Just so you're aware, the person who describes themselves as Q (the prick from QAnon) isn't the actual Q. John de Lancie is the actually Q. You foolish mortals
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 05:31:21 AMsame difference. it's clearly wrong.Well it is wrong in most cases, but when it amounts to satire then its perfectally acceptable in my mind.
same difference. it's clearly wrong.
Quote from: Hadron on July 16, 2007, 05:34:26 AMQuote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 05:31:21 AMsame difference. it's clearly wrong.Well it is wrong in most cases, but when it amounts to satire then its perfectally acceptable in my mind.that's different. i was talking about private people. not people in public already who have made that choice.
Quote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 01:25:29 PMQuote from: Hadron on July 16, 2007, 05:34:26 AMQuote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 05:31:21 AMsame difference. it's clearly wrong.Well it is wrong in most cases, but when it amounts to satire then its perfectally acceptable in my mind.that's different. i was talking about private people. not people in public already who have made that choice.Good that we are on the same page. Some people do deserve to be ridiculed though, so in special cases i would not object to it happening to them.
Quote from: Hadron on July 16, 2007, 05:34:26 AMQuote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 05:31:21 AMsame difference. it's clearly wrong.Well it is wrong in most cases, but when it amounts to satire then its perfectally acceptable in my mind.that's different. i was talking about private people. not people in public already who have made that choice.
Quote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 05:31:21 AMsame difference. it's clearly wrong.Well it is wrong in most cases, but when it amounts to satire then its perfectally acceptable in my mind.
Quote from: Hadron on July 16, 2007, 02:30:52 PMQuote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 01:25:29 PMQuote from: Hadron on July 16, 2007, 05:34:26 AMQuote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 05:31:21 AMsame difference. it's clearly wrong.Well it is wrong in most cases, but when it amounts to satire then its perfectally acceptable in my mind.that's different. i was talking about private people. not people in public already who have made that choice.Good that we are on the same page. Some people do deserve to be ridiculed though, so in special cases i would not object to it happening to them.So if someone posts vids of Michael Jackson being beaten, we're all cool with that, right?
Quote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 01:25:29 PMQuote from: Hadron on July 16, 2007, 05:34:26 AMQuote from: Björk on July 16, 2007, 05:31:21 AMsame difference. it's clearly wrong.Well it is wrong in most cases, but when it amounts to satire then its perfectally acceptable in my mind.that's different. i was talking about private people. not people in public already who have made that choice.Good that we are on the same page. Some people do deserve to be ridiculed though, so in special cases i would not object to it happening to them.
What about this...
Here's the thread. Though many banned former members can't see it...http://www.wrongplanet.net/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=39332
Right, discussions about MrMark's dick are OK, but discussions about Soph's forum are not. Fucker.
Right, discussions about MrMark's dick are OK, but discussions about Soph's forum are not.