INTENSITY²

Start here => Free For ALL => Topic started by: Dayko on June 24, 2009, 03:58:31 PM

Title: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Dayko on June 24, 2009, 03:58:31 PM
i found this in msn, just is rare

http://health.msn.com/health-topics/autism/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100240706

Standard IQ Test May Undervalue People With Autism


I think that is has right  in fact  in an test that they did in 1990  scored me as limited iq and well i think is wrong that value given.

what do you think  about that report on MSN?

Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 24, 2009, 04:55:56 PM


I've always done very well on those types of tests... consistently at or above 95%.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Callaway on June 24, 2009, 06:48:43 PM
I have always done quite well on IQ tests too, but I know that my daughter is smarter than her IQ test score would indicate.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 24, 2009, 07:05:34 PM
I've never done a real IQ test, just internet ones.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 24, 2009, 07:25:50 PM
Pointing out the obvious really, most of us are left to languish in an educational system built around the needs of NT's.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: P7PSP on June 24, 2009, 07:25:57 PM
I don't think I've had one since 10th grade.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 24, 2009, 07:30:47 PM
Kill the NT, so that he,
And not you on the ground shall lie
So not from your home will there be heard a cry
But the cry of his death
He wanted as much - by his own resolve
Let not your mother weep herself insane
But let his instead mourn for him
Let not yours but his wife
Wait for his return in vain.

If an NT, your brother has killed,
If an NT, your neighbor has killed, -
Then your brother and neighbor have avenged,
But for you there shall be no excuse.
One should not hide behind another's back,
Another's weapon will not do your deed,
Thus kill the NT yourself
Thus kill him as fast as you can,
How many ever times he appears,
That many times you should kill.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Parts on June 24, 2009, 07:39:54 PM
I've never done a real IQ test, just internet ones.
 

Me neither the two kids I have who have have done well though..  What they are saying makes sense though
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 24, 2009, 10:40:59 PM
Kill the NT, so that he,
And not you on the ground shall lie
So not from your home will there be heard a cry
But the cry of his death
He wanted as much - by his own resolve
Let not your mother weep herself insane
But let his instead mourn for him
Let not yours but his wife
Wait for his return in vain.

If an NT, your brother has killed,
If an NT, your neighbor has killed, -
Then your brother and neighbor have avenged,
But for you there shall be no excuse.
One should not hide behind another's back,
Another's weapon will not do your deed,
Thus kill the NT yourself
Thus kill him as fast as you can,
How many ever times he appears,
That many times you should kill.

 :agreed:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 24, 2009, 10:42:38 PM
This confirms what I have suspected for a long time, btw. I guess that if they calculated with the fact that I'm an Aspie my IQ would be like 170-180 or so.  8)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 25, 2009, 05:42:09 AM
This confirms what I have suspected for a long time, btw. I guess that if they calculated with the fact that I'm an Aspie my IQ would be like 170-180 or so.  8)
And that score would be about as useful to you as having a 12-inch dick would be to a guy living a life of celibacy, i.e. the ability to say  "I have something that sounds impressive, but which I don't use at all!"
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 05:45:13 AM
Kill the NT, so that he,
And not you on the ground shall lie
So not from your home will there be heard a cry
But the cry of his death
He wanted as much - by his own resolve
Let not your mother weep herself insane
But let his instead mourn for him
Let not yours but his wife
Wait for his return in vain.

If an NT, your brother has killed,
If an NT, your neighbor has killed, -
Then your brother and neighbor have avenged,
But for you there shall be no excuse.
One should not hide behind another's back,
Another's weapon will not do your deed,
Thus kill the NT yourself
Thus kill him as fast as you can,
How many ever times he appears,
That many times you should kill.

:aff:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 25, 2009, 05:47:26 AM
This confirms what I have suspected for a long time, btw. I guess that if they calculated with the fact that I'm an Aspie my IQ would be like 170-180 or so.  8)
And that score would be about as useful to you as having a 12-inch dick would be to a guy living a life of celibacy, i.e. the ability to say  "I have something that sounds impressive, but which I don't use at all!"

But I use it. I post incredibly intelligent things on this board and I use my language skills to chat in English and German. :toporly:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 25, 2009, 05:54:39 AM
This confirms what I have suspected for a long time, btw. I guess that if they calculated with the fact that I'm an Aspie my IQ would be like 170-180 or so.  8)
And that score would be about as useful to you as having a 12-inch dick would be to a guy living a life of celibacy, i.e. the ability to say  "I have something that sounds impressive, but which I don't use at all!"

 8)
Fixed.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 25, 2009, 05:57:18 AM
I even ordered Obsession shower gel from London a couple of weeks ago.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Callaway on June 25, 2009, 10:10:29 AM
I even ordered Obsession shower gel from London a couple of weeks ago.  :zoinks:

 :laugh:

I don't believe that requires a 170 IQ to accomplish.

Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: ALLDAYGLOWRANDY on June 25, 2009, 02:05:26 PM
I have always done quite well on IQ tests too, but I know that my daughter is smarter than her IQ test score would indicate.


Kiss kiss,  they don't know what they are doing,  basically, with regards to that test.
From what I remember, from an out of date book, it said that its a good predicator of achdemic performance.
I aren't sure, but they can make a reasonable guess.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 02:10:55 PM
I agree Flo.  IQ tests can be faulty in determining whether someone is intelligent or not, as can be seen here *coughLitcough*  :laugh:

Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: ALLDAYGLOWRANDY on June 25, 2009, 02:20:37 PM
My IQ is above average, a bit, according to that test, however, I wish to point out that emotions can get in the way of a test like that, especially if they are significant to manifest themselves as a disorder or a syndrome.   For example, chronically elevated coritsol can impact memory.  I had an undiagnosed complex post traumatic stress disorder, with various stimuli.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 02:23:13 PM
That's true.  For example my meds are messing up my attention span and making me forget my sentence in the middle of me saying it.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: ALLDAYGLOWRANDY on June 25, 2009, 02:26:36 PM
People who have alot of money get more exporser to certain things that raises iq to.
I herd people fight about that kind of thing around me,  I do have some acess to certain things though.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 25, 2009, 02:28:43 PM
I herd people

 :sheep:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 25, 2009, 02:30:46 PM
People who have alot of money get more exporser to certain things that raises iq to.
I herd people fight about that kind of thing around me,  I do have some acess to certain things though.

Quote
I herd people fight about that kind of thing around me,  I do have some acess to certain things though.

Quote
I do have some acess to certain things though.

Like soaf's dick. With your fucking mouth.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 25, 2009, 02:33:34 PM
I want access to your ass, Randy  :indeed:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 02:42:01 PM
Meanies the lot of ya.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: ALLDAYGLOWRANDY on June 25, 2009, 02:44:55 PM
Meanies the lot of ya.

Kiss your butt :-* :-*
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 25, 2009, 02:46:03 PM
Meanies the lot of ya.

Kiss your butt :-* :-*

Why thank you Flo  ;)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: ALLDAYGLOWRANDY on June 25, 2009, 02:46:53 PM


Meanies the lot of ya.

Kiss your butt :-* :-*

Why thank you Flo  ;)

Unless your a bi male, "female".

Thanks again, whichever you are.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Dayko on June 25, 2009, 02:53:24 PM
i just think that the test that i had get performed in 1990 is bullshit.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 25, 2009, 03:11:08 PM
Meanies the lot of ya.

Kiss your butt :-* :-*

Oooh! oooh! Do me next!  :cheer:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Peter on June 25, 2009, 05:12:23 PM
Here's what I got when I was tested in 2005:

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 1 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 2 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 3 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 4 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 5 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 6 c.jpg)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 25, 2009, 10:46:45 PM
My verbal IQ is about 185 or so, at least if the test is in Swedish, despite my misspellings here sometimes.

My spatial IQ is just about 100.

My EQ is 67.  :-\
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: P7PSP on June 25, 2009, 10:52:34 PM
Here's what I got when I was tested in 2005:

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 1 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 2 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 3 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 4 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 5 c.jpg)

(http://www.petermack.dreamhosters.com/sharefiles/personal/psych/IQ test page 6 c.jpg)
With all that shit redacted are you sure that is not somone else's test results?
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Peter on June 26, 2009, 02:21:12 AM
With all that shit redacted are you sure that is not somone else's test results?

I'm quite sure.  You'll have to take my word on it, though.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: P7PSP on June 26, 2009, 02:23:52 AM
Okay Peter that's good enough for me.  ;D
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Peter on June 26, 2009, 03:10:21 AM
My verbal IQ is about 185 or so, at least if the test is in Swedish, despite my misspellings here sometimes.

My spatial IQ is just about 100.

My EQ is 67.  :-\

What age were you when you were tested?  The test that I took uses an age-correction scheme; the maximum attainable score starts off at about 200 for young children, and scores are penalised for each year of age until 21, according to a scoring table, at which point the maximum score is somewhere around 160, IIRC.  I was 21 when I was tested, so I got the full age penalty.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 26, 2009, 03:16:05 AM
My verbal IQ is about 185 or so, at least if the test is in Swedish, despite my misspellings here sometimes.

My spatial IQ is just about 100.

My EQ is 67.  :-\

What age were you when you were tested?  The test that I took uses an age-correction scheme; the maximum attainable score starts off at about 200 for young children, and scores are penalised for each year of age until 21, according to a scoring table, at which point the maximum score is somewhere around 160, IIRC.  I was 21 when I was tested, so I got the full age penalty.

I was 24 the first time, but I don't think the Swedish tests are exactly of the sane type.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Peter on June 26, 2009, 06:35:14 AM
My verbal IQ is about 185 or so, at least if the test is in Swedish, despite my misspellings here sometimes.

My spatial IQ is just about 100.

My EQ is 67.  :-\

What age were you when you were tested?  The test that I took uses an age-correction scheme; the maximum attainable score starts off at about 200 for young children, and scores are penalised for each year of age until 21, according to a scoring table, at which point the maximum score is somewhere around 160, IIRC.  I was 21 when I was tested, so I got the full age penalty.

I was 24 the first time, but I don't think the Swedish tests are exactly of the sane type.

Was this when you took a sledgehammer to your car and got sent to a mental hospital?
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 26, 2009, 06:47:40 AM
My verbal IQ is about 185 or so, at least if the test is in Swedish, despite my misspellings here sometimes.

My spatial IQ is just about 100.

My EQ is 67.  :-\

What age were you when you were tested?  The test that I took uses an age-correction scheme; the maximum attainable score starts off at about 200 for young children, and scores are penalised for each year of age until 21, according to a scoring table, at which point the maximum score is somewhere around 160, IIRC.  I was 21 when I was tested, so I got the full age penalty.

I was 24 the first time, but I don't think the Swedish tests are exactly of the sane type.

Was this when you took a sledgehammer to your car and got sent to a mental hospital?

No, it was before that.

By the way, mark the Freudian slip; I wrote sane.  :laugh:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Peter on June 26, 2009, 07:54:31 AM
Sometimes it bothers me that my intelligence is so lop-sided.  If I could trade some of my verbal points for extra working memory, processing speed and perceptual abilities, I think I'd be a lot better off.  As it is, I'm articulate, but I feel quite badly hampered by my deficits, especially since the things I'm interested in don't tend to call on verbal comprehension as much as on things like working memory, arithmetic and digit span.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Callaway on June 26, 2009, 08:18:24 AM
Sometimes it bothers me that my intelligence is so lop-sided.  If I could trade some of my verbal points for extra working memory, processing speed and perceptual abilities, I think I'd be a lot better off.  As it is, I'm articulate, but I feel quite badly hampered by my deficits, especially since the things I'm interested in don't tend to call on verbal comprehension as much as on things like working memory, arithmetic and digit span.

I think that the lop-sidedness in the subtest scores is part of having AS, though.  I remember my daughter's processing speed subtest score was in the mentally retarded range while on some subtests she scored extremely well, particularly one of the math ones where processing speed was not an issue.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 26, 2009, 08:01:48 PM
I know my IQ got tested ages ago, but I don't know what it actually was.  My mom remembers some score, but I don't know what test it was, and if that was the FS score, verbal, or performance.  I also don't know if the score she remembers has anything to do with reality anyway.  She definitely wants to think I'm a genius, so she "remembers" a ridiculously high score; I kinda doubt it's right.  I know I'm smart,* but I also know my mom's memory is lousy.



*and ever-so-humble, of course
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 26, 2009, 08:04:08 PM
Cruel, sexy AND a genius  :-*
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: odeon on June 27, 2009, 08:35:30 AM
This confirms what I have suspected for a long time, btw. I guess that if they calculated with the fact that I'm an Aspie my IQ would be like 170-180 or so.  8)

/shrugs

It's just a number, Lit. Mine would be around 200, but I think it's safe to say that my IQ is not that high.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 27, 2009, 09:37:49 AM
Cruel, sexy AND a genius  :-*
Lol.

Well, as far as scores on IQ-like tests that I *do* know for sure, I didn't hit the ninety-fifth percentile (or anywhere near, actually) when I took the GRE or MAT tests, so I'm prolly not a genius (I think you're supposed to score that high to be considered a 'genius,' or at least to be good enough for MENSA).  Then again, they're both tests people take to get into grad schools, so that prolly fucks the bellcurve... as does how much people study... so even though those tests almost seem 'comparable' and are similar in many regards to IQ tests, they don't really tell me anything translateable.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 27, 2009, 09:40:23 AM


Mensa is 98th percentile.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 09:45:07 AM


Mensa is 98th percentile.

I have passed their introduction test.  8)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 27, 2009, 09:52:59 AM




Mensa is 98th percentile.

I have passed their introduction test.  8)


I have it sitting on my desk. Been apprehensive to take it... what if I'm not that smart?
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 27, 2009, 09:53:46 AM
I'm a geni arse  :moon:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 09:57:04 AM
I have a geni arse :toporly:

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 27, 2009, 09:58:38 AM


Mensa is 98th percentile.
Oh, shit, then I'm nowhere near genuis, then.   :laugh:

When I was 13 I had a sort of mentor from MENSA for two or three weeks.  It was a really old guy.  It was awkward.  I don't think either of us could figure out anything useful for him to do.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 09:59:58 AM
You have a mangy arse.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 27, 2009, 10:01:35 AM
You've seen PMSElle's arse?  :o
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 27, 2009, 10:02:01 AM


You have a mangy arse.


 :plus:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 27, 2009, 10:03:36 AM
Cruel, sexy AND a genius  :-*
Lol.

Well, as far as scores on IQ-like tests that I *do* know for sure, I didn't hit the ninety-fifth percentile (or anywhere near, actually) when I took the GRE or MAT tests, so I'm prolly not a genius (I think you're supposed to score that high to be considered a 'genius,' or at least to be good enough for MENSA).  Then again, they're both tests people take to get into grad schools, so that prolly fucks the bellcurve... as does how much people study... so even though those tests almost seem 'comparable' and are similar in many regards to IQ tests, they don't really tell me anything translateable.
I went on their web site and checked- you need a score on the 95th percentile for the MAT to qualify, which must've been where I got the number from.  I was nowhere near that.

/resigns herself to a life of mediocrity due to non-genius status
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 27, 2009, 10:04:05 AM
You've seen PMSElle's arse?  :o
I'm pretty sure he hasn't.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 27, 2009, 10:04:59 AM
Can I? :kitten:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 10:05:52 AM
Show us yer arse, wench! Or yer ass! :arrr:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 27, 2009, 10:06:58 AM
Show us yer tits too!  :shamone:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 27, 2009, 10:08:49 AM
Can I? :kitten:
Nope, sorry.

Here's someone else's nice-looking ass instead:

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Donkey_1_arp_750px.jpg)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 10:09:57 AM
 :lol:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 27, 2009, 11:59:48 AM
:lol:
Hey, I think it's pretty nice-looking anyway.  I think it might be kinda fun to ride.  I'd just have to make sure there were no safety concerns first.  Don't want to ride an ass like that one and realize midway through you're actually too big and causing damage.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 27, 2009, 12:01:15 PM
Let the ass ride you instead :indeed:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 12:04:05 PM
:lol:
Hey, I think it's pretty nice-looking anyway.  I think it might be kinda fun to ride.  I'd just have to make sure there were no safety concerns first.  Don't want to ride an ass like that one and realize midway through you're actually too big and causing damage.

You'll have to lick and lube it thoroughly first.  8)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 27, 2009, 12:26:31 PM


Let the ass ride you instead :indeed:


In Soviet Russia, ass rides you!
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: earthboundmisfit on June 27, 2009, 12:30:04 PM


I went on their web site and checked- you need a score on the 95th percentile for the MAT to qualify, which must've been where I got the number from.  I was nowhere near that.

/resigns herself to a life of mediocrity due to non-genius status


Where did you find that on their site? The only number I can find on there is 98%. Hmmm... I'll have to see if I can dig up some of my old tests... maybe I can qualify based on them.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 01:41:29 PM
:lol:
Hey, I think it's pretty nice-looking anyway.  I think it might be kinda fun to ride.  I'd just have to make sure there were no safety concerns first.  Don't want to ride an ass like that one and realize midway through you're actually too big and causing damage.

You'll have to lick and lube it thoroughly first.  8)

Very experienced with having your arse fucked aren't ya?  :zoinks:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 27, 2009, 01:56:43 PM
I don't care about proving myself for the likes of Mensa, I'm better off without it. I usually score above average in most IQ tests but I don't really consider myself "intelligent".
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 01:58:04 PM
Meh, bring the subject back to intelligence why don't you?  We were just getting started on anal  :laugh:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 27, 2009, 01:58:56 PM
Let's have sex, PMSElle :moon:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 01:59:35 PM
 :thumbup:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 27, 2009, 02:00:14 PM
Meh, bring the subject back to intelligence why don't you?  We were just getting started on anal  :laugh:

I can't be arsed on reading the entire topic :laugh:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 02:00:40 PM
:lol:
Hey, I think it's pretty nice-looking anyway.  I think it might be kinda fun to ride.  I'd just have to make sure there were no safety concerns first.  Don't want to ride an ass like that one and realize midway through you're actually too big and causing damage.

You'll have to lick and lube it thoroughly first.  8)

Very experienced with having your arse fucked aren't ya?  :zoinks:

Only by girls with a strapon.  8)

Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 02:02:40 PM
:lol:
Hey, I think it's pretty nice-looking anyway.  I think it might be kinda fun to ride.  I'd just have to make sure there were no safety concerns first.  Don't want to ride an ass like that one and realize midway through you're actually too big and causing damage.

You'll have to lick and lube it thoroughly first.  8)

Very experienced with having your arse fucked aren't ya?  :zoinks:

Only by girls with a strapon.  8)



I love strap-ons :toporly:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 02:03:30 PM
That looks like I'm propositioning Lit :aff:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 02:04:44 PM
:lol:
Hey, I think it's pretty nice-looking anyway.  I think it might be kinda fun to ride.  I'd just have to make sure there were no safety concerns first.  Don't want to ride an ass like that one and realize midway through you're actually too big and causing damage.

You'll have to lick and lube it thoroughly first.  8)

Very experienced with having your arse fucked aren't ya?  :zoinks:

Only by girls with a strapon.  8)



I love strap-ons :toporly:

Care for a trip to Sweden? It's lovely here this time of a year.  8)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: P7PSP on June 27, 2009, 02:04:47 PM
I have a geni arse :toporly:


(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h303/usa732/its-a-trap.jpg)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 02:05:53 PM
That looks like I'm propositioning Lit :aff:

But you are. All girls love me secretely.  8)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 02:06:26 PM
That looks like I'm propositioning Lit :aff:

But you are. All girls love me secretely.  8)

Sure.  I come whenever you make a new post  :zoinks:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 27, 2009, 02:07:57 PM
I thought it was my posts that made that happen  ???
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Frolic_Fun on June 27, 2009, 02:08:55 PM
That looks like I'm propositioning Lit :aff:

But you are. All girls love me secretely.  8)

You sure you're talking about humans here, Lit?
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 02:09:03 PM
That looks like I'm propositioning Lit :aff:

But you are. All girls love me secretely.  8)

Sure.  I come whenever you make a new post  :zoinks:

I know.  8)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 02:09:40 PM
I thought it was my posts that made that happen  ???

I'm sorry, Lit has taken your place as my orgasm generator  :(
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 02:10:07 PM
 8)
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Blasted on June 27, 2009, 02:11:17 PM
I do wonder whether Lit realises that I'm being sarcastic....

 :green:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 27, 2009, 02:19:46 PM
No strapon?  ???
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Callaway on June 28, 2009, 02:13:17 PM


I went on their web site and checked- you need a score on the 95th percentile for the MAT to qualify, which must've been where I got the number from.  I was nowhere near that.

/resigns herself to a life of mediocrity due to non-genius status


Where did you find that on their site? The only number I can find on there is 98%. Hmmm... I'll have to see if I can dig up some of my old tests... maybe I can qualify based on them.

http://www.us.mensa.org/Content/AML/NavigationMenu/Join/SubmitTestScores/QualifyingTestScores/QualifyingScores.htm

If you took the SAT after 9/30/74 but before 1/31/94, then a composite score of 1250 would be sufficient.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Pyraxis on June 28, 2009, 02:25:47 PM
 :laugh: After 1994, the SAT can't qualify you for Mensa anymore?

I'm so tempted to make cracks at the USA educational system and standardized testing.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Callaway on June 28, 2009, 02:35:25 PM
:laugh: After 1994, the SAT can't qualify you for Mensa anymore?

I'm so tempted to make cracks at the USA educational system and standardized testing.

No, SATs taken after 1/31/94 do not qualify a person for Mensa membership because the test was changed and no longer correlates with an IQ test, according to Mensa.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 28, 2009, 04:26:48 PM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Callaway on June 28, 2009, 05:13:52 PM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.

All it requires is that your IQ be in the top 2%.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 28, 2009, 05:16:47 PM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.

All it requires is that your IQ be in the top 2%.
On your choice of test though, so in practise its easier than that.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 28, 2009, 05:42:22 PM
I really thought there requirements were stricter.

Who would want to join a group with so many morons?
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Pyraxis on June 28, 2009, 05:43:55 PM
Not me either.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 28, 2009, 05:49:15 PM
I would never join a group full of mormons
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 28, 2009, 05:50:34 PM
I would never join a group full of mormons

Yeah! Fuck those mormons.  :thumbdn:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 28, 2009, 06:05:11 PM
I can remember one mormon I definitely wanted to fuck.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: RageBeoulve on June 28, 2009, 06:14:51 PM
I can remember one mormon I definitely wanted to fuck.

I believe it. The wholesome look is pretty cute on some girls.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 28, 2009, 06:40:59 PM
I can remember one mormon I definitely wanted to fuck.

I believe it. The wholesome look is pretty cute on some girls.

Especially when licking up a massive facial.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: TheoK on June 29, 2009, 01:42:31 AM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.

All it requires is that your IQ be in the top 2%.

"All"? 98% of the Earth's population or >6 billion people will never reach that level.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 29, 2009, 02:14:58 AM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.

All it requires is that your IQ be in the top 2%.

"All"? 98% of the Earth's population or >6 billion people will never reach that level.
Fortunately, anyone with above average intelligence would be able to get in with enough practise.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: odeon on June 29, 2009, 06:07:27 AM
How do you get out, later?
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 29, 2009, 06:38:27 AM
How do you get out, later?
Shoot a few chavs to bring yourself back out of the top 2%
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Callaway on June 29, 2009, 09:05:27 AM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.

All it requires is that your IQ be in the top 2%.

"All"? 98% of the Earth's population or >6 billion people will never reach that level.
Fortunately, anyone with above average intelligence would be able to get in with enough practise.


If by "above average intelligence" you mean a person with an IQ of above 100, then I don't think any amount of practice could change a person with an IQ of 110 into a person with an IQ of 132, which is the Mensa cutoff score on the Stanford Binet or Woodcock-Johnson IQ tests.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Christopher McCandless on June 29, 2009, 09:13:27 AM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.

All it requires is that your IQ be in the top 2%.

"All"? 98% of the Earth's population or >6 billion people will never reach that level.
Fortunately, anyone with above average intelligence would be able to get in with enough practise.


If by "above average intelligence" you mean a person with an IQ of above 100, then I don't think any amount of practice could change a person with an IQ of 110 into a person with an IQ of 132, which is the Mensa cutoff score on the Stanford Binet or Woodcock-Johnson IQ tests.
Anyone with above average IQ could learn all the answers. These things are very cheatable.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Callaway on June 29, 2009, 09:50:03 AM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.

All it requires is that your IQ be in the top 2%.

"All"? 98% of the Earth's population or >6 billion people will never reach that level.
Fortunately, anyone with above average intelligence would be able to get in with enough practise.


If by "above average intelligence" you mean a person with an IQ of above 100, then I don't think any amount of practice could change a person with an IQ of 110 into a person with an IQ of 132, which is the Mensa cutoff score on the Stanford Binet or Woodcock-Johnson IQ tests.
Anyone with above average IQ could learn all the answers. These things are very cheatable.

Well, I have never tried to cheat on an IQ test, but I think that the actual questions on them are closely guarded secrets and they are changed regularly.

What one could do to improve one's score is perhaps take similar tests to learn the testing format, but I don't believe one could memorize all the questions and their answers.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Alex179 on June 29, 2009, 10:48:18 AM
I think insecure people still take IQ tests.   I only took one... and that was in elementary school.   It was good enough to get me into the Gifted program.   I don't need any further valuation of my intelligence.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: ALLDAYGLOWRANDY on June 29, 2009, 01:39:29 PM
I think insecure people still take IQ tests.   I only took one... and that was in elementary school.   It was good enough to get me into the Gifted program.   I don't need any further valuation of my intelligence.

Doesn't that bother given how little we know about them?

It would bother me.  You could be lead falsely, and your growth inhibited.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: P7PSP on June 29, 2009, 02:27:17 PM
I think insecure people still take IQ tests.   I only took one... and that was in elementary school.   It was good enough to get me into the Gifted program.   I don't need any further valuation of my intelligence.

Doesn't that bother given how little we know about them?

It would bother me.  You could be lead falsely, and your growth inhibited.
Give him ginger root and introduce him to your big titted blonde sister and he'll grow.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 29, 2009, 05:18:04 PM
Shit. I always thought Mensa was tough to get into.
Like you were supposed to qualify as a genius or something. :P

1250 is nothing.

All it requires is that your IQ be in the top 2%.

"All"? 98% of the Earth's population or >6 billion people will never reach that level.

So? That 2% still leaves room for a lot of morons.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 29, 2009, 05:20:11 PM


Well, I have never tried to cheat on an IQ test, but I think that the actual questions on them are closely guarded secrets and they are changed regularly.


The only actual IQ test I've taken (though they stopped me part way through, for whatever reason)
had questions that I had seen on CAT tests, in the past. Indeed, I had gotten one of these wrong
before, and still hold that my answer was more correct, although I chose the one desired on the IQ test. :P
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 29, 2009, 05:21:45 PM
I think insecure people still take IQ tests.   I only took one... and that was in elementary school.   It was good enough to get me into the Gifted program.   I don't need any further valuation of my intelligence.

I've always been vaguely curious, but I just don't have the focus to pay
attention on the online ones. I hate thinking on the computer, so I usually
end up crapping out around 140. :P
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: renaeden on June 29, 2009, 07:44:04 PM
I think insecure people still take IQ tests.   I only took one... and that was in elementary school.   It was good enough to get me into the Gifted program.   I don't need any further valuation of my intelligence.
I've always been vaguely curious, but I just don't have the focus to pay
attention on the online ones. I hate thinking on the computer, so I usually
end up crapping out around 140. :P
Better than getting 86.  :duh:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Leto729 on June 29, 2009, 08:12:40 PM
My IQ is 729
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Adam on June 29, 2009, 08:14:57 PM
Well my IQ is 730 so nur  :moon:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Leto729 on June 29, 2009, 08:22:46 PM
I bet. :yawn:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 29, 2009, 10:18:51 PM
I think insecure people still take IQ tests.   I only took one... and that was in elementary school.   It was good enough to get me into the Gifted program.   I don't need any further valuation of my intelligence.
I've always been vaguely curious, but I just don't have the focus to pay
attention on the online ones. I hate thinking on the computer, so I usually
end up crapping out around 140. :P
Better than getting 86.  :duh:

Nah. The tests aim at something I'm a natural at.
Doesn't really indicate shit about a person.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 29, 2009, 10:19:32 PM
My IQ is 729

No. That's tonight's beer count.

And oh boy are you gonna regret it. :D
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 30, 2009, 05:35:08 AM
My IQ is eight billion.  
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: odeon on June 30, 2009, 11:39:33 AM
I left my IQ at home.

No, wait, I am at home. :P
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 30, 2009, 06:53:03 PM
I left my heart in San Fransisco.

No, wait, that was my gheysecks virginity.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 30, 2009, 07:14:02 PM
I found mine there.

Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on June 30, 2009, 07:15:13 PM
I found mine there.


Shit, thought I hid the jar better.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Calandale on June 30, 2009, 07:17:50 PM
I thought it was pickles. :P
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: SleepyDragon on July 01, 2009, 12:21:19 AM
Is this the right place for "It's over 9,000!" references? :zoinks:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: odeon on July 01, 2009, 12:32:46 AM
It is?

I left those at home. :P
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: SleepyDragon on July 01, 2009, 04:59:55 AM
I've got teenaged sons. Priez pour moi.
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Leto729 on July 01, 2009, 05:03:44 AM
My IQ is 729

No. That's tonight's beer count.

And oh boy are you gonna regret it. :D
I could only wish. :lol:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: RageBeoulve on July 01, 2009, 05:18:23 AM
Is this the right place for "It's over 9,000!" references? :zoinks:

WHAT, NINE THOUSAND? :o
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: El on July 01, 2009, 08:46:11 AM
Is this the right place for "It's over 9,000!" references? :zoinks:

WHAT, NINE THOUSAND? :o
In a row???
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: earthboundmisfit on July 01, 2009, 09:26:09 AM


Try not to suck any dicks on your way through the parking lot!
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Alex179 on July 03, 2009, 11:41:44 PM
I think insecure people still take IQ tests.   I only took one... and that was in elementary school.   It was good enough to get me into the Gifted program.   I don't need any further valuation of my intelligence.
I've always been vaguely curious, but I just don't have the focus to pay
attention on the online ones. I hate thinking on the computer, so I usually
end up crapping out around 140. :P
Better than getting 86.  :duh:
IQ tests are not the end-all, be-all.    Don't worry about it.   There are enough people that have high IQs and that have done jack shit with their life, and average people that have done a lot.   
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: renaeden on July 04, 2009, 12:00:37 AM
I think insecure people still take IQ tests.   I only took one... and that was in elementary school.   It was good enough to get me into the Gifted program.   I don't need any further valuation of my intelligence.
I've always been vaguely curious, but I just don't have the focus to pay
attention on the online ones. I hate thinking on the computer, so I usually
end up crapping out around 140. :P
Better than getting 86.  :duh:
IQ tests are not the end-all, be-all.    Don't worry about it.   There are enough people that have high IQs and that have done jack shit with their life, and average people that have done a lot.   
Yeah, I am going to uni. Since I got in, I can't be too bad. :green:
Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: , on August 25, 2009, 12:45:21 PM
i actually have a difficult tme with doing these tests

i eventually figure out things and think they do not consider how we get the answer only that we were able to get it

making pictures from the blocks is hard for me and the only way i am able to do it at all is from just moving them around fast enough until it looks like the picture

if they actually consider how i get the answer i would score a lot lower than i do

Title: Re: standard IQ test undervalue
Post by: Natalia Evans on August 25, 2009, 01:12:27 PM
I scored in the mentally retarded range growing up and then I started to score normal by the time I was 10. I heard lot of autistic kids score low on IQ tests while aspie kids score in the average or above average range. I scored in the above average when I was 12 but that was maybe a mistake. I was given IQ test growing up so perhaps I had practice at them. I think I took them every year. I think they do that to every special ed kid when they are in elementary school. Especially if parents keep trying to find what the heck is wrong with their child, doctors want to test their IQ. I quit going to lot of doctors after my diagnoses. There weren't literally lot of doctors but I went to lot of appointments with the same ones and sometimes it be a random one.

Hey the reason why autistic kids would score low is because those tests aren't designed for them, they're designed for normal people. Give a blind person an IQ test that requires you to see, they will also score low on it. Give a deaf person a IQ test that requires hearing and don't give them any sign language, they will also score low. Give an illiterate person an IQ test that requires reading, they will also score low. Give a concrete thinker an abstract IQ test and they will also score low on it. See anyone can score low on an IQ test if they have any sort of disability. They just need to be given the right IQ test.

Hey give a person an IQ test that is in another language and they will also score low on it.

I don't know what kind of IQ tests teachers gave me growing up. My dad said it was because I couldn't talk well so it made me score low. Hey I was talking well at age 6 but my score went up every year. When I was 8 I scored in the low 80's. It was an 83.