I thought my family was fucked up

[Natalia Evans]

So if a guy had his balls taken off, they can be put back on?


I thought anything that is cut off, you have certain amount of time to get to the hospital and have it put back on before that part dies.


So what if a guy was castrated and then five years later, he was proven innocent? How can he have his balls put back on? That body part would be long gone and already decayed of they threw it out. Or can you have someone else's balls put on you and bam you have a sex drive again.

[Soph]

lol this is hilarious

[Calandale]

 

[Callaway]

So if a guy had his balls taken off, they can be put back on?


I thought anything that is cut off, you have certain amount of time to get to the hospital and have it put back on before that part dies.


So what if a guy was castrated and then five years later, he was proven innocent? How can he have his balls put back on? That body part would be long gone and already decayed of they threw it out. Or can you have someone else's balls put on you and bam you have a sex drive again.

No, you are right.  Castration is irreversible, if you are talking about this kind:



Chemical castration would be reversible, where the man takes injections of Depo-Provera or some other hormonal drug to stop his sex drive.

A vasectomy, where they snip the Vas Deferens to prevent the flow of sperm into the semen, might be reversible, but that would just sterilize the person, not reduce or eliminate his sex drive.

[Calandale]

Though, even physical castration
doesn't always remove drive (nor ability).

I've noticed this directly, with dogs.

[Al Swearegen]

Problem is, it's really one really fucked up thing.
Like, they'd be okay, if they could be completely
isolated from children.

Sterilization and penal colony.

They can molest kids even if they are sterilized.   All sterilization does is ensure they don't impregnate someone.   Castration only ensures that they can't molest with their genitals (they still have their hands).   Penal colonies are a waste of money.   Why spend money keeping someone like that alive?   IMO it is better to kill prisoners who are going to spend life in prison anyways.   A bullet only costs a few cents, I will shoot them for free myself.

Same.

I often tell people I think the type of people who do shit like this out to be thrown down a big hole with a couple of half-starved feral pigs. Shoulda seen the response on AFF. Poor pedophiles. I said the thought that there was one less sick in the world that may at some point have contact with my or other children the better.

Fuck give me legal endorsement and I will be the executioner. NO problem.

[Soph]

One kid not being abused by some piece of shit paedophile is more important than the "rights" of that padeophile IMO. And you can't take chances with something like that. Once they've raped/abused a child, they forfeit any rights they may have had as far as I'm concerned.

[Calandale]

Step back, for a moment, and look at pedophilia
as a religion (there are similarities).

Should we treat those who inflict their harmful
mindsets on children the same way?

[Al Swearegen]

Hmmmm.....as a comparison I do not think it is nearly as severe. Maybe such people ought only be bastinadoed.

[Soph]

Step back, for a moment, and look at pedophilia
as a religion (there are similarities).

Should we treat those who inflict their harmful
mindsets on children the same way?

I don't think we should shoot them. They usually think they're helping their kids from what I've seen. We could just sterilise all the religious people first and avoid this problem 

[Calandale]

So, if a pedophile thought he was
HELPING, 'twould be ok?   

[Soph]

No. paedophilia and religion will be banned in my empire

[Calandale]

I'd just make them irrelevant.