get that you don't have any idea of what you say and that your "whims" come at the price of having to think. You don't back what you say and can't "show" (back) much of what you say because you are full of it and talking shit.
It really is all good, but I like seeing you say it in your own words.
Sorry, I go with my gut feel on a moment, I'm not too caught up with internet life, Les, my bad.
But what you get is honest input....and non manipulative or for pure enjoyment at anothers expense....
unlike some who play internet people like puppets, just for their pure unadulterated, and sick fun. Call me stupid for my ignorance....I actually like the fact that I don't aspire to 'break' someone online because I have nothing better or more important to do in my real life.
Boring me.
But I DO call you Stupid and Ignorant already :zoinks:
Les, let's get it clear right now. You are below me. You know it. Your attempts at belittling me are but an amusement for me....keep going, it reflects your pathetic life.
-
Can I give my own input on this?
Do you honestly think that using your "gut feeling" online will generally work as an attempt to back out of your bullshit? You yourself told me to back up what I said on Trigger's thread, so It's funny to see that you're not doing it either.
I get the impression from you that you think you're above criticism topics like this, that you're too morally high from the rest of us plebs. But think for a minute: How is defending a pregnant woman despite her bullshit online going to solve anything? Would you do the same for pregnant people IRL? Would you ignore the people who don't bullshit but have a genuine struggle in life?
It's obvious the majority here are in contrary of your views (including people who have families and most likely some of the females here who experienced pregnancy themselves), so your self-proclaimed ivory tower of morality seems to be built on insecurity and arrogance. Perhaps I am wrong here, but at least It does really seem your priorities are all over the place.
-
^ Sir Les...I love the way you say 'show me this'....'show me that'....
unlike you, my posts and motives are uncalculated....I do them at the whim of how I feel in a moment...
in other words, I feel no need to be strategic, but rather, just myself.
Whilst there are likely very good reasons for me to have posted this (and certainly Callaway makes some great points) I honestly don't know. Most of what I post here would be classified as "Felt like a good idea at the time". I see I post reactively. An idea comes to me and I post reactively. What I don't do is over-analysing a situation. Post it. get it off mind onto screen, leave it there and hit shown unread posts since your last visit and go to wherever interests you now.
Glad to see you paid attention to what I wrote.
Yes I DO get that you don't have any idea of what you say and that your "whims" come at the price of having to think. You don't back what you say and can't "show" (back) much of what you say because you are full of it and talking shit.
It really is all good, but I like seeing you say it in your own words.
Sorry, I go with my gut feel on a moment, I'm not too caught up with internet life, Les, my bad.
But what you get is honest input....and non manipulative or for pure enjoyment at anothers expense....
unlike some who play internet people like puppets, just for their pure unadulterated, and sick fun. Call me stupid for my ignorance....I actually like the fact that I don't aspire to 'break' someone online because I have nothing better or more important to do in my real life.
Boring me.
But I DO call you Stupid and Ignorant already :zoinks:
Les, let's get it clear right now. You are below me. You know it. Your attempts at belittling me are but an amusement for me....keep going, it reflects your pathetic life.
:lol:. I will but I did not need your permission here to do so.
-
Can I give my own input on this?
Do you honestly think that using your "gut feeling" online will generally work as an attempt to back out of your bullshit? You yourself told me to back up what I said on Trigger's thread, so It's funny to see that you're not doing it either.
I get the impression from you that you think you're above criticism topics like this, that you're too morally high from the rest of us plebs. But think for a minute: How is defending a pregnant woman despite her bullshit online going to solve anything? Would you do the same for pregnant people IRL? Would you ignore the people who don't bullshit but have a genuine struggle in life?
It's obvious the majority here are in contrary of your views (including people who have families and most likely some of the females here who experienced pregnancy themselves), so your self-proclaimed ivory tower of morality seems to be built on insecurity and arrogance. Perhaps I am wrong here, but at least It does really seem your priorities are all over the place.
That is how I read the situation too.
-
Can I give my own input on this?
Do you honestly think that using your "gut feeling" online will generally work as an attempt to back out of your bullshit? You yourself told me to back up what I said on Trigger's thread, so It's funny to see that you're not doing it either.
I get the impression from you that you think you're above criticism topics like this, that you're too morally high from the rest of us plebs. But think for a minute: How is defending a pregnant woman despite her bullshit online going to solve anything? Would you do the same for pregnant people IRL? Would you ignore the people who don't bullshit but have a genuine struggle in life?
It's obvious the majority here are in contrary of your views (including people who have families and most likely some of the females here who experienced pregnancy themselves), so your self-proclaimed ivory tower of morality seems to be built on insecurity and arrogance. Perhaps I am wrong here, but at least It does really seem your priorities are all over the place.
That is how I read the situation too.
Shleed, I can't recall what you said in Triggers thread that I asked you to back up. My bad. Refer to my above comment on how I approach things here.
If I ask someone to back something up, it's usually because they are rabid about others doing it, like Sir Les, and yourself for example.
There are many times I've said how I've felt at a particular time, off the top of my head....sometimes without all the facts, or without considering another opinion. Phlex and I gave our opinion, Les discounted it...and then further went on to try and put both of us down for it.
I can live with that.
-
^ Sir Les...I love the way you say 'show me this'....'show me that'....
unlike you, my posts and motives are uncalculated....I do them at the whim of how I feel in a moment...
in other words, I feel no need to be strategic, but rather, just myself.
Whilst there are likely very good reasons for me to have posted this (and certainly Callaway makes some great points) I honestly don't know. Most of what I post here would be classified as "Felt like a good idea at the time". I see I post reactively. An idea comes to me and I post reactively. What I don't do is over-analysing a situation. Post it. get it off mind onto screen, leave it there and hit shown unread posts since your last visit and go to wherever interests you now.
Glad to see you paid attention to what I wrote.
Yes I DO get that you don't have any idea of what you say and that your "whims" come at the price of having to think. You don't back what you say and can't "show" (back) much of what you say because you are full of it and talking shit.
It really is all good, but I like seeing you say it in your own words.
Sorry, I go with my gut feel on a moment, I'm not too caught up with internet life, Les, my bad.
But what you get is honest input....and non manipulative or for pure enjoyment at anothers expense....
unlike some who play internet people like puppets, just for their pure unadulterated, and sick fun. Call me stupid for my ignorance....I actually like the fact that I don't aspire to 'break' someone online because I have nothing better or more important to do in my real life.
Boring me.
But I DO call you Stupid and Ignorant already :zoinks:
Les, let's get it clear right now. You are below me. You know it. Your attempts at belittling me are but an amusement for me....keep going, it reflects your pathetic life.
Do you realise what you just said? :eyebrows:
I'm sure Les doesn't mind having you on top.
-
Hey Phlex, I just saw this.
Whatever became of this argument? Did we resolve this...looks like it could be a bit of fun rekindling if we have not already sorted it. What do you think?
I will do a bit of reading at the posts in and around here and see if it was sorted out.
Edit: Nope we didn't. I sorted things out with Eclair though.
Damn I have no idea the background really. Something about me being an oblivious cunt and my ex-wife leaving me or me leaving her as being somehow related to me calling out Kit when she was making some silly inferences.
Oh something too about you pulling men in line around the internet.
Pretty silly all around but may be worth regurgitating for more drama. What do you think?
-
I don't think this stupid shit is really worth anything to be honest. I don't have time for bullshit these day, I have better things to do. Surely you also have better things to do.
Resolution is not required for me as this was two years ago. How about I just say you won if that makes you feel better about it?
-
I don't think this stupid shit is really worth anything to be honest. I don't have time for bullshit these day, I have better things to do. Surely you also have better things to do.
Resolution is not required for me as this was two years ago. How about I just say you won if that makes you feel better about it?
The last bullshit drama we had here was Gallstone and that was flash in the pan stuff.
I must admit I had to read up a bit and over a few old threads just to get up to speed with what this bullshit was.
You coming back here just prompted me to think of what you were like last time you were here and the thought that you had made some claims and not really made much of a job in backing them. In fact I think you let Eclair do most of the talking.
Thought it may be worth another bit of nudging to see if you were up for a bit more drama.
Much as I can remember and assess I was apparently pretty low for calling out Kit to explain herself on something she said.
Something she was OK with working through and something that I was not really brutal on her for.
You really seemed to have a bug up your arse about it then, and try as I did, I could not really understand where you were coming from then and now. In fact when mostly when I had questioned you about your reasoning you kind of disagreed with everything in a "No that is not what I mean but whatever" kind of retort. Good way of saying nothing.
After delving into things I was just curious on exactly what your platform, viewpoint, position was or is. Whether it was or is the same. Also I like a bit of a shit-stir occasionally and you rightly pointed that out somewhere in one of the threads.
Was not about winning but thought there may be some fun somewhere to be had.
More than happy to putting it down to you having a high vaulted sense of morality, misreading most of what was going on, trying to pull someone into line and not having the rational or justification to do it, getting on your high horse, finding yourself contradicting yourself, making an ass of yourself in the process and not being able to back yourself once you were in the ridiculous position you were in.
Worse crimes right?
Dredging it up now is of course no worse than starting it then but all good.
-
tl;dr
I don't have time for your drama any more. Keep wasting your time on me if you feel like it, but I honestly think you'd be happier spending you time on something more worthwhile.
I'm not going to agree with you and you aren't going to agree with me, lets just leave it at that and try and be okay with it.
-
tl;dr
I don't have time for your drama any more. Keep wasting your time on me if you feel like it, but I honestly think you'd be happier spending you time on something more worthwhile.
I'm not going to agree with you and you aren't going to agree with me, lets just leave it at that and try and be okay with it.
I am more than happy to leave it, though it had potential to be both interesting and entertaining.
My initial motive was to just see how you would react to a bit of shit-stirring. See if you had changed over the last 2 years. Yes and no.
Same righteousness and ego. Same inability to back themselves adequately.
But reading back over the threads and trying to understand what was happening back then and where this all came from, another motive crept in. Curiousity.
A member called out another member on pretty reasonable grounds. The member called out had previously said that they dislike people not backing themselves or running from an argument. So apparently, from the face of it all good. In fact a reading of the thread in question will show I was not very heavy-handed with Kit.
Yet Phlex comes in so vehemently maligning my marriage with my ex-wife, casting aspersions at my illnesses and accidents, purporting to pull me in line, claiming I am his bitch, claiming I am a low cunt and assorted other invectives.
When pressed on why it is an issue that I called out Kit, he stated that because she was Kit, and that was enough.
When asked whether she ought never be called out or subject to argument, he stated that this was not the case.
When asked if pregnant women ought not be immune from call outs he declined to agree.
When asked if he thought Kit unable to mentally or emotionally handle a call out he disagreed.
In fact he seemed to have a bug up his arse for no reason he could justify or explain.
Curiosity go the better of me. I wanted to believe there was actually something substantial and logical here and that it was more than a fat man having a textual fit over nothing.
-
Are things so boring here now, that I randomly visit the site after a long time and the best entertainment is to re-hash 2 year old arguments with non active users?
Hilarious. Things dull much?
-
Are things so boring here now, that I randomly visit the site after a long time and the best entertainment is to re-hash 2 year old arguments with non active users?
Hilarious. Things dull much?
Eclair! I'm so happy to see you.
-
Are things so boring here now, that I randomly visit the site after a long time and the best entertainment is to re-hash 2 year old arguments with non active users?
Hilarious. Things dull much?
Pretty much. Gallstone, an illiterate wannabee troll with a preoccupation for not so subtlely trying (and failing) to get Dos on the AFF girls, to stalk them, was the last bit of drama.
Phlex coming here could have been potential for a bit more....but alas.
So how are you mate?
-
Are things so boring here now, that I randomly visit the site after a long time and the best entertainment is to re-hash 2 year old arguments with non active users?
Hilarious. Things dull much?
Random. This word does not mean what you think it does.
Glad to see you are well though :)
-
Are things so boring here now, that I randomly visit the site after a long time and the best entertainment is to re-hash 2 year old arguments with non active users?
Hilarious. Things dull much?
I actually choked on my own spit to see there had been a post made by you. :autism:
Really awesome to see you and hope things are going well.
-
Maybe another reply to this thread will result in another "random" visit ;)
Last Active: January 15, 2013, 05:17:01 AM
We see you lurking out there. :santa:
-
Eclair or Phlex?
-
Eclair or Phlex?
I don't think I ever met Phlex
-
Eclair or Phlex?
I don't think I ever met Phlex
Eclair, then? :-\
-
Phlex will be "a round". Silly pun I know.....sigh
-
Eclair or Phlex?
I don't think I ever met Phlex
Eclair, then? :-\
Are things so boring here now, that I randomly visit the site after a long time and the best entertainment is to re-hash 2 year old arguments with non active users?
Hilarious. Things dull much?
Random. This word does not mean what you think it does.
Glad to see you are well though :)
Maybe another reply to this thread will result in another "random" visit ;)
Last Active: January 15, 2013, 05:17:01 AM
We see you lurking out there. :santa:
Yes, Eclair
-
Hey Eclair. I wanna see your bewbs. :mischief:
-
Maybe another reply to this thread will result in another "random" visit ;)
Last Active: January 15, 2013, 05:17:01 AM
We see you lurking out there. :santa:
You don't talk to people like this in real life, do you? After about thirty minutes of your smartassyness, i'd knock your fucking teeth out man.
-
Maybe another reply to this thread will result in another "random" visit ;)
Last Active: January 15, 2013, 05:17:01 AM
We see you lurking out there. :santa:
You don't talk to people like this in real life, do you? After about thirty minutes of your smartassyness, i'd knock your fucking teeth out man.
I highly doubt that, though I do believe that you masturbate furiously while imagining it. ;)
-
Maybe another reply to this thread will result in another "random" visit ;)
Last Active: January 15, 2013, 05:17:01 AM
We see you lurking out there. :santa:
You don't talk to people like this in real life, do you? After about thirty minutes of your smartassyness, i'd knock your fucking teeth out man.
I highly doubt that, though I do believe that you masturbate furiously while imagining it. ;)
Projecting again.
-
I sense a callout. :jerry:
-
Maybe another reply to this thread will result in another "random" visit ;)
Last Active: January 15, 2013, 05:17:01 AM
We see you lurking out there. :santa:
You don't talk to people like this in real life, do you? After about thirty minutes of your smartassyness, i'd knock your fucking teeth out man.
I highly doubt that, though I do believe that you masturbate furiously while imagining it. ;)
Say what you wish there smartass, but Dfg is right. You are constantly projecting your own dissatisfaction onto others. I believe that YOU masturbate furiously while imagining yourself being better than others on a website for spazzes. This most likely occurs right after your wife yanks your ear and hollers at you for being a manchild. :thumbup:
-
:jerry:
-
Indeed. I'm about a hair's breadth from pulling that stupid ass's panties down and showing everyone what a pussy he has.
-
(http://i.qkme.me/3pgryd.jpg)
-
Indeed. I'm about a hair's breadth from pulling that stupid ass's panties down and showing everyone what a pussy he has.
:orly:
-
Hey Eclair. I wanna see your bewbs. :mischief:
They're quite lovely. :eyebrows:
-
Yeah they're not bad.
-
Are things so boring here now, that I randomly visit the site after a long time and the best entertainment is to re-hash 2 year old arguments with non active users?
Hilarious. Things dull much?
What would spice things up if people started posting selfies!