My theory looks promising and unconventional, but it's making strange predictions. Haven't quite figure out how to interpret it yet, or whenever or not I made an error.
Is it something that you could describe to us without us needing to understand a lot of exotic maths, and without putting your Nobel Prize at risk of being stolen?
I doubt I'd get that far, not even close to being taken seriously. I'm hardly a genius, not a physicist and I only know basic mathematics. Sorry if I made it sound fantastic.
I'm basically working on a theory of everything that present a string like structure to elementary particles. Based on how these strings loop around a core point and what way they fluctuate and flow, they determine the elementary particle's entire makeup. It's tricky to explain it because while I work on this theory, I draw these particles as 2D representations and try to figure things out visually. However that's the real idea behind my theory; It's to formulate a visual representation of everything, and how and why it works in a simplified yet effective fashion.