"We have normality. I repeat, we have normality. Anything you still can't cope with is therefore your own problem." -Douglas Adams
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Have you seen Benny and Joon?
Does this look like a good movie?
Quote from: Spokane Girl on August 08, 2007, 01:54:43 PMDoes this look like a good movie?It doesnt look like the sort of thing that would appeal to me, unfortuantly.
Quote from: Hadron on August 08, 2007, 01:56:01 PMQuote from: Spokane Girl on August 08, 2007, 01:54:43 PMDoes this look like a good movie?It doesnt look like the sort of thing that would appeal to me, unfortuantly.How come? Let me guess, you don't like romance?
Quote from: Hadron on August 05, 2007, 01:06:51 PMQuote from: Björk on August 05, 2007, 12:54:29 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 04, 2007, 09:01:45 PMQuote from: Björk on August 04, 2007, 08:13:20 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 11:53:55 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 09:05:12 AMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 08:14:11 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?i don't have a math ear. i'm great at imaginary math.I am not sure you get imaginary math, its really a way of assuming you can root a negative number.i get imaginary math. i'm not an eejit. you're the eejit, remember?No you dont. If you do you can explain complex numbers, and then an Argand diagram then...excuse me but don't tell me what i get and what i don't get. i do get it. you don't. I think my further maths alevel is going to tell me otherwise, when i get the results next week. I did spend quite some time studying imaginary numbers, and i certainly understand them. Explian what you understand them as.All numbers are imaginary. Just because mathematicians chosea term which others might confuse is no reason to be an ass.
Quote from: Björk on August 05, 2007, 12:54:29 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 04, 2007, 09:01:45 PMQuote from: Björk on August 04, 2007, 08:13:20 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 11:53:55 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 09:05:12 AMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 08:14:11 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?i don't have a math ear. i'm great at imaginary math.I am not sure you get imaginary math, its really a way of assuming you can root a negative number.i get imaginary math. i'm not an eejit. you're the eejit, remember?No you dont. If you do you can explain complex numbers, and then an Argand diagram then...excuse me but don't tell me what i get and what i don't get. i do get it. you don't. I think my further maths alevel is going to tell me otherwise, when i get the results next week. I did spend quite some time studying imaginary numbers, and i certainly understand them. Explian what you understand them as.
Quote from: Hadron on August 04, 2007, 09:01:45 PMQuote from: Björk on August 04, 2007, 08:13:20 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 11:53:55 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 09:05:12 AMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 08:14:11 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?i don't have a math ear. i'm great at imaginary math.I am not sure you get imaginary math, its really a way of assuming you can root a negative number.i get imaginary math. i'm not an eejit. you're the eejit, remember?No you dont. If you do you can explain complex numbers, and then an Argand diagram then...excuse me but don't tell me what i get and what i don't get. i do get it. you don't.
Quote from: Björk on August 04, 2007, 08:13:20 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 11:53:55 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 09:05:12 AMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 08:14:11 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?i don't have a math ear. i'm great at imaginary math.I am not sure you get imaginary math, its really a way of assuming you can root a negative number.i get imaginary math. i'm not an eejit. you're the eejit, remember?No you dont. If you do you can explain complex numbers, and then an Argand diagram then...
Quote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 11:53:55 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 09:05:12 AMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 08:14:11 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?i don't have a math ear. i'm great at imaginary math.I am not sure you get imaginary math, its really a way of assuming you can root a negative number.i get imaginary math. i'm not an eejit. you're the eejit, remember?
Quote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 09:05:12 AMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 08:14:11 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?i don't have a math ear. i'm great at imaginary math.I am not sure you get imaginary math, its really a way of assuming you can root a negative number.
Quote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 08:14:11 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?i don't have a math ear. i'm great at imaginary math.
Quote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?
you're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.
Quote from: calandale on August 05, 2007, 06:03:32 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 05, 2007, 01:06:51 PMQuote from: Björk on August 05, 2007, 12:54:29 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 04, 2007, 09:01:45 PMQuote from: Björk on August 04, 2007, 08:13:20 PMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 11:53:55 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 09:05:12 AMQuote from: Hadron on August 03, 2007, 08:14:11 AMQuote from: Björk on August 03, 2007, 08:13:31 AMyou're a doolally only because you erroneoysly called me a doolally.I wouldnt use the word Erroneous. How good at math are you anyway?i don't have a math ear. i'm great at imaginary math.I am not sure you get imaginary math, its really a way of assuming you can root a negative number.i get imaginary math. i'm not an eejit. you're the eejit, remember?No you dont. If you do you can explain complex numbers, and then an Argand diagram then...excuse me but don't tell me what i get and what i don't get. i do get it. you don't. I think my further maths alevel is going to tell me otherwise, when i get the results next week. I did spend quite some time studying imaginary numbers, and i certainly understand them. Explian what you understand them as.All numbers are imaginary. Just because mathematicians chosea term which others might confuse is no reason to be an ass.
actually, cal is right, hadron. all numbers are imaginary in the same sense that words are imaginary, in that they are mere symbols to which commonly agreed values are assigned, or which represent - again, by common agreement - a thing or concept.
like i haven't thought that of you...
buildings hold up on imagination really. don't you know things disappear when noone is there to think about them...