Confucius say: "Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life."
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: choccybiccy on April 20, 2008, 02:07:41 PMArrrgh!!! This is awful, not only does it seem like he raped this girl but he then used the age of consent laws to make it into something lesser Sheer brilliance.Quote from: odeon on April 20, 2008, 02:21:00 PMHe raped the girl by definition. Anything sexual with a 13-yo was then (and is now?), by definition, rape.True, but the word 'statutory' inserted in their reduces the effect, in some courts.
Arrrgh!!! This is awful, not only does it seem like he raped this girl but he then used the age of consent laws to make it into something lesser
He raped the girl by definition. Anything sexual with a 13-yo was then (and is now?), by definition, rape.
14:10 - Moarskrillex42: She said something about knowing why I wanted to move to Glasgow when she came in. She plopped down on my bed and told me to go ahead and open it for her.14:11 - Peter5930: So, she thought I was your lover and that I was sending you a box full of sex toys, and that you wanted to move to Glasgow to be with me?
Quote from: Spokane Girl on April 20, 2008, 08:38:55 AMOkay I'm confused. Lot of you seem to find it okay he had sex with a 13 year old but you guys didn't find it okay when grael was in a relationship with flagg and you guys called her a pedo for it. So why isn't it okay for her to date someone under 18 but it's okay for the director to have sex with someone who was 13 at the time while Grael's online bf was only 16? Having sex with a minor under the age of consent is worse than dating one IMO. Grael wasn't using drugs.
Okay I'm confused. Lot of you seem to find it okay he had sex with a 13 year old but you guys didn't find it okay when grael was in a relationship with flagg and you guys called her a pedo for it. So why isn't it okay for her to date someone under 18 but it's okay for the director to have sex with someone who was 13 at the time while Grael's online bf was only 16? Having sex with a minor under the age of consent is worse than dating one IMO.
Quote from: Pidgeon extraordinaire on April 20, 2008, 01:24:05 PMQuote from: Spokane Girl on April 20, 2008, 08:38:55 AMOkay I'm confused. Lot of you seem to find it okay he had sex with a 13 year old but you guys didn't find it okay when grael was in a relationship with flagg and you guys called her a pedo for it. So why isn't it okay for her to date someone under 18 but it's okay for the director to have sex with someone who was 13 at the time while Grael's online bf was only 16? Having sex with a minor under the age of consent is worse than dating one IMO. Grael wasn't using drugs.Are you saying he was using drugs when he raped a 13 year old?
I thought you were saying he was on drugs when he raped here. I still don't understand then how drugging a 13 year old is okay but it wasn't okay when Grael was in a relationship with a 16 year old. So confusing.
Quote from: Spokane Girl on April 20, 2008, 09:27:40 PMI thought you were saying he was on drugs when he raped here. I still don't understand then how drugging a 13 year old is okay but it wasn't okay when Grael was in a relationship with a 16 year old. So confusing. Sometimes, it's easier NOT to try andunderstand the minds of those people.
Why on ALL of us? Though, I do haveto say that I see a difference, giventhat she never actually had sex with flagg, nor did she drug him. Indeed,I would argue he rather played her.
Grael is no Roman.
Quote from: Pidgeon extraordinaire on April 20, 2008, 10:37:48 PMWhy on ALL of us? Though, I do haveto say that I see a difference, giventhat she never actually had sex with flagg, nor did she drug him. Indeed,I would argue he rather played her.So why is it okay to drug a 13 year old and have sex but not okay to date a 16 year old? I think drugging and raping a 13 year old is worse than dating a 16 year old. What gives?