do you recall what your karma count was before that post?
Nope- sorry, was some where in the low 70's I think.
so then we can conclude that the karma system is based apon content, rather than a popularity contest...
Actually, once the site had been running a few weeks I no-longer believed it was a popularity contest. Sure the members that post the most seem to have the highest karma, however I believe that's because more posts=more chance of making someone laugh or an insightful post.
Look at your pms topic for instance- people have been keeping your karma on a steady 69 for a few weeks, you post that topic and suddenly your karma starts dropping. If it really was a popularity contest would people have bothered to smite you for that topic?
I know that Omega has used the fact that both her and Robert's karma keeps dropping despite them not posting as a sign that it is a popularity contest- but I think she's failed to take into account that although they haven't been posting here they've still been slagging Intensity and its members elsewhere. So its highly possible that they are still being smited for their attitude towards the members, rather than simply because they're not part of the popular crowd.