I think the main takeaway is that Pea is a good bloke. Odeon has made some unwritten rules around pea with "interesting" interpretations of old rules. He has been vague and suggestive rather than explicit as to what the punishment of such incursions would be.
If it does sound unreasonable, dickish, authoritarian, dishonest, underhanded, unfair, petty, tyrannical and/or slimy of Odeon. I would disagree with any of such an assessment. I just do not know how anyone but Odeon could put a positive spin on his behaviour or justify it.
I can, in a certain way, see odeon's POV, Pea let his emotions run wild and he knows it and accepts it. But, I also see the good side in anyone, despite what happened to me. I'm wary of people, but, I do not let paranoia run my life. If I do have a spasm of paranoia, it happens then disapates once I get it off my chest. If he asks me to post something for him again, I will happily do so. But, he has since moved on since then. So I doubt it will happen again.
was it something I said?