Interested your opinion.
Garry Johnson seemed like a bit of a one issue candidate. Smoking dope and legalisation seemed to be the big issue. I do not think is OVERLY important. I am indifferent. It is not of NO value or UNIMPORTANT but it is not a big one.
I admit some of that may be political framing. The "Where is Aleppo?" thing was a big beat up that I thought was pretty unimportant in the scheme of things. He just came across as a bit of a nothing.
He was an effective governor of New Mexico but had almost no charisma. I don't think he was a one issue candidate, rather a one philosophy candidate, he just wanted to change the direction of the Federal government to stop its growth and perhaps shrink it.
Jill Stein? She Seems pretty moral and decent and I think I could probably to at least some extent hitch my values to most of her wagons. But she fucked up too if I remember. Something about flying to the wrong city for a rally or something which seemed about as silly as you can get.
How do you think the 4 candidates measured up to each other. Hell how the five did (including Bernie)?
Donald Trump = Carnival Barker, P.T. Barnum.
Hillary Clinton = political corruption personified
Jill Stein and Bernie Sanders =well meaning hippie socialists
Gary Johnson = well meaning pothead minarchist.
I agreed with Bernie Sanders in his crusade for campaign finance reform, it's the #1 problem in US politics. The rest of his socialism stuff I'm opposed to.
"Is she gone yet?"