Social Niceties et al - WAS: Odeon, provide proof please.

[GalileoAce]

This is just a small call out. In keeping with the site's theme: "Be prepared to back up your words". As such, I'd like the Pretty Tyrant to provide proof to back up this claim:

There's a difference: Vodzy, the little cunt, did it on purpose, after having read my post.

EDIT: Change topic title to match current discussion

[DirtDawg]

Odeon can never prove whether or not Vodzy read the post he made reference to.

He can only determine for sure whether Vodzy opened the page that Odeon's post appeared on or not and match some time signatures. It doesn't mean that he has proof that Vodzy read anything on the page.

What is this about?

[GalileoAce]

It's about respecting each other. Odeon has no right to insult Vodzy in the manner he has been doing. Whether Vodzy's actions were deliberate or not is indeterminate.

[DirtDawg]

It's about respecting each other. Odeon has no right to insult Vodzy in the manner he has been doing. Whether Vodzy's actions were deliberate or not is indeterminate.

OK


It's Vodzy's turn next.

[GalileoAce]

It's about respecting each other. Odeon has no right to insult Vodzy in the manner he has been doing. Whether Vodzy's actions were deliberate or not is indeterminate.

OK
It's Vodzy's turn next.

Well, no. If Vodzy's actions were deliberate, I can't see a way for Odeon to have known that, so his insults were still unwarranted.

[DirtDawg]

Well, then., I'm off some.

You want to hear from Odeaon next. See, I want to hear from Vodzy, first.

I suspect that Odeaon knows something that we can not, from what has been posted.

This is why Vodzy HAS to be next.

What Odeon knows will remain, but what we don't know is Vodzy's mind.


Odeon has posted.

[GalileoAce]

Knowing Vodzy's mind will be of benefit indeed, but it is not the crux of my angst toward Odeon.

[Phlexor]

Are you serious? It's Vodzy we are talking about. He sure didn't do cos he likes helping little old ladies across the street if you know what I mean.

And I'm sure Vodzy wouldn't have it any other way.

[GalileoAce]

Are you serious? It's Vodzy we are talking about. He sure didn't do cos he likes helping little old ladies across the street if you know what I mean.
And I'm sure Vodzy wouldn't have it any other way.

I think it's serious that the Webmonkey and Domain owner insults members of the site without proof (seemingly). Whether or not this is Modus Operandi for Vodzy is an aside to this. Sure character reference does go a ways to help proving someone's guilt, but it's evidence that is a the key. So what evidence did Odeon have that Vodzy deliberately posted the quote quote after Odeon's request; what evidence is there that it wasn't a deliberate action but rather a mistake? As far as I can tell there is none either way.  I always thought presumption of innocence was the way to go.

[DirtDawg]

Whoops.

I just noticed that I was posting in a place where my comments do not aplly.

I will start a peanut gallery thread when I next stop by, if it's not already been done..

[GalileoAce]

I thought the callout threads were open to discussion? But the Main Event thread was not?

[vodz]

I did it on purpose. I couldn't help it.

Odeon didn't know that. He has a grudge against me for blocking him and his slut (they have since been unblocked, for I do not hold grudges).

He's lucky he locked the thread after he threatened me with banning. I couldn't resist that bait! Bugger

Are you serious? It's Vodzy we are talking about. He sure didn't do cos he likes helping little old ladies across the street if you know what I mean.

And I'm sure Vodzy wouldn't have it any other way.

FYI MF, I go out of my way to walk old ladies home! No shit!

[vodz]

Are you serious? It's Vodzy we are talking about. He sure didn't do cos he likes helping little old ladies across the street if you know what I mean.
And I'm sure Vodzy wouldn't have it any other way.

I think it's serious that the Webmonkey and Domain owner insults members of the site without proof (seemingly). Whether or not this is Modus Operandi for Vodzy is an aside to this. Sure character reference does go a ways to help proving someone's guilt, but it's evidence that is a the key. So what evidence did Odeon have that Vodzy deliberately posted the quote quote after Odeon's request; what evidence is there that it wasn't a deliberate action but rather a mistake? As far as I can tell there is none either way.  I always thought presumption of innocence was the way to go.

Damn straight.

[vodz]

Well, then., I'm off some.

You want to hear from Odeaon next. See, I want to hear from Vodzy, first.

I suspect that Odeaon knows something that we can not, from what has been posted.

This is why Vodzy HAS to be next.

What Odeon knows will remain, but what we don't know is Vodzy's mind.


Odeon has posted.

You logic is flawed.

Odeon never backed up his claim. You are merely assume he knew my intentions.

In Australia at least, one is innocent until PROVEN otherwise.

[vodz]

I did it on purpose. I couldn't help it.

Odeon didn't know that. He has a grudge against me for blocking him and his slut (they have since been unblocked, for I do not hold grudges).

He's lucky he locked the thread after he threatened me with banning. I couldn't resist that bait! Bugger

Are you serious? It's Vodzy we are talking about. He sure didn't do cos he likes helping little old ladies across the street if you know what I mean.

And I'm sure Vodzy wouldn't have it any other way.

Sorry that should be blabberising, not banning (though the difference is a bee's dick).

FYI MF, I go out of my way to walk old ladies home! No shit!