I think that if it is not fair to bash all Muslims for the action of (ostensibly) a few, then it is also not fair to uniformly bash people who are distrustful or confused about Muslims. People can only function based on their own experiences and information. If someone's experience has led them to have an unfair opinion of Muslims, surely it is better to open up a dialogue and add to their information (or change it , if incorrect) than to constantly repeat "bigot", "hyperbole" "I'm laughing at you" etc. The Muslim bashers are just people who are genuinely confused for the reasons of the liberal's defending.
OK. Valid points. I hear what you are saying, and I'm sorry I dismissed you earlier. The one point I disagree with is the one I've marked in bold: In my experience, the majority of the Muslim bashers are certainly confused, but not for reasons having anything to do with anything the Liberals (also known as "Muslim apologists") say. The vocal ones often thrive on the hate-mongering, the appeal to the reader's fear of the unknown, and the general uneasiness in the Western world regarding any Muslims.
Certainly, after 9/11 it's been easy for these people to appeal to those fears.
If you look at the on-and-off debate re Muslims in this forum, you'll find little in way of balanced views and dialogue, unfortunately. More often than not, the discussion is polarised, resulting in hyperbole and name-calling, and quite frankly, I was tired of it long before you posted, hence my reply (for which I'm sorry).