Obviously, you are still wrong, get used to it buddy.
I'm still waiting for ANYONE to debunk the arguments I presented in earlier posts. Thusfar, none has even attempted to do so.
Remind me again why we have to? I mean it seems it's only something you want. Again it's all about what you want. Aren't you getting sick of Controlling playtime?
If I don't like someone or agree with them, I call them an idiot.
So anyone not applying to your own very personal standard of truth or morallity is an idiot?!?
Oh look folks! He
can learn new tricks.
Why should I as an amateur historian have less right to judge than professional historians or those who actually lived back then? I've read and heard testimonies from all sides. I've seen numerous pictures, numerous documents, numerous videos, etc. I've met people who were sent for forced labor to Germany and I've met people who had to run from the German bombs, but I've also met SS-veterans. etc. I've done all I could to see the issue from as many perspectives as possible and make up my mind only afterwards.
I don't believe you.
You not believing me doesn't make these statements any less true. Besides.... why would I lie about all this?
There you go again. When ever someone says "why would I lie about all this?", you know they are lying.
That's just offensive prejudiced rubbish and you know it.
Do I? Do you? I mean apparently you see it in me, but when you do it, it isn't.
For someone claiming to have an IQ over 130, you sure succeed in missing the obvious.
Who says I missed anything? Just because I didn't answer you in the way you wanted me to doesn't mean I missed anything. I do what
I want, not what
you want. Are you trying to control playtime again? Gee, you must of aced that DX.
I understand that it might sound a bit strange to move from one frame of thought to another in just a few years, but that's the consequence of being unprejudiced and openminded. I find it quite ironic that people like you accused my of bigotry, while bigotry is something entirely alien to me.
Just because you don't have the ability to recognise it in yourself, doesn't mean you aren't doing it.
Actually, it's one of my friends who first pointed out to me that he had never encountered a single person in his life as unprejudiced as I.
There you go with your 'friend testimonial again'. I mean how are we meant to argue that? In fact, how are we meant to believe it? How are we meant to believe you even have friends?
You make (false) assumptions about historical facts and about people's motivations without any thorough investigation. That's prejudiced.
That's your opinion, not mine, and I happen to disagree with you.
Thusfar you haven't been willing or able to produce a single arguments against the views I expressed.
Did I need to? Who said? Ooh wait! Let me guess! I should know this one...
(just pointing out that that is sarcasm, because you obviously haven't been able to recognise it yet thus far)Well that's the final nail in your coffin there. Someone who has a disability who thinks that they are better than the majority of people out there.
AS is not a disability. It's just a way of processing data that deviates from the norm. People with AS can outperform NTs on various levels,, because they're less prewired... although it all depends on what they've learned during their lives.
Perhaps. But in an NT society, you are disabled. Sorry. If this was a different type of society, perhaps you wouldn't be, but it isn't that way, is it.
Maybe we should list all the things they they can do that we can't then? I'm sure they would argue that they can outperform us as well.
Maybe we just think your ideas and so called facts are just so utterly stupid to even give the time of day.
That's what makes you prejudiced.
No, that's what makes us smart and spend out time more wisely.
btw, calling me prejudiced doesn't upset me or goad me into coming up with a spiffy arguement.
Mine is around the same as yours too. But as we all know, IQ tests just measure how well you can do IQ tests.
IQ tests are insufficient as ways to measure overall intelligence, but they're definitely strong indicators of a person's cognitive abilities.
Doesn't mean they put them to good use, not that that means anything, considering, I'm sure, that you and I have different ideas on what constitutes 'good use'.
So again, it still means nothing.
was it something I said?