Okay I'm confused. Lot of you seem to find it okay he had sex with a 13 year old but you guys didn't find it okay when grael was in a relationship with flagg and you guys called her a pedo for it. So why isn't it okay for her to date someone under 18 but it's okay for the director to have sex with someone who was 13 at the time while Grael's online bf was only 16?
Having sex with a minor under the age of consent is worse than dating one IMO.
I think that what Roman Polanski did is completely despicable and I think that he should be castrated.
My daughter is not that much younger than 13 and if someone raped her, I could wield the rusty razor blade to do the job myself.
I also think that Graelwyn was wrong to groom Flagg into being her "boyfriend" because she was twice his age.
I think that she was a pedophile to try to seduce him but it's not on the same level as what Roman Polanski did.
If Flagg had been 16 and she had been 18 (which would be considered a legal adult in Oregon) I personally would not have had that much of a problem with it, but things are too unequal when there is that much age difference, IMO.
And if she is trying now to make it seem like Flagg conned her or something, then that sounds unlikely to me. I think that it is more likely that he finally came to his senses and realized that she was way too old for him, or maybe that she was wrong for him for some other reasons as well. Why should he not be allowed to realize that he made a mistake and get out of a bad situation?