i think it's nice to put up a little warning above a gross picture. or even better post a link.
cum condoms don't seem gross to me, however some of Peter's pictures have scratched my corneas so to speak. 
everyone has different tastes and yuck buttons. i don't think a cum condom pic should be banned anymore than something else that causes people to feel ill, but then i don't think we should have such rules at all. at the most a suggestion to post a link instead of a gross picture or put a warning or post them in a gross picture thread. any rule that isn't absolutely fair and necessary, i'm against it. i dunno if Eclair was kidding about that. 
what if a more popular member posted a picture of a cum filled condom?
is it that we just discriminate against richard?
cum in a condom is not attractive - period. Richard playing with his cum is his business, but I'd prefer not to see it.
As for other members, not sure. I'm not one to encourage it publicly!
No, no, you misunderstood. I wasn't for one minute saying it should be a rule.
When I said 'as for other members, not sure' - I was answering McJ's question as to whether it was just because it was Richards. As in as for seeing other members doing it, I'm not sure....and then I said I wouldn't ecourage it publicly...which meant I wouldn't say yes or no here
No, if people stopped posting the shock pics...it would be a boring place indeed!
Sort of like when Dunc had that vomiting dog avatar...it amused me as much as it grossed me out...
