How many Rolf Harris victims does it take to change a light bulb? 50. Three to do it now and then 47 to do it thirty years later when it is more profitable.
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Most likely, which is why I don't believe there's a snowball's chance in hell that a small minority of essentially disabled people can change the inner workings of a society. Disrupt it, maybe, and get jailed for it and make the rest of us even larger targets than we are now, yes, but actually change it? No way.
Quote from: odeon on June 04, 2009, 01:14:14 AMMost likely, which is why I don't believe there's a snowball's chance in hell that a small minority of essentially disabled people can change the inner workings of a society. Disrupt it, maybe, and get jailed for it and make the rest of us even larger targets than we are now, yes, but actually change it? No way.You could stop calling us disabled to start with. If I am together with 99 average NTs only 2 of them are more intelligent than I am. Considering that I don't see myself as disabled.
Quote from: TheoK on June 04, 2009, 02:40:39 AMQuote from: odeon on June 04, 2009, 01:14:14 AMMost likely, which is why I don't believe there's a snowball's chance in hell that a small minority of essentially disabled people can change the inner workings of a society. Disrupt it, maybe, and get jailed for it and make the rest of us even larger targets than we are now, yes, but actually change it? No way.You could stop calling us disabled to start with. If I am together with 99 average NTs only 2 of them are more intelligent than I am. Considering that I don't see myself as disabled.I thought you were intelligent. Two average NTs would be more intelligent than you out of 99? Not impressed!!
Quote from: TheoK on June 04, 2009, 02:40:39 AMQuote from: odeon on June 04, 2009, 01:14:14 AMMost likely, which is why I don't believe there's a snowball's chance in hell that a small minority of essentially disabled people can change the inner workings of a society. Disrupt it, maybe, and get jailed for it and make the rest of us even larger targets than we are now, yes, but actually change it? No way.You could stop calling us disabled to start with. If I am together with 99 average NTs only 2 of them are more intelligent than I am. Considering that I don't see myself as disabled.AFAIK, the state pays you a monthly allowance because you, by definition, are disabled. Want to be called something else? Get a job and stop being a hypocrite. You can't both have the cake and eat it.You claim to have a reasonably high IQ. Start using it.
Quote from: Trigger11 on June 04, 2009, 01:00:03 PMQuote from: TheoK on June 04, 2009, 02:40:39 AMQuote from: odeon on June 04, 2009, 01:14:14 AMMost likely, which is why I don't believe there's a snowball's chance in hell that a small minority of essentially disabled people can change the inner workings of a society. Disrupt it, maybe, and get jailed for it and make the rest of us even larger targets than we are now, yes, but actually change it? No way.You could stop calling us disabled to start with. If I am together with 99 average NTs only 2 of them are more intelligent than I am. Considering that I don't see myself as disabled.I thought you were intelligent. Two average NTs would be more intelligent than you out of 99? Not impressed!!97 of them would not. But I'm not completely satisfied with it, of course. 1 out of 1000 would be better.
Quote from: odeon on June 04, 2009, 01:11:14 PMQuote from: TheoK on June 04, 2009, 02:40:39 AMQuote from: odeon on June 04, 2009, 01:14:14 AMMost likely, which is why I don't believe there's a snowball's chance in hell that a small minority of essentially disabled people can change the inner workings of a society. Disrupt it, maybe, and get jailed for it and make the rest of us even larger targets than we are now, yes, but actually change it? No way.You could stop calling us disabled to start with. If I am together with 99 average NTs only 2 of them are more intelligent than I am. Considering that I don't see myself as disabled.AFAIK, the state pays you a monthly allowance because you, by definition, are disabled. Want to be called something else? Get a job and stop being a hypocrite. You can't both have the cake and eat it.You claim to have a reasonably high IQ. Start using it.So you're not "disabled" then? What are you doing administrating an Aspie site then?
That's not impressive either, to be honest!
Quote from: Trigger11 on June 04, 2009, 01:22:48 PMThat's not impressive either, to be honest!Well, that's the intelligence on paper. Some people have 180 and are still stupid and/or cowardly. But you must have a relatively high formal IQ to have a very high overall intelligence.
Quote from: TheoK on June 04, 2009, 01:18:25 PMQuote from: odeon on June 04, 2009, 01:11:14 PMQuote from: TheoK on June 04, 2009, 02:40:39 AMQuote from: odeon on June 04, 2009, 01:14:14 AMMost likely, which is why I don't believe there's a snowball's chance in hell that a small minority of essentially disabled people can change the inner workings of a society. Disrupt it, maybe, and get jailed for it and make the rest of us even larger targets than we are now, yes, but actually change it? No way.You could stop calling us disabled to start with. If I am together with 99 average NTs only 2 of them are more intelligent than I am. Considering that I don't see myself as disabled.AFAIK, the state pays you a monthly allowance because you, by definition, are disabled. Want to be called something else? Get a job and stop being a hypocrite. You can't both have the cake and eat it.You claim to have a reasonably high IQ. Start using it.So you're not "disabled" then? What are you doing administrating an Aspie site then?Actually I am disabled, by definition, since I have an ASD dx,. I am entitled to certain services and assistance, just as you are. My IQ is significantly higher than yours, but I suspect that my tests just as uneven as yours. I choose to use my intelligence more constructively than you, however.As for why I'm an admin here: I guess I'm just lucky.