And I feel no need to take your version of the events as proof that you have any idea of what went on.
I don't even have a version of the events in this case, so WTF are you talking about?
whole dissertation on what has happened both with the Nazis and the Holocaust as well as Asperger's quote are the examples of a mind that is so willing to be indoctrinated, and yet unwilling to believe that the indoctrination is in fact lies, mis-truths and pure specualtive hyperbole.
You're the prejudiced one, not I.
everyone has various filters based on life experience, aganeda, etc., and so interpretation can be ever so slightly skewed, no matter how objective one tries to be.
I'm 100% Aspie. I don't filter at all. I just rationally analyse the data to figure out what is BS and what is not.
you argue a load of crap, citing all sorts of sources, and you haven't taken that into consideration?
I ALWAYS take into consideration that people might have an agenda, regardless of the source.
What does an pathetic idiotic moron like you know about brains anyway?
I would explain but you wouldn't understand.
I strongly doubt that. Just try me.
to mention the translator or how the translator's personal views on Asperger's motivations are remotely relevant, unless they are based on evidence and therefore verifiable. In that case, her sources matter.
In other words, you see no reason to include information disproving your views.
In other words, I see no reason to include speculatory statements.
You somehow seem to mix up disagreement with disproval.