INTENSITY²

Start here => Free For ALL => Topic started by: benjimanbreeg on October 05, 2009, 06:06:37 PM

Title: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 05, 2009, 06:06:37 PM
Soy got an IP ban, and she hasn't been on since  :zoinks: ;)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 05, 2009, 06:12:18 PM


Gus isn't anywhere near capable of spewing the kind of hate he did.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 05, 2009, 06:12:54 PM


Gus isn't anywhere near capable of spewing the kind of hate he did.

one of us is doing a  :asthing:  :police:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 05, 2009, 06:13:55 PM


a cheerleader cop?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: El on October 05, 2009, 06:19:38 PM


a cheerleader cop?
Breaking out the handcuffs and the pompoms, eh?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 05, 2009, 06:21:24 PM
I know, she's not capable of much.  Maybe she was copying and pasting it from some hate website.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 05, 2009, 06:21:52 PM




a cheerleader cop?
Breaking out the handcuffs and the pompoms, eh?


let's see...


*checks calendar*


...nope, that's Thursday. Corn and condoms tonight.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Parts on October 05, 2009, 06:34:12 PM
Let's think I can see IP numbers and I say no
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 05, 2009, 06:37:20 PM




a cheerleader cop?
Breaking out the handcuffs and the pompoms, eh?


let's see...


*checks calendar*


...nope, that's Thursday. Corn and condoms tonight.

 :duh:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 05, 2009, 06:41:35 PM


:autism:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 05, 2009, 06:44:26 PM
I'm glad you are thinking of safety.

I'm not glad I need mind bleach.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 05, 2009, 07:10:25 PM
I'm glad you are thinking of safety.

I'm not glad I need mind bleach.

Hey, you were the one who brought up corn and condoms to begin with. :laugh::
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 05, 2009, 08:21:24 PM
To just say one important thing regarding Soy, all you guys had to do was ignore him by not replying to him, and derail the entire thread in a flood of irrelevant chatter.

Anyway, if Soy was a fake persona of someone else, all I can say is that, successful troll is successful.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 05, 2009, 08:22:47 PM
bint's been around here a lot longer, and to pull something like that off, you'd have to be really manipulative. I mean, to post in bint's style, and then quickly change to Soiledarse's racist anti-human rhetoric. And personally, I don't think she'd bother say anything as nasty as he did to a third party, like Callaway's daughter.

I think benji is just throwing in strawmen to light a fire and get some drama.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 05, 2009, 08:24:14 PM
TCO this is the kinda shit i'm talking about... THIS is why you are more autistic than half the people here :thumbup:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 05, 2009, 09:50:32 PM
I'm glad you are thinking of safety.

I'm not glad I need mind bleach.

Hey, you were the one who brought up corn and condoms to begin with. :laugh::

True, but I don't need the image of a guy inserting that combination into his person.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 05, 2009, 09:53:14 PM
To just say one important thing regarding Soy, all you guys had to do was ignore him by not replying to him, and derail the entire thread in a flood of irrelevant chatter.

I don't know, he was being pretty full on to begin with, if everyone had of ignored him, he would have upped the ante to try and drag people in.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 05, 2009, 10:31:20 PM


I'm glad you are thinking of safety.

I'm not glad I need mind bleach.

Hey, you were the one who brought up corn and condoms to begin with. :laugh::

True, but I don't need the image of a guy inserting that combination into his person.


didn't say it was for me.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 05, 2009, 10:34:52 PM


I'm glad you are thinking of safety.

I'm not glad I need mind bleach.

Hey, you were the one who brought up corn and condoms to begin with. :laugh::

True, but I don't need the image of a guy inserting that combination into his person.


didn't say it was for me.

You didn't not say it was you for either.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Callaway on October 05, 2009, 10:35:47 PM
To just say one important thing regarding Soy, all you guys had to do was ignore him by not replying to him, and derail the entire thread in a flood of irrelevant chatter.

Anyway, if Soy was a fake persona of someone else, all I can say is that, successful troll is successful.

I actually did that for his first few insults, but he was so dumb he thought I did not realize he was trying to insult me.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 05, 2009, 10:49:38 PM
I'm still taking Dr Soph's assessment as a compliment.  :indeed:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 06, 2009, 12:11:35 AM
You spaz, you. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 06, 2009, 12:59:23 AM
Anyway, the issue is over with unless the next one comes along and that's inevitable.

I understand the problem of ignoring someone who's out for a fight and will say anything to excite anger, but realize also that these kind of people thrive on the emotional responses you give them. Getting all "FUCK YOU", "I want to kill you", or wall of text serious on them is practically useless. That's when the art of trolling needs to be learned in order to handle yourself better. The simplest advice is that, if you can't ignore their faggotry, play into it with satire and/or wit. Creativity and patience counts a lot too. The rule is, whoever shows that they're offended first, loses.

I mean for example this in case:

Mention how glorious western culture is, and the fact since it steals from other cultures, you don't have to leave your house or pay for travelling costs to enjoy bits of the world.

Things like that. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 06, 2009, 01:12:32 AM
True, of course. :plus:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 06, 2009, 01:48:45 AM
You spaz, you. :zoinks:

 :asthing: :indeed:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 06, 2009, 04:47:43 AM
To just say one important thing regarding Soy, all you guys had to do was ignore him by not replying to him, and derail the entire thread in a flood of irrelevant chatter.

Anyway, if Soy was a fake persona of someone else, all I can say is that, successful troll is successful.

I actually did that for his first few insults, but he was so dumb he thought I did not realize he was trying to insult me.

He had some good points though
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 06, 2009, 05:11:00 AM
About?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: El on October 06, 2009, 05:35:22 AM


a cheerleader cop?
Breaking out the handcuffs and the pompoms, eh?


let's see...


*checks calendar*


...nope, that's Thursday. Corn and condoms tonight.
Blugh.  Call me when you decide to break out the plastic outfits and sundae toppings.

TCO this is the kinda shit i'm talking about... THIS is why you are more autistic than half the people here :thumbup:
...he's one point to the right of the middle of the bellcurve?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 06, 2009, 07:25:09 AM
I actually did that for his first few insults, but he was so dumb he thought I did not realize he was trying to insult me.

 ::)

Gus left in protest of the banning of Soleiyu.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Callaway on October 06, 2009, 08:14:34 AM
I actually did that for his first few insults, but he was so dumb he thought I did not realize he was trying to insult me.

 ::)

Gus left in protest of the banning of Soleiyu.

That's her choice to make, but he was threatening the site, so he had to go.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 06, 2009, 10:32:31 AM
About?

Callaway, she get all her knowledge from wikpedia apparently.

Don't speak shit-lit.  Gus=Soy, one in the same.  And what, she left in protest?   :laugh:  Thats pretty meaningless as she has nothing of her own to add.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Parts on October 06, 2009, 10:39:35 AM
I never believed him real just too over the top
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Trigger 11 on October 06, 2009, 11:06:03 AM
 :'(
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Callaway on October 06, 2009, 11:49:52 AM
About?

Callaway, she get all her knowledge from wikpedia apparently.

Don't speak shit-lit.  Gus=Soy, one in the same.  And what, she left in protest?   :laugh:  Thats pretty meaningless as she has nothing of her own to add.

I didn't read Soleiyu saying that about me.  I don't get all my knowledge from wikipedia, although it can be a good place to get general ideas about some topics.

I thought what he said about you and Gus becoming a couple was funny, though.  You do seem to be fascinated by her.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Trigger 11 on October 06, 2009, 12:48:49 PM
Best be laying off my girl! >:(
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Alex179 on October 06, 2009, 12:53:22 PM
If Soy and Bint are the same person, it would be hilarious.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Blasted on October 06, 2009, 01:46:37 PM
 ::)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 06, 2009, 02:35:21 PM
lol
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 06, 2009, 04:11:16 PM
About?

Callaway, she get all her knowledge from wikpedia apparently.

Don't speak shit-lit.  Gus=Soy, one in the same.  And what, she left in protest?   :laugh:  Thats pretty meaningless as she has nothing of her own to add.

I didn't read Soleiyu saying that about me.  I don't get all my knowledge from wikipedia, although it can be a good place to get general ideas about some topics.

I thought what he said about you and Gus becoming a couple was funny, though.  You do seem to be fascinated by her.

He must have put it on I2, like you think you're clever, but you're not.

Yeah, there's gotta be more to her than meets the eye, no-one can be that dull.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 06, 2009, 04:11:59 PM
Best be laying off my girl! >:(

Lol, piss off.  I thought you were gay.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 06, 2009, 04:17:55 PM
About?

Callaway, she get all her knowledge from wikpedia apparently.

Don't speak shit-lit.  Gus=Soy, one in the same.  And what, she left in protest?   :laugh:  Thats pretty meaningless as she has nothing of her own to add.

Looks like you don't have anything to add, either. I think I've heard a few variations of this by now but very little new.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 06, 2009, 05:14:07 PM


Mention how glorious western culture is, and the fact since it steals from other cultures, you don't have to leave your house or pay for travelling costs to enjoy bits of the world.


HEY, FUCK YOU


oh, wait...


...dammit.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 06, 2009, 05:17:33 PM


Call me when you decide to break out the plastic outfits and sundae toppings.


I save those for special occasions.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 06, 2009, 05:30:17 PM
I think benji's been at those fucking juniper berries again.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 06, 2009, 05:45:18 PM
About?

Callaway, she get all her knowledge from wikpedia apparently.

Don't speak shit-lit.  Gus=Soy, one in the same.  And what, she left in protest?   :laugh:  Thats pretty meaningless as she has nothing of her own to add.

Looks like you don't have anything to add, either. I think I've heard a few variations of this by now but very little new.

I don't know much about Callaway.  Too be honest, I really don't care that much.  The fact that i'm showing interest in all this nonsense is a sign that I gotta cut down going on my computer, and this site.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 06, 2009, 05:55:33 PM
Well, at least benji changed his avvie. Disco dancing skellingtons tend to lose their charm after the 3rd dance.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 06, 2009, 05:58:54 PM
Cause people knew how to stop it moving, so might as well have a still picture
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 06, 2009, 06:01:45 PM
Cause people knew how to stop it moving, so might as well have a still picture

They do? Damnit. Why do I always miss the coles notes?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: jman on October 06, 2009, 06:02:27 PM
I actually did that for his first few insults, but he was so dumb he thought I did not realize he was trying to insult me.

 ::)

Gus left in protest of the banning of Soleiyu.

no big loss  :violin:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 06, 2009, 06:06:34 PM
Cause people knew how to stop it moving, so might as well have a still picture

They do? Damnit. Why do I always miss the coles notes?

Odeon knows how
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Callaway on October 06, 2009, 06:44:29 PM
Cause people knew how to stop it moving, so might as well have a still picture

They do? Damnit. Why do I always miss the coles notes?

If a picture is moving and you want to freeze it on the page, then you use the Esc button.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Blasted on October 06, 2009, 07:01:05 PM
I actually did that for his first few insults, but he was so dumb he thought I did not realize he was trying to insult me.

 ::)

Gus left in protest of the banning of Soleiyu.

Not really Lit.  I'm just getting tired and sick of this place.  Which is ironic enough, since the fact that I'm not tired just brought me back for a bit.  Why is it that only you twats are up at this time?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 06, 2009, 07:04:11 PM
Cause people knew how to stop it moving, so might as well have a still picture

They do? Damnit. Why do I always miss the coles notes?

If a picture is moving and you want to freeze it on the page, then you use the Esc button.

Ahhh! There's my "learned something new today" moment. Thanks.  ;)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 06, 2009, 07:14:17 PM
I actually did that for his first few insults, but he was so dumb he thought I did not realize he was trying to insult me.

 ::)

Gus left in protest of the banning of Soleiyu.

Not really Lit.  I'm just getting tired and sick of this place.  Which is ironic enough, since the fact that I'm not tired just brought me back for a bit.  Why is it that only you twats are up at this time?

love u too  :thumbdn:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Blasted on October 06, 2009, 07:37:40 PM
I'm twatty too though! :laugh:  Hence why I come back even when I don't wanna  :facepalm2:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 06, 2009, 07:39:22 PM
but u do wanna

u do really,deep down

deep deep deep down
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Blasted on October 06, 2009, 07:41:04 PM
Nuh-uh
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 06, 2009, 07:41:26 PM
yuh-uh
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 06, 2009, 07:42:21 PM
I'm horny. Carry on.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 06, 2009, 07:44:28 PM
wrong thread  :sheep:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 06, 2009, 07:45:48 PM


I'm horny. Carry on.


How you  doin'?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Blasted on October 06, 2009, 07:52:11 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 06, 2009, 07:54:45 PM


I'm horny. Carry on.


How you  doin'?

(http://i.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/040330/181752__10janice_l.jpg)

:laugh:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: renaeden on October 06, 2009, 09:12:50 PM
I don't like him cos I think he's a pretentious arsehole. Nothing to do with what anyone else thinks.

And that avvie he's got definitely has Parkinson's. Fuck it's annoying.  :grrr:
Addblock Plus FTW!  :green:
The adblocker?
Yep, you can also use it to block annoying avatars.
You can just disable them without an adblocker.
How is this done? I only know of adblock and the Esc key to stop pictures moving.
FFS I wrote about the Esc key to stop pictures moving. But then again, what should I expect? No one read my post.  ::)
I think I was pretty decent to Soleiyu but did any of you notice? No, you were too busy provoking him into more insults. He only noticed a group of about seven of you. Callaway went along with it and that is why he noticed her. It would have been so easy for anyone to come up with something shocking in regards to that, even I could have done it. It doesn't take much to type it out.

You all fell for it.
 >:(
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Callaway on October 06, 2009, 09:27:29 PM
I don't like him cos I think he's a pretentious arsehole. Nothing to do with what anyone else thinks.

And that avvie he's got definitely has Parkinson's. Fuck it's annoying.  :grrr:
Addblock Plus FTW!  :green:
The adblocker?
Yep, you can also use it to block annoying avatars.
You can just disable them without an adblocker.
How is this done? I only know of adblock and the Esc key to stop pictures moving.
FFS I wrote about the Esc key to stop pictures moving. But then again, what should I expect? No one read my post.  ::)
I think I was pretty decent to Soleiyu but did any of you notice? No, you were too busy provoking him into more insults. He only noticed a group of about seven of you. Callaway went along with it and that is why he noticed her. It would have been so easy for anyone to come up with something shocking in regards to that, even I could have done it. It doesn't take much to type it out.

You all fell for it.
 >:(


I noticed that you were quite decent to Soleiyu, Renaeden.

But he just pretty much ignored that, I think because he was too busy trolling the people he thought he might get a rise from.

I think you might have been the one who told me about the Esc button in the first place.

Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 06, 2009, 09:30:25 PM
Well, the ESC worked for me. I've got Ad-Block, but the thing is too damn hard to work out.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 06, 2009, 09:35:33 PM
I don't like him cos I think he's a pretentious arsehole. Nothing to do with what anyone else thinks.

And that avvie he's got definitely has Parkinson's. Fuck it's annoying.  :grrr:
Addblock Plus FTW!  :green:
The adblocker?
Yep, you can also use it to block annoying avatars.
You can just disable them without an adblocker.
How is this done? I only know of adblock and the Esc key to stop pictures moving.
FFS I wrote about the Esc key to stop pictures moving. But then again, what should I expect? No one read my post.  ::)
I think I was pretty decent to Soleiyu but did any of you notice? No, you were too busy provoking him into more insults. He only noticed a group of about seven of you. Callaway went along with it and that is why he noticed her. It would have been so easy for anyone to come up with something shocking in regards to that, even I could have done it. It doesn't take much to type it out.

You all fell for it.
 >:(


I also noticed you were nice to him. He didn't deserve it. I think a few times he was even rude to people who were nice to him.

That guy needs overwhelming evidence that his attitude stinks. He honestly believes everything he says.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 06, 2009, 10:07:23 PM
I do read your posts, along with anyone else in threads I'm interested in, renaeden.

Anyway, let's all drop this shit about Soleiyu and move on.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 06, 2009, 10:09:19 PM
He's gone, and soon will be forgotten.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: renaeden on October 06, 2009, 10:22:02 PM
^ ::)
No he won't. Maybe you, but not some of us.

Callaway, maybe you could post more about yourself instead of about your daughter, then she won't get targeted. That was pretty off of Soleiyu, but I almost expected that to happen.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 06, 2009, 10:45:18 PM
^ ::)
No he won't. Maybe you, but not some of us.

Callaway, maybe you could post more about yourself instead of about your daughter, then she won't get targeted. That was pretty off of Soleiyu, but I almost expected that to happen.

ren: Your posts were read the same as anyone else's. Soleiyu's were getting very difficult to read, let alone understand because of the vile stuff that he put into some of them. It wouldn't have mattered waht anyone had said, if he didn't like that person or their race he targetted them AND their family, whether he knew them or not. Callaway, Phlexor and DD didn't need that shit thrown at them and their families, and it didn't matter that they were nice back.

He doesn't seem to be getting the same audience on zOMG, and some of the topics he is posting in are ones I at least can avoid. Pity he didn't afford this forum the same courtesy.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 01:31:59 AM
About?

Callaway, she get all her knowledge from wikpedia apparently.

Don't speak shit-lit.  Gus=Soy, one in the same.  And what, she left in protest?   :laugh:  Thats pretty meaningless as she has nothing of her own to add.

Looks like you don't have anything to add, either. I think I've heard a few variations of this by now but very little new.

I don't know much about Callaway.  Too be honest, I really don't care that much.  The fact that i'm showing interest in all this nonsense is a sign that I gotta cut down going on my computer, and this site.

Your choice.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 01:33:08 AM
I actually did that for his first few insults, but he was so dumb he thought I did not realize he was trying to insult me.

 ::)

Gus left in protest of the banning of Soleiyu.

Not really Lit.  I'm just getting tired and sick of this place.  Which is ironic enough, since the fact that I'm not tired just brought me back for a bit.  Why is it that only you twats are up at this time?

I hope you stick around.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 01:41:07 AM
I don't like him cos I think he's a pretentious arsehole. Nothing to do with what anyone else thinks.

And that avvie he's got definitely has Parkinson's. Fuck it's annoying.  :grrr:
Addblock Plus FTW!  :green:
The adblocker?
Yep, you can also use it to block annoying avatars.
You can just disable them without an adblocker.
How is this done? I only know of adblock and the Esc key to stop pictures moving.
FFS I wrote about the Esc key to stop pictures moving. But then again, what should I expect? No one read my post.  ::)
I think I was pretty decent to Soleiyu but did any of you notice? No, you were too busy provoking him into more insults. He only noticed a group of about seven of you. Callaway went along with it and that is why he noticed her. It would have been so easy for anyone to come up with something shocking in regards to that, even I could have done it. It doesn't take much to type it out.

You all fell for it.
 >:(


I noticed that you were decent to him.

Quite a few of us did give the guy a second chance after he calmed down and said he'd be nice, but I honestly don't see why we'd have to give him a third chance when he went off the deep end. I for one will not stand by without doing anything when somebody posts the kind of bs he did. Maybe I should but I think enough damage has been done in the world by people who chose to shut up and let things happen.

The fact is that many of us post enough details of ourselves for someone like Soy. Does the existence of trolls like Soy mean that we shouldn't post anything personal about matters important to us, ever?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2009, 02:28:03 AM
Fucking good point, odeon. These fora are for us to be able to talk to ourselves as if we were talking face-to-face, and that means we should be able to pass on whatever information we want to disclose. If a cunt like Soy then comes along and plays funny buggers and then expect sumpathy, then why should he get it? Both pea and ahayes had probably been guilty of similar shit, so why should this clown have been treated any different?

Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 02:55:58 AM
A basic problem is that anything we post about ourselves on teh internets can (and often will) be used against us. The basic rule, therefore, should be that if you don't want someone to use a particular piece of information, don't go public with it. It's not fair and it's not nice, and we should be able to trust our fellow spazzes, and the vast majority of people here would never do such a thing, but it only takes a single idiot to create a mess.

So I can certainly see Renaeden's point. But there's also the fact that she's a nicer human being than most.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 03:06:07 AM
But there's also the fact that she's a nicer human being than most.

The nicest I've ever met :)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 03:37:41 AM
Soleiyu was nicer to me than anyone of you have ever been.

Callaway is a big self-righteous whiner. He never meant anything he said, I know that for sure.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 03:39:37 AM
Soleiyu was nicer to me than anyone of you have ever been.

Is this supposed to be proof of his good nature?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 03:43:10 AM
He's a good person, yes, if you treat him the right way.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 03:44:33 AM
He's a good person, yes, if you treat him the right way.

Sorry...But are you on drugs?

Did you actually read what he said about Callaway's daughter? Callaway or not, no one should wish that upon anyone's child! Sheesh.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 03:47:29 AM
Yes, I read it, and he didn't mean it. Whiner.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 03:48:10 AM
Yes, I read it, and he didn't mean it. Whiner.

Oh, he didn't mean. That's ok then?

Manslaughterers didn't mean it either...
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 03:53:02 AM
 :wanker:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 03:54:52 AM
:wanker:

I agree
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 03:56:23 AM
Why don't you rename this WP2 instead.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 03:57:22 AM
Why don't you rename this WP2 instead.

Maybe you're under the mistaken impression that this is my site?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 04:00:55 AM
 :facepalm2:

And now Callaway is going to response with some lame comment.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 04:02:11 AM
:facepalm2:

And now Callaway is going to response with some lame comment.

No. I doubt that. She might respond though. She won't response.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 04:03:35 AM
 :yawn:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 04:05:40 AM
:)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Callaway on October 07, 2009, 04:09:29 AM
Callaway is a big self-righteous whiner. He never meant anything he said, I know that for sure.

Soy was banned for threatening the site.

I don't see where I have whined about this.  I understand that Soy is your friend and that you brought him here so you feel you need to defend him, but still I wonder how you would feel if he had started a thread saying that your mother should have hooks in her vagina attached to nylon ropes and then be dropped off a high bridge?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 04:10:20 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 04:16:13 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 04:21:38 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

No, that's because I'm not a whiner.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 04:23:19 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

No, that's because I'm not a whiner.

And yet...oddly enough, you seem to be whining now though...
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 04:26:39 AM
 :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn: :yawn:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 07, 2009, 04:27:29 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

I actually agree with Lit here though; because regardless even if his remarks were serious, you cannot let yourself get too seriously agitated by them. Composure is key.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 04:40:25 AM
He's a good person, yes, if you treat him the right way.

He got treated the way he treats others.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 04:42:33 AM
Yes, I read it, and he didn't mean it. Whiner.

So what should we have done, in your opinion? Give him a hug and thank him for attacking someone who's got nothing to do with this?

Oh, and how, exactly, do you know that he didn't mean it?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 04:46:02 AM
He told me that he just wanted to provoke because he hated the mentality of false tolerance on the board.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 04:50:52 AM
"false tolerance"?

I fail to see how his post was to provoke anything positive...
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 04:53:43 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 04:55:07 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That makes no sense to me. Explain it clearer.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: renaeden on October 07, 2009, 04:56:34 AM
Callaway is a big self-righteous whiner. He never meant anything he said, I know that for sure.
Soy was banned for threatening the site.

I don't see where I have whined about this.  I understand that Soy is your friend and that you brought him here so you feel you need to defend him, but still I wonder how you would feel if he had started a thread saying that your mother should have hooks in her vagina attached to nylon ropes and then be dropped off a high bridge?
I would feel nothing. I know my mum and love her to bits and his words are just letters on a computer screen. If he said it about my stepmother, though, I would tell him that I would pay to see it. :P

He wanted to get to you, Callaway, and he couldn't find anything on here to get to you about except for your daughter. Because that is what you mostly post about. I know more about your daughter than I do about you.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Callaway on October 07, 2009, 04:57:09 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That's not even a post on this board.  That's on Dunc's Drivel.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 04:58:20 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That's not even a post on this board.  That's on Dunc's Drivel.

 :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing:

Ever heard the word "travesty"?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 05:02:38 AM
He told me that he just wanted to provoke because he hated the mentality of false tolerance on the board.

But what the fuck did he expect? That we'd sit back and silently listen to his crap without reacting in some way?

His choice.

This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

He says half the board are subhumans and whatnot, attacks Dawg's and Callaway's daughters for no apparent reason, and you say it's all a tasteless joke? FFS, you cannot possibly be that naive, Lit.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 05:03:14 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That's not even a post on this board.  That's on Dunc's Drivel.

 :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing:

Ever heard the word "travesty"?

MAKE SENSE DAMMIT!
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 05:04:56 AM
He was just provoking. He was banned at least three times from the Swedish board where I found him, because he posted similar things there. They banned him for trolling, though, because they thought he couldn't be for real.

You should have responded in the same way.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 05:05:29 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

I actually agree with Lit here though; because regardless even if his remarks were serious, you cannot let yourself get too seriously agitated by them. Composure is key.

Not everyone reactes in the same way. And above all, you probably react differently when your family is involved. I know I do.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 05:05:40 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That's not even a post on this board.  That's on Dunc's Drivel.

 :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing:

Ever heard the word "travesty"?

MAKE SENSE DAMMIT!

 ::)

That thread is a travesty on I2 mentality.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 05:09:11 AM
He was just provoking. He was banned at least three times from the Swedish board where I find him, because he posted similar things there. They banned him for trolling, though, because they thought he couldn't be for real.

You should have responded in the same way.

By banning him for trolling?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 05:10:48 AM
I sometimes wonder why people come to this site.

Don't take that the wrong way, I don't mean to disparage the site or indeed any one. I just wonder what people are seeking; what they get from the site. I like coming here mainly because there are people I like here, and I do like the 'callout' idea, free speech and all that.
But what do others get?

What did Soyleieueuieueieueiueie or whatever his name was, expect to get from this site? The site, of whose members he referred to as subhuman, or elitist, or what have you... What did he expect to gain? What do you, any of you who care to answer, expect to gain from coming to the site?

I expect free exchange of ideas, meaningless banter between friends and enemies, and the expectation that if I say something stupid, and I have, I will be called on it.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 05:11:51 AM
He was just provoking. He was banned at least three times from the Swedish board where I find him, because he posted similar things there. They banned him for trolling, though, because they thought he couldn't be for real.

You should have responded in the same way.

By banning him for trolling?

No, responded with the same kind of insults he made to you, I mean.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Callaway on October 07, 2009, 05:12:16 AM

He wanted to get to you, Callaway, and he couldn't find anything on here to get to you about except for your daughter.

If that's the case, I guess he wanted to get to DirtDawg too even though he has not posted on the board for quite some time.

Soy said that I put him on ignore and he saw that as some sort of victory, but I never did.

I used the ignore function soon after it was installed, but I haven't used it since.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 05:12:46 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That's not even a post on this board.  That's on Dunc's Drivel.

 :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing:

Ever heard the word "travesty"?

MAKE SENSE DAMMIT!

 ::)

That thread is a travesty on I2 mentality.

You're still not making sense... The best I can understand is that you feel people bottle their inner intolerances in favour of...being PC? And that Soylieu was trying to provoke some sort of intolerant response?

Well he succeeded I suppose. Odeon, and thus the site, would not tolerate his shit anymore. Bye bye Soy.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 05:14:53 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That's not even a post on this board.  That's on Dunc's Drivel.

 :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing:

Ever heard the word "travesty"?

MAKE SENSE DAMMIT!

 ::)

That thread is a travesty on I2 mentality.

You're still not making sense... The best I can understand is that you feel people bottle their inner intolerances in favour of...being PC? And that Soylieu was trying to provoke some sort of intolerant response?

Well he succeeded I suppose. Odeon, and thus the site, would not tolerate his shit anymore. Bye bye Soy.

NO, he meant that the "tolerance" on this site was hypocrisy; you defend towelheads for the sake of political correctness and at the same time stab a fellow aspie in the back.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2009, 05:19:15 AM
Islam is gay
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 05:23:10 AM
This is an example of what the false tolerance on this board looks like: is this Allah?? is this how he would look? (http://www.duncsdrivel.biz/index.php?topic=354.0)

The response to the first post in that thread would undoubtedly be the one in the third post.

That's false tolerance, especially since you at the same time treat a fellow aspie like shit because he made some really tasteless jokes.

That's not even a post on this board.  That's on Dunc's Drivel.

 :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing: :asthing:

Ever heard the word "travesty"?

MAKE SENSE DAMMIT!

 ::)

That thread is a travesty on I2 mentality.

You're still not making sense... The best I can understand is that you feel people bottle their inner intolerances in favour of...being PC? And that Soylieu was trying to provoke some sort of intolerant response?

Well he succeeded I suppose. Odeon, and thus the site, would not tolerate his shit anymore. Bye bye Soy.

NO, he meant that the "tolerance" on this site was hypocrisy; you defend towelheads for the sake of political correctness and at the same time stab a fellow aspie in the back.

Bullshit. Sharing the same dx doesn't grant you special powers. If you behave like an arse, you'll be treatded like an arse, regardless of dx. This fellow aspie brother bullshit is a poor excuse for being an arse, IMO.

I defend "towelheads" not because of being politically correct, I defend them because I believe they have the same rights as the rest of us. I defend them because you're attacking them on no other grounds than fear and intolerance--no *fake* intolerance there either, Lit, but a real-life bigotry.

Soy behaves like an arse, he gets called on his behaviour. End of story.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 05:26:57 AM
Islam is gay

So are most religions.

NO, he meant that the "tolerance" on this site was hypocrisy; you defend towelheads for the sake of political correctness and at the same time stab a fellow aspie in the back.

I defend people's rights to an ideology. But I will attack a person for flawed beliefs if given the chance...and motivation. His being aspie and their being muslim is irrelevant to me.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 05:29:33 AM
Islam is gay

Right. Thank you for that interesting contribution to the discussion.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 05:33:11 AM
Bullshit. Sharing the same dx doesn't grant you special powers. If you behave like an arse, you'll be treatded like an arse, regardless of dx. This fellow aspie brother bullshit is a poor excuse for being an arse, IMO.

I defend "towelheads" not because of being politically correct, I defend them because I believe they have the same rights as the rest of us. I defend them because you're attacking them on no other grounds than fear and intolerance--no *fake* intolerance there either, Lit, but a real-life bigotry.

Soy behaves like an arse, he gets called on his behaviour. End of story.

Islam doesn't belong here. Do or do not immigrants harass ethnical Swedes for the mere fact that they are ethnical Swedes, in our own country? Do or do they not show that they don't respect Swedish laws and the Swedish way of life?

They should be thankful - and nothing else - that they are tolerated in Sweden and othern Western countries at all.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 05:34:47 AM
Islam is gay

So are most religions.

NO, he meant that the "tolerance" on this site was hypocrisy; you defend towelheads for the sake of political correctness and at the same time stab a fellow aspie in the back.

I defend people's rights to an ideology. But I will attack a person for flawed beliefs if given the chance...and motivation. His being aspie and their being muslim is irrelevant to me.

Yes, because Islam isn't a flawed ideology at all; a moon god religion, written down on order of an illiterate pedophile more than 600 years ago.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 05:37:05 AM
Bullshit. Sharing the same dx doesn't grant you special powers. If you behave like an arse, you'll be treatded like an arse, regardless of dx. This fellow aspie brother bullshit is a poor excuse for being an arse, IMO.

I defend "towelheads" not because of being politically correct, I defend them because I believe they have the same rights as the rest of us. I defend them because you're attacking them on no other grounds than fear and intolerance--no *fake* intolerance there either, Lit, but a real-life bigotry.

Soy behaves like an arse, he gets called on his behaviour. End of story.

Islam doesn't belong here. Do or do not immigrants harass ethnical Swedes for the mere fact that they are ethnical Swedes, in our own country? Do or do they not show that they don't respect Swedish laws and the Swedish way of life?

They should be thankful - and nothing else - that they are tolerated in Sweden and othern Western countries at all.

Do not hold the majority accountable for the acts of a few. I don't think all Autistics are bigoted arseholes because a few of them are. You should do the same for islamic people.

Islam is gay

So are most religions.

NO, he meant that the "tolerance" on this site was hypocrisy; you defend towelheads for the sake of political correctness and at the same time stab a fellow aspie in the back.

I defend people's rights to an ideology. But I will attack a person for flawed beliefs if given the chance...and motivation. His being aspie and their being muslim is irrelevant to me.

Yes, because Islam isn't a flawed ideology at all; a moon god religion, written down on order of an illiterate pedophile more than 600 years ago.

I said nothing of their ideology. Like I said if I were approached by a muslim person I would easily question their views as I did to Soy. But I still uphold people's rights to have their views, no matter how stupid. Soy was entitled to his opinions, but he should think twice before airing them...Think as to the consequences of airing such opinions.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 05:46:25 AM
Bullshit. Sharing the same dx doesn't grant you special powers. If you behave like an arse, you'll be treatded like an arse, regardless of dx. This fellow aspie brother bullshit is a poor excuse for being an arse, IMO.

I defend "towelheads" not because of being politically correct, I defend them because I believe they have the same rights as the rest of us. I defend them because you're attacking them on no other grounds than fear and intolerance--no *fake* intolerance there either, Lit, but a real-life bigotry.

Soy behaves like an arse, he gets called on his behaviour. End of story.

Islam doesn't belong here. Do or do not immigrants harass ethnical Swedes for the mere fact that they are ethnical Swedes, in our own country? Do or do they not show that they don't respect Swedish laws and the Swedish way of life?

The vast majority of them respect our laws, just as the vast majority of ethnic Swedes respect our laws. We are free to choose whatever religion we want here.

There are plenty of ethnic Swedes (such as yourself) harassing Muslims for the mere fact that they are Muslims. What makes you better than those few among Muslims that harass ethnic Swedes?

Quote
They should be thankful - and nothing else - that they are tolerated in Sweden and othern Western countries at all.

You should be thankful for living in a country where views such as yours can be aired.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Trigger 11 on October 07, 2009, 05:56:22 AM
1) I am not gay, but if I was would still back my friends. Okay, that came out the wrong way. Shit, that didn't help! :facepalm2: :facepalm: :duh:

2) I have most of you on ignore. As in, I don't bother reading the majority of posts by certain members. I am completely out of the loop...again. I am blissfully unaware.

3) I do not have a vagina. Can't remember why I seem to need to state that. This thread has given me a headache.

4) Some of you need to grow up and realize your shenannigans are only tolerated out of respect for you to have your own beliefs, but you are nothing but giant hypocrits with your intolerance.

5) Shut the fuck up, yo!

6) A good woman does 70 things, cook and....

7) 69!

8) Aww fuck it, I forget what eight was for! :headbang2:

9) Sounds like the idiot said some pretty vulgar and disrespectful things.

10) Everything! Everything! Everything! Everything! :headbang2:

11) Maybe the vagina was in reference to the twats comment. Yeah, that was definitely it!!!

Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on October 07, 2009, 06:02:38 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

I actually agree with Lit here though; because regardless even if his remarks were serious, you cannot let yourself get too seriously agitated by them. Composure is key.

Not everyone reactes in the same way. And above all, you probably react differently when your family is involved. I know I do.

Fair point, but I'd still maintain composure on how I reply because I would prefer to avoid escalation.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 06:07:16 AM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: renaeden on October 07, 2009, 06:10:34 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.
That's because you are a fuckhead.
I actually agree with Lit here though; because regardless even if his remarks were serious, you cannot let yourself get too seriously agitated by them. Composure is key.
Not everyone reactes in the same way. And above all, you probably react differently when your family is involved. I know I do.
Fair point, but I'd still maintain composure on how I reply because I would prefer to avoid escalation.
This is what I try to do. I think that as soon as insults are made, then the discussion/argument is no longer effective. With Soleiyu, nothing would change his mind on some things so what was the point in arguing with him on it?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 06:13:19 AM
Not everyone reactes in the same way. And above all, you probably react differently when your family is involved. I know I do.

This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

I don't have kids and I found Soy's post abhorrent. Though I didn't respond at the time because..well he's not worth my time and effort. And in the end he got banned, which may not be what he deserved, but it is a justice of sorts.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 07, 2009, 06:17:55 AM
still gay
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: renaeden on October 07, 2009, 06:18:23 AM
But there's also the fact that she's a nicer human being than most.
The nicest I've ever met :)
Thanks.  :) I forgot to respond to this earlier.

I am pretty nasty sometimes as well. Like what I wrote about my stepmother, who is the most evil person I have ever met. And sometimes I just don't feel like being nice.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 06:18:48 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

I actually agree with Lit here though; because regardless even if his remarks were serious, you cannot let yourself get too seriously agitated by them. Composure is key.

Not everyone reactes in the same way. And above all, you probably react differently when your family is involved. I know I do.

Fair point, but I'd still maintain composure on how I reply because I would prefer to avoid escalation.

I don't suffer fools gladly. Depending on what the other person said or did, I might not want to avoid escalation. Involve my kids, for example, and I will do my best to uttrerly destroy the fool.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 06:19:45 AM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 06:19:50 AM
Not everyone reactes in the same way. And above all, you probably react differently when your family is involved. I know I do.

This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

I don't have kids and I found Soy's post abhorrent. Though I didn't respond at the time because..well he's not worth my time and effort. And in the end he got banned, which may not be what he deserved, but it is a justice of sorts.

Again, he got banned because he threatened the site, not because he behaved like an arse.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 07, 2009, 06:20:15 AM
He was just provoking. He was banned at least three times from the Swedish board where I find him, because he posted similar things there. They banned him for trolling, though, because they thought he couldn't be for real.

You should have responded in the same way.

By banning him for trolling?

No, responded with the same kind of insults he made to you, I mean.

then the board becomes like a bunch of 4 year olds with better typing skills and more colourful vocabulary, but lacking in substance. There's tasteless jokes, and then there's dude, have a little decency.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 06:21:26 AM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 06:21:50 AM
I would take it for what it was, a tasteless joke.

That's because you are a fuckhead.

I actually agree with Lit here though; because regardless even if his remarks were serious, you cannot let yourself get too seriously agitated by them. Composure is key.

Not everyone reactes in the same way. And above all, you probably react differently when your family is involved. I know I do.

Fair point, but I'd still maintain composure on how I reply because I would prefer to avoid escalation.

I don't suffer fools gladly. Depending on what the other person said or did, I might not want to avoid escalation. Involve my kids, for example, and I will do my best to uttrerly destroy the fool.


And well within your right...But what if, as a hypothetical, their criticisms were called for? (which Soy's was certainly not)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 06:23:04 AM
He was just provoking. He was banned at least three times from the Swedish board where I find him, because he posted similar things there. They banned him for trolling, though, because they thought he couldn't be for real.

You should have responded in the same way.

By banning him for trolling?

No, responded with the same kind of insults he made to you, I mean.

then the board becomes like a bunch of 4 year olds with better typing skills and more colourful vocabulary, but lacking in substance. There's tasteless jokes, and then there's dude, have a little decency.

He had some very good points about Anglo-centrsim an PC hypocrisy, though, but no one listened to that either.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Trigger 11 on October 07, 2009, 06:24:08 AM
Seems like soylent green wins by causing all of the controversy. It's like Limbaugh or Beck. They make outrageous statements just to provoke. My suggestion would be to move on.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 06:24:48 AM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Whether he meant it or not, it's the fact that he dared to even post something as horrible as that. When you have kids it changes you, you become very protective of your kids and other peoples kids.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 06:26:02 AM
But what if, as a hypothetical, their criticisms were called for? (which Soy's was certainly not)

I hope I'd listen. If you don't start by calling me a subhuman or attacking my kids, it's conceivable that I would listen.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 07, 2009, 06:27:44 AM
He was just provoking. He was banned at least three times from the Swedish board where I find him, because he posted similar things there. They banned him for trolling, though, because they thought he couldn't be for real.

You should have responded in the same way.

By banning him for trolling?

No, responded with the same kind of insults he made to you, I mean.

then the board becomes like a bunch of 4 year olds with better typing skills and more colourful vocabulary, but lacking in substance. There's tasteless jokes, and then there's dude, have a little decency.

He had some very good points about Anglo-centrsim an PC hypocrisy, though, but no one listened to that either.

That's because if your verbal attacks, hatred and vile outweigh your substance and well thought out responses, people are not going to remember you for your substance. If you want to get people riled up, fine. But don't make that your main MO because then people won't take you seriously when you do have something worthy to contribute. It's all about balance.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 06:28:13 AM
He was just provoking. He was banned at least three times from the Swedish board where I find him, because he posted similar things there. They banned him for trolling, though, because they thought he couldn't be for real.

You should have responded in the same way.

By banning him for trolling?

No, responded with the same kind of insults he made to you, I mean.

then the board becomes like a bunch of 4 year olds with better typing skills and more colourful vocabulary, but lacking in substance. There's tasteless jokes, and then there's dude, have a little decency.

He had some very good points about Anglo-centrsim an PC hypocrisy, though, but no one listened to that either.

He had a lot of things he said was good, but because he was such an asshole, thinking he was better than everyone else and not afraid to put people down left right and centre, no one gave a crap.

His problem was that he was very rigid and had already made his mind up about what he believed in, not leaving any room for debate. And the idea and ideals he was fixated on were disgusting to say the least.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 06:29:47 AM
He had some very good points about Anglo-centrsim an PC hypocrisy, though, but no one listened to that either.

As I hinted in my previous post, it doesn't help your cause if you start by calling people subhumans before making your points. Why should anyone listen or try to respect the opinions of someone who won't extend that same courtesy to you?

Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 06:30:24 AM
He was just provoking. He was banned at least three times from the Swedish board where I find him, because he posted similar things there. They banned him for trolling, though, because they thought he couldn't be for real.

You should have responded in the same way.

By banning him for trolling?

No, responded with the same kind of insults he made to you, I mean.

then the board becomes like a bunch of 4 year olds with better typing skills and more colourful vocabulary, but lacking in substance. There's tasteless jokes, and then there's dude, have a little decency.

He had some very good points about Anglo-centrsim an PC hypocrisy, though, but no one listened to that either.

He had a lot of things he said was good, but because he was such an asshole, thinking he was better than everyone else and not afraid to put people down left right and centre, no one gave a crap.

His problem was that he was very rigid and had already made his mind up about what he believed in, not leaving any room for debate. And the idea and ideals he was fixated on were disgusting to say the least.

If I recall...I was once a little like that... And by once I mean currently.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: renaeden on October 07, 2009, 06:31:32 AM
 I was curious about Soleyu minus all the insults. He described autism in ways I had not seen before. hyke noticed that as well.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 06:32:35 AM
I was curious about Soleyu minus all the insults. He described autism in ways I had not seen before. hyke noticed that as well.

Yes I have to admit that that was intriguing.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Trigger 11 on October 07, 2009, 08:16:11 AM
Once again the message is lost in the bullshit! When will they learn?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2009, 11:08:02 AM
Lit, you're a fucking idiot. Trying to defend the indefensible. Soy deserved what he got because his attitude stunk, and he went on the attack to virtually anyone who challenged his bullshit notions. I don't have kids either, but see any attack on peopel who can't stick up for themselves as abhorrant and disgusting. And big fucking deal if he'd been flicked from all those Swedish boards.... Doesn't that tell YOU that he was out of step with EVERTOBE he spoke to? He is an anathema because while he might have a message to put accross to people, the fundamental thing that stops this message getting through is the pig-ignorance and mind-blindness (thanks earthboundmisfit for that) that is blocking his brain from seeing reality. You see him as a friend, worthy of respect; to us, it's just a waste of time because he never allowed us to see inside all the shit that surrounded him.

And I noticed how you decided to use the shoutbox on zOMG to have a go at this site and call us all wankers. Fucking who then is the hypocrite?  :indeed:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 11:14:06 AM
 :violin:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 12:02:55 PM
Guess your plan to bring Sol here backfired on you Lit.

Now everyone is starting to call you out on your racist bullshit.

 :laugh:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Christopher McCandless on October 07, 2009, 12:21:01 PM
I don't like him cos I think he's a pretentious arsehole. Nothing to do with what anyone else thinks.

And that avvie he's got definitely has Parkinson's. Fuck it's annoying.  :grrr:
Addblock Plus FTW!  :green:
The adblocker?
Yep, you can also use it to block annoying avatars.
You can just disable them without an adblocker.
How is this done? I only know of adblock and the Esc key to stop pictures moving.
FFS I wrote about the Esc key to stop pictures moving. But then again, what should I expect? No one read my post.  ::)
I think I was pretty decent to Soleiyu but did any of you notice? No, you were too busy provoking him into more insults. He only noticed a group of about seven of you. Callaway went along with it and that is why he noticed her. It would have been so easy for anyone to come up with something shocking in regards to that, even I could have done it. It doesn't take much to type it out.

You all fell for it.
 >:(


Sorryy, but its really not our problem if he is not a good sport. This is not Wrong Planet.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2009, 12:24:39 PM
Yep, looking for a soapbox on zOMG. Only thing is, Lit's the only bugger that will listen. I don't think benji and buttcoffee really give a shit about him, tbh.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Christopher McCandless on October 07, 2009, 12:33:22 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 12:37:16 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.

Not to that extent, and even so, they are kids and he is an adult. He knew what he was doing.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Christopher McCandless on October 07, 2009, 12:45:44 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.

Not to that extent, and even so, they are kids and he is an adult. He knew what he was doing.
Some of us are more affected than others, the problem we all share is other peoples expecations. I feel he should have the freedom to be an Aspie on here.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 01:17:19 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.

Not to that extent, and even so, they are kids and he is an adult. He knew what he was doing.
Some of us are more affected than others, the problem we all share is other peoples expecations. I feel he should have the freedom to be an Aspie on here.

For most of it, yes, but saying those terrible things about members children really stepped over the line.

He was saying those things to be really hurtful and get a reaction out of people.

Please point out how that's him being aspie and not just a run of the mill disgusting asshole.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Christopher McCandless on October 07, 2009, 01:37:28 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.

Not to that extent, and even so, they are kids and he is an adult. He knew what he was doing.
Some of us are more affected than others, the problem we all share is other peoples expecations. I feel he should have the freedom to be an Aspie on here.

For most of it, yes, but saying those terrible things about members children really stepped over the line.

He was saying those things to be really hurtful and get a reaction out of people.

Please point out how that's him being aspie and not just a run of the mill disgusting asshole.
I think he has been cooped up for way too long and is very bitter and angry about as a result. If you look at when he hit out like that, for the most part there was an obvious cause at some point. I also think that he was beginning to calm down.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 02:57:23 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.

Nothing to do with that. This guy claimed to have some kind of intelligence, yet he did this with both Dawg's and Callaway's daughters, repeatedly, over a longer period of time, in spite of the immediate reaction he provoked. It had NOTHING to do with doing something out of anger because he lacked social skills (which he did, but that's a different story) and everything to do with his being a complete arse.

Don't try to excuse his being an arse with a dx we all share.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 02:58:26 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.

Not to that extent, and even so, they are kids and he is an adult. He knew what he was doing.
Some of us are more affected than others, the problem we all share is other peoples expecations. I feel he should have the freedom to be an Aspie on here.

He did have that, just as everybody else here. What he doesn't have is a carte blanche to being an arse without a reaction.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 03:01:26 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.

Not to that extent, and even so, they are kids and he is an adult. He knew what he was doing.
Some of us are more affected than others, the problem we all share is other peoples expecations. I feel he should have the freedom to be an Aspie on here.

For most of it, yes, but saying those terrible things about members children really stepped over the line.

He was saying those things to be really hurtful and get a reaction out of people.

Please point out how that's him being aspie and not just a run of the mill disgusting asshole.
I think he has been cooped up for way too long and is very bitter and angry about as a result. If you look at when he hit out like that, for the most part there was an obvious cause at some point. I also think that he was beginning to calm down.

He started by airing a lot of shit, provoking a lot of people. Then he said he'd play nice and people calmed down and pretty much everybody said that he'd get a second chance. Then he went off the deep end again, attacking Dawg's daughter and calling people for subhumans because they happened to live in a country he disliked, and peoplecalled him on it.

Obvious, yes. ::)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 03:32:16 PM
This seems it's between those of us who have kids and those of us who do not.

If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!

Attack my kids and that's the reaction you'll get. If you don't mean it, then don't do it in the first place!
The thing is none of us are here for our social and diplomatic skills. I am sure your kids occasionally say outrageous things in anger, lots of people on the spectrum do.

Not to that extent, and even so, they are kids and he is an adult. He knew what he was doing.
Some of us are more affected than others, the problem we all share is other peoples expecations. I feel he should have the freedom to be an Aspie on here.

 :agreed:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 07, 2009, 05:25:42 PM
People can be their aspie selves all they want. But just because you're an aspie doesn't mean that you have permission to lack decency. He's smart enough to know why he did what he did so I don't think anyone should dumb him down. Being an aspie isn't an excuse to be an asshole.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2009, 05:32:11 PM
Jesus Hadron, grow up and pull your head out of your arse. You can be a real fuckstick when it comes to talking nonsense sometimes.

And Lit, how about actually giving up an opinion of your own?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 07, 2009, 06:08:28 PM


With Soleiyu, nothing would change his mind on some things so what was the point in arguing with him on it?


It wasn't about trying to change his mind. It was about him not acknowledging or respecting anyone else's views on anything.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 07, 2009, 06:10:39 PM


If I had kids and anyone tried to do anything like that to them, they'd be thankful if the cops caught them before I did, but he didn't mean any of it!


Then why fucking say it? Do you think it makes someone smart or clever when they say things just to instigate? My nephew can do that, and he's four.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 06:10:59 PM
Jesus Hadron, grow up and pull your head out of your arse. You can be a real fuckstick when it comes to talking nonsense sometimes.

And Lit, how about actually giving up an opinion of your own?

 :agreed:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 06:14:48 PM
Then why fucking say it? Do you think it makes someone smart or clever when they say things just to instigate? My nephew can do that, and he's four.

I don't see why people get upset when it's so obvious that he doesn't mean it. That's even more immature than his provocations.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 06:26:03 PM
Then why fucking say it? Do you think it makes someone smart or clever when they say things just to instigate? My nephew can do that, and he's four.

I don't see why people get upset when it's so obvious that he doesn't mean it. That's even more immature than his provocations.

People aren't upset because they think he meant it, they are upset that he even said it at all.

Grow a brain.

 ::)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: TheoK on October 07, 2009, 06:29:52 PM
If someone gets upset over something that they know isn't meant for real, then it's even more immature.

Being upset over mere words instead of actual deeds is an NT behaviour btw.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2009, 07:08:24 PM
And the next person who mentions this 'that's NT behaviour' shite is serious gonna get a cyber-reaming. Sheesh, insecure much.

You are totally missing the point, Lit; and have been through the whole exchange. Soy says one bucket of shit about something, we call him on what he says, and you piss and moan that he is being picked on for not understanding what he was saying. What we understood was that he shouldn't have said that shit in the first place. If he'd carried on a normaL conversation without antagonizing people we'd be on some sort of level ground. But he went on the attack from the moment he came here. Calling all Americans, Brits, Jews Aussies etc subhuman trash, and picking on sand-niggers etc isn't going to endear you to the greater community. All people are going to do then is tell you to fuck off, and it doesn't matter that you've got anything decent to say after that. And a half-heated apology and promise to do better was just that - he tried to manipulate us into thinking he was OK, then he started in with the same shit. Telling us he didn't mean it is bullshit, Lit, because nobody makes a joke out of something for that long unless they are seriously fucked.

We've accepted you as part of the 'family', but don't try to fuck things up by sticking up for someone who doesn't deserve it.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 08:13:33 PM
Autism is not an excuse for bad behaviour.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: renaeden on October 07, 2009, 09:55:05 PM
We've accepted you as part of the 'family',
Who are "we"?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Phlexor on October 07, 2009, 09:56:56 PM
If someone gets upset over something that they know isn't meant for real, then it's even more immature.

Being upset over mere words instead of actual deeds is an NT behaviour btw.

Maybe you should just shut up until you know what you are talking about.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 07, 2009, 10:26:51 PM
ren: I2, of course.  :green:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 07, 2009, 11:37:59 PM
If someone gets upset over something that they know isn't meant for real, then it's even more immature.

Being upset over mere words instead of actual deeds is an NT behaviour btw.

Who gives a fuck what kind of behaviour you label it as? It's a natural reaction, regardless of dx, especially when your kids are involved. And considering the past here, enough things have been said, stuff that shouldn't ever have to be for real, that turned out to be all too real.

Or to put it just a tad differently: why should we care if the guy's immature? Why should we give him break after break when he's barely housebroken and can spew out practically anything. I don't suffer fools gladly and sometimes I'm here to make sure that they know it.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 07, 2009, 11:44:59 PM
Being upset over mere words instead of actual deeds is an NT behaviour btw.

Communication between humans is mostly words. At least complex, in depth communication, and especially so on the internet. Words are not meaningless. You need to be careful what and how you say something lest it be misinterpreted.

Also, on the internet actual deeds are words. There is little that you can do on the internet that is not words. So Solyeu's act, his deed, was the write something deeply offensive. This was the actual deed everyone got up in arms about. Not his intent. Not his meaning. But the act of post something deeply offensive. It doesn't matter that he didn't mean it, or he only intended to provoke some sort of other response. Words have meaning the one's he chose to post have an offensive meaning, even to someone such as myself; I don't count Callaway as a friend, but I like her, and I wouldn't know her daughter from anyone else, but Solyeu's post was offensive even to me.

This was his act. He chose, with full faculties, to make this post, knowing full well what it meant. You and he should not be surprised as to everyone's reaction.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 08, 2009, 02:38:05 PM
We've accepted you as part of the 'family',
Who are "we"?

I know, makes me cringe
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 08, 2009, 03:24:58 PM
We've accepted you as part of the 'family',
Who are "we"?

A new cult. Odeon's god. Guess you missed the memo. ;)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Adam on October 08, 2009, 03:58:47 PM
i don't like the whole We thing. it turns it into an Us versus Them thing. and who is allowed into the We?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 08, 2009, 04:01:58 PM
Thats how TCO likes it on here, he want to be a part of something  :violin:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 08, 2009, 05:14:43 PM
 :crowd: :crowd: :crowd: :grouphug: :crowd: :crowd: :crowd:
 :crowd: :crowd: :crowd: :crowd: :crowd: :crowd: :crowd: :crowd:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 08, 2009, 05:18:21 PM
 :zoinks: :lol:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: renaeden on October 08, 2009, 06:01:31 PM
We've accepted you as part of the 'family',
Who are "we"?
I know, makes me cringe
Me too.
i don't like the whole We thing. it turns it into an Us versus Them thing. and who is allowed into the We?
I don't want to be part of the "we".
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: benjimanbreeg on October 08, 2009, 06:13:38 PM
But for some people, its their dream  :eyelash:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Parts on October 08, 2009, 07:38:28 PM
Soy food tastes gross
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 08, 2009, 07:39:46 PM
And I ain't going near Soy milk.  :lol:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 08, 2009, 07:41:10 PM
Blech Blech Blech *shudder*
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 08, 2009, 07:42:08 PM


Well, I'm sure Gus consumes soy, being as she is vegetarian.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Parts on October 08, 2009, 07:42:52 PM
My son loves soy milk I find it revolting
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 08, 2009, 07:44:19 PM
I know she agreed with him now and then, but I didn't think she was that hard up.  :indeed:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 08, 2009, 07:45:51 PM


Well, I'm sure Gus consumes soy, being as she is vegetarian.

Am I seriously the only one who took the original comment to the gutter? No way. I don't believe it. :P
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Parts on October 08, 2009, 07:47:16 PM


Well, I'm sure Gus consumes soy, being as she is vegetarian.

Am I seriously the only one who took the original comment to the gutter? No way. I don't believe it. :P

 :asthing: :asthing: :asthing:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 08, 2009, 08:19:44 PM
And I ain't going near Soy milk.  :lol:
Well, I'm sure Gus consumes soy, being as she is vegetarian.
Am I seriously the only one who took the original comment to the gutter? No way. I don't believe it. :P

Unfortunately, no. *reaches for the brain bleach*
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 08, 2009, 08:24:21 PM
And I ain't going near Soy milk.  :lol:
Well, I'm sure Gus consumes soy, being as she is vegetarian.
Am I seriously the only one who took the original comment to the gutter? No way. I don't believe it. :P

Unfortunately, no. *reaches for the brain bleach*

Thank you. Strangely enough, I feel redeemed. :P
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 08, 2009, 08:28:51 PM
I tried it years ago, funnily enough. The only time I could stmach it was when it was flavoured. Even then it was revolting.

Give me full cream, Rev or proper flavoured milk any day.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 08, 2009, 08:30:07 PM


And I ain't going near Soy milk.  :lol:
Well, I'm sure Gus consumes soy, being as she is vegetarian.
Am I seriously the only one who took the original comment to the gutter? No way. I don't believe it. :P

Unfortunately, no. *reaches for the brain bleach*


i don't get it...
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: GalileoAce on October 08, 2009, 08:31:32 PM
Milk...From Soy. As in Soyleuieieieuieueueieueieua

That is I should say "milk"
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 08, 2009, 08:33:29 PM
doodle-juice.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 08, 2009, 08:35:22 PM


Oh. I didn't mean to say that she consumed that.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 08, 2009, 08:36:32 PM
his skin flute sprung a leak, my friend :P
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 08, 2009, 08:37:54 PM


Oh. I didn't mean to say that she consumed that.

:lol:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: The_Chosen_One on October 08, 2009, 08:39:00 PM
Now he's just playing A flat.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: odeon on October 09, 2009, 12:29:06 AM
We've accepted you as part of the 'family',
Who are "we"?

A new cult. Odeon's god. Guess you missed the memo. ;)

I missed it, too. :o

Any new obligations I need to know of?
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Blasted on October 18, 2009, 04:52:24 PM
Soy milk is the best.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 18, 2009, 09:37:23 PM


I'd like to try it, but I can't seem to find any soy cows.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 18, 2009, 09:47:18 PM
that's because people look for soy cows in the pasture. But it's a myth. Soy cows live in the forest. Photographic proof below:

Look carefully:
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a260/Canuk1975/NBandQCJune2009329.jpg)

Now look a little more closely:
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a260/Canuk1975/NBandQCJune2009330.jpg)

:laugh:

I was driving in the countryside in New Brunswick (road trip I took in June) and I swore I saw a cow in the forest so I pulled over, grabbed my camera, and went searching. Lo and behold, SOY COWS!!!! :green:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 18, 2009, 09:49:19 PM


mmmmmmmm... unprocessed cheeseburgers
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Celticgoddess on October 18, 2009, 10:14:36 PM


mmmmmmmm... unprocessed cheeseburgers

:lol:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Jack on August 30, 2014, 07:37:33 PM
We've accepted you as part of the 'family',
Who are "we"?
I know, makes me cringe
Me too.
i don't like the whole We thing. it turns it into an Us versus Them thing. and who is allowed into the We?
I don't want to be part of the "we".
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Jack on August 30, 2014, 10:15:16 PM
No, just liked it.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Pyraxis on August 30, 2014, 10:42:42 PM
Renaeden and Jack are Them.
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Jack on August 30, 2014, 10:58:56 PM
:laugh:
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 31, 2014, 11:40:09 AM
2+3 is five. Five...

There are five fingers on my hands. I use my hands to jack off sometimes. Jacking off.. jacking.. Jackhammering is used in construction, or RECONSTRUCTION. Reconstruction of the twin towers is still not finished, even after all these years. There were two towers, and multiplying two by two is four. FOUR. FOUR LETTERS. B-I-N-T.

Oh my god. Bint did 9-11. :o
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: earthboundmisfit on October 05, 2014, 02:25:45 PM


2+3 is five. Five...

There are five fingers on my hands. I use my hands to jack off sometimes. Jacking off.. jacking.. Jackhammering is used in construction, or RECONSTRUCTION. Reconstruction of the twin towers is still not finished, even after all these years. There were two towers, and multiplying two by two is four. FOUR. FOUR LETTERS. B-I-N-T.

Oh my god. Bint did 9-11. :o


(http://www.democratic-republicans.us/images/jeff_goldblum_as-david-levenson-independence-day.jpg)
Title: Re: Soy was Bint
Post by: Arya Quinn on October 12, 2014, 07:33:46 AM
2+3 is five. Five...

There are five fingers on my hands. I use my hands to jack off sometimes. Jacking off.. jacking.. Jackhammering is used in construction, or RECONSTRUCTION. Reconstruction of the twin towers is still not finished, even after all these years. There were two towers, and multiplying two by two is four. FOUR. FOUR LETTERS. B-I-N-T.

Oh my god. Bint did 9-11. :o

(http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5qb0niPO61qamvu1.gif)