The flow direction aka flow of string energy direction, is basically what determines spin (still speculating here). Hypothetically, the strings contain photon 'joints' holding the string packets together and they loop around each branch in the specified direction. This looping also leads to stress points which cause a joint and string to imprint a behaviour to space-time. A branch is basically a single loop of energy from core to core, and the number of charged string loops determine electric charge strength. All fermions contain three branch loops, while bosons contain six. Or alternatively it could be that, fermions are odd numbered, bosons are even numbered in branches.
This you will have problems with if you take composite fermions into account. I assume you know about skyrmions (fermions made of bosons) and quantum field theory?
To answer your previous question first, yeah, the time axis is presented as linear with frames for now.
Now that's a problem cos time doesn't have to be linear.
Not sure what you mean on time not always being linear, if you're referring to the effects of time dilation, I'm working on that problem.
However, I'm not familiar with skyrmions and not too familiar with quasi-particles either, and I only know the very basics of quantum field theory. The truth is, I'm never good at gauging myself on how much I know something.
Quantum field theory is interesting but I'm not sure I buy it.
I always felt upon looking at Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory, that it was too overcomplicated. Hence why I was motivated to attempt my own take on it all. My work tends to make unconventional, if not controversial turns from standard ideas, because the goal is simplicity. Anyway, the reason why I had to make the branches rule in my theory like that was because it needed to be to allow for beta decay behaviour, while at the same explain why W/Z particles are bosons. I also tried a Higgless approach to its mass by suggesting a momentarily distortion of vacuum energy leads to it, but this would imply a gravitational force emerging temporarily (could be why it appears so massive, it's an illusion of energy absorption perhaps?). I could be using wrong terminology but I was never good at explain things in words.
Below shows one aspect of beta decay, the neutron decay.
Fig 1. A free neutron, however the gluon points show that a pulling effect will emerge that forces the up quark towards the down quarks. Under nucleus circumstances, there's usually another gluon network that cancels out this pulling, thus the neutron is usually stable in that case (except of course, in beta decay when an irregularity forms).
Fig 2. Demonstrates what happens when the up quark forces it way to occupy too closely to it's down quark neighbours. Due to this compression, it forces the quarks to change so they can fit together as perfectly as possible again. However as a consequence, energy needs to be expelled. This leftover energy is shot out from the nearest point, which composes into a neutral and charged string. When these two collide at the same point, a core point is established which causes them to loop around until the structure is closed in loops. However due to the overlapping, multiple core points form which are secondary to their primary one, leading to a energy surge that causes this particle to become massive in size and quite unstable.
This is a problem because I still need to explain a muon's decay mode as well as the Bottom Omega Baryon's for example via W/Z bosons. Also this shows that any number of quarks can invoke the weak interaction, and it's not always confined to one.
It's a problem, but I still found the idea rather interesting though.
Fig 3. This basically shows that due to the multiple cores and depending how much energy is actually flowing (which is the amount that was dispelled, as opposed to stored at core points via vacuum energy absorption) a core point on opposing ends become a core and stress points, leading to two particles being produced.
Fig 4. The resulting particle in this case are an electron and antineutrino. Under higher dispelled energy circumstances, too much energy is available to just produce an electron and antineutrino, so the branches will have to deform and form hadrons instead.
Funnily enough, it was beta decay and how W/Z bosons are massive that got me so interested in physics.
I also provide a second picture below to try and figure out what the bosons would look like. I'm still in debate with some of their shapes, but I'll show them anyway.
[attachment deleted by admin]
