Father-Daugther incestous couple have come out

[thepeaguy]

All I can say is it's against society's standards to bring a child into it.

Better.

[Peter]

All I can say is it's wrong to bring a child into it.

Is it wrong to bring a child into a bum-loving gay couple?

Gays aren't as "taboo" as incest. I'm sure the child would get less shit at school if it had gay parents.

So people should only have kids if those kids will fit in at school?  Once upon a time, gays were very much taboo, and a kid with gay parents could count on a tough childhood.  Does that mean it used to be wrong for gays to have kids, but it's ok now?

Depends on the couple
Not all gay couple have anal sex though, and I don't think that has anything to do with their ability to raise a child

I agree, it doesn't have anything to do with their ability to raise a child, and since bumfucking parents are as much grounds for teasing as incestuous parents, incest has no more effect on it than bumfucking.

Many straight couples with kids have anal sex.  It's not just a thing reserved for the gays.

So, do you think anal sex makes people bad parents?  After all, if word got out, the kids might get teased about it and burdened with the social stigma.

[Callaway]

the couple had a healthy baby first and the second died.

No, their first child died and their second child lived.

District Court sentencing judge Steven Millsteed said the first count of incest was based on an act of sexual intercourse which resulted in the birth of the couple's first child.

The second count of incest related to an act of sexual intercourse which resulted in the birth of their second child in May last year.

"The first child was born in 2001 but died a few days after birth due to a congenital heart disease," Judge Millsteed said.

Peter said: 

Dr. Carl Olstrom, a Swedish psychiatrist experienced in the study of fetal deformity resulting from incest, reports: "There is no evidence to support the assumption that children resulting from incestuous relationships run a greater risk of being malformed than other children."

 

However, the rest of the quote said: 

Other, smaller studies have shown serious birth defects in up to one fourth of all children who were conceived through bloodline incest, an incidence that is about fifteen times the expected normal frequency.

[Calandale]

All I can say is it's wrong to bring a child into it.

Is it wrong to bring a child into a bum-loving gay couple?

Gays aren't as "taboo" as incest. I'm sure the child would get less shit at school if it had gay parents.

So people should only have kids if those kids will fit in at school?  Once upon a time, gays were very much taboo, and a kid with gay parents could count on a tough childhood.  Does that mean it used to be wrong for gays to have kids, but it's ok now?

This is likely to be exactly right. Morality seems largely a matter
of societal standards (the rest being instinct). I don't know about the
"fitting in" part, but it's clearly society's way of telling you that you
aren't moral. Of course, certain principles can conflict.

I agree, it doesn't have anything to do with their ability to raise a child, and since bumfucking parents are as much grounds for teasing as incestuous parents, incest has no more effect on it than bumfucking.

Most kids don't know whose parents are ass fucking.
When a kid introduces his mom, Steve, that's pretty apparent.

[Calandale]

Peter said: 

Dr. Carl Olstrom, a Swedish psychiatrist experienced in the study of fetal deformity resulting from incest, reports: "There is no evidence to support the assumption that children resulting from incestuous relationships run a greater risk of being malformed than other children."

 

However, the rest of the quote said: 

Other, smaller studies have shown serious birth defects in up to one fourth of all children who were conceived through bloodline incest, an incidence that is about fifteen times the expected normal frequency.

Which is just normal scientific hedging. 
It would be dishonest to not report that there were
contradictory studies.

[Sophgay]

When a kid introduces his mom, Steve, that's pretty apparent.

Why would the kid have a mom called Steve?

[Calandale]

When a kid introduces his mom, Steve, that's pretty apparent.

Why would the kid have a mom called Steve?

Short for steven.

[Sophgay]

There aren't many women called Steven

[Calandale]

Gee, is something dawning? 

[Sophgay]

Gee, is something dawning? 

So then he wouldn't have a mom called Steve

[Teejay]

All I can say is it's against society's standards to bring a child into it.

Better.

Incest is a taboo in practically every society in human history, Ancient Egypt is the only society I know of which did not have incest as a taboo.

Have a look at the book of Leviticus in old testament there is two verses (Leviticus 18:22) and (Leviticus 20:13) banning homosexual relations between men, while there are a lot more banning various forms of incest.

[Calandale]

Gee, is something dawning? 

So then he wouldn't have a mom called Steve

Taking lessons in being dense?

[Calandale]

All I can say is it's against society's standards to bring a child into it.

Better.

Incest is a taboo in practically every society in human history, Ancient Egypt is the only society I know of which did not have incest as a taboo.

Depends on the level. Parents and children, definitely.
Brother and sister, usually. And there are good reasons,
in terms of viability of the species. Such inbreeding is terrible,
as a habit. Individual cases don't much matter, but if it's the
norm, it would lead to rapid loss of traits from the gene pool.

[Sophgay]

Gee, is something dawning? 

So then he wouldn't have a mom called Steve

Taking lessons in being dense?

No. YOU are the one being dense. I know exactly what you're saying.
But "Steve" wouldn't be the kid's mom
He'd have 2 dads

[SovaNu]

maybe he could be called Stevette.