"If it looks like a , and quacks like a , we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands." - Douglas Adams (English Writer) 1952-2001
0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.
i don't understand why you would have suspicians about what you communicated here?yes that was a question.
is there any other suspicians that you may have had in any of your other correspondance with him or any other moderator at Wp in the last few days?
Feel what you like. Anyhow, I had some suspicions about what Ihad communicated, and checked back at my PM to Alex, in responseto his asking if I desired to be demodded, just to be certain that I'venot said anything incorrect. I stand by everything that I've said.
Quote from: calandale on July 03, 2007, 06:53:55 PMFeel what you like. Anyhow, I had some suspicions about what Ihad communicated, and checked back at my PM to Alex, in responseto his asking if I desired to be demodded, just to be certain that I'venot said anything incorrect. I stand by everything that I've said.This seems to be calandale's standard obfuscation routine.Take a close read of it....... it essentialy says nothing. calandale: did you or didn't you tell Alex about Janika's post? Do you have reason to suspect that Janika lied? (altered the PM from Alex)
I don't see much motivation for either of them to lie.Alex has a reputation. Janicka doesn't. I'll leave it there.
And I should have resolved my problem here with eclair in the first place instead of expressing myself somewhere else. Why didn't I see this place before until someone had to tell me where to take this too. How dumb of me.
Quote from: Catkiller on July 03, 2007, 08:14:45 PMQuote from: calandale on July 03, 2007, 06:53:55 PMFeel what you like. Anyhow, I had some suspicions about what Ihad communicated, and checked back at my PM to Alex, in responseto his asking if I desired to be demodded, just to be certain that I'venot said anything incorrect. I stand by everything that I've said.This seems to be calandale's standard obfuscation routine.Take a close read of it....... it essentialy says nothing. calandale: did you or didn't you tell Alex about Janika's post? Do you have reason to suspect that Janika lied? (altered the PM from Alex)... in three letters or less, please.
calandale: did you or didn't you tell Alex about Janika's post? Do you have reason to suspect that Janika lied? (altered the PM from Alex)
calandale: did you or didn't you tell Alex about Janika's post?
Do you have reason to suspect that Janika lied? (altered the PM from Alex)
... in three letters or less, please.
Quote from: calandale on July 03, 2007, 05:45:53 PMI don't see much motivation for either of them to lie.Alex has a reputation. Janicka doesn't. I'll leave it there.Well, he's barking up the right tree there.
Quote from: Catkiller on July 03, 2007, 08:14:45 PMcalandale: did you or didn't you tell Alex about Janika's post? 1. NO.QuoteDo you have reason to suspect that Janika lied? (altered the PM from Alex)2. NO. I cannot imagine a reason for it.
why is he avoiding this one for so long?
Quote from: McBaldrick on July 03, 2007, 09:13:02 PMwhy is he avoiding this one for so long?I get tied up playing in other threads.I have this thing about getting fixatedon stuff. I wonder if it's somesort of mental disorder?