If it is a science, it should improve sooner or later enough for it to intrest me. I am not convinced it is going to happen anytime soon. Look how much younger CS is, and how much further that has got, relative to psychology. They tend to nail these maths problems in the end, as you have shown. It just takes time.
So something has to interest YOU and convince YOU before it can be considered a science? I am humbled by your presence.
As for computer science (did I mention that this is what my degree is in?), of course it's improved faster. I can set a system to run a million tests and have the results within a day. A psychology study, on the other hand, usually involves people and questionnaires and takes excessive amounts of time to administer and gather the responses before you can even get to the analysis.
Now, I'm not trying to be belligerent. I'm more of a 'hard' sciences kind of person myself. It's easier when everything can be placed in nice, neat columns, black or white, 1 or 0. But humans are analog, there's a lot of gray area. We are all different, unique, individual. There's commonality, sure. If there weren't, psych would never be able to exist. Of course, we'd never have gotten off the ground as a species either. But dismissing something just because it doesn't make sense to your worldview is only limiting yourself.