Interrogate PMS Elle!

[El]

In this day and age, "Immoral sex" or "indiscrimanent sex" =Stupidity = misery! 

Yeah, though sex can be discriminate, monogamous and consentual- hell, even in a long-term relationship- and still immoral, IMO.

[Pyraxis]

Consensual and immoral? What are you thinking of?

[El]

Consensual and immoral? What are you thinking of?

All those things can still be present and you can still be knowingly hurting the other person, at least emotionally.  I think that that's immoral.

[Pyraxis]

Ah - I would question the consensuality of that. But you're probably right, it's better to call it consensual but immoral. If one goes around questioning the ability to give consent of every otherwise competent adult embroiled in some emotional sexual mess, there wouldn't be a lot of officially sane people in the world.

BTW - I must have listened to Forgiven and Joining You at least thirty times apiece in the past week. Thanks for the inadvertent inspiration. 

[Alex179]

You can still have consent and still be immoral is what she is saying.    The other party might not know fully what kind of harm they are getting themselves into, but the person who is knowingly causing the harm would be the person in the wrong morally anyways.  It depends on what is known going into the situation and if the whole thing is built upon lies or not.

Immorality is one thing, I wouldn't attach the word whore to being exclusively immoral.   It is all about money.   If you are in a place where exchanging cash for sex is perfectly acceptable morally, then calling someone a whore isn't such a big deal probably.    A slut enjoys sex for what enjoyment they get out of it, they have sex because they love it.   A nympho is addicted, but really doesn't gain much pleasure if any at all from sex.   Monogamy has nothing to do with any of those imo.   Someone can be a whore, slut or nympho and still be monogamous imo.   We do practice what is called serial monogamy these days.   It is possible to be all 3.... slut, nympho and whore.   

[Pyraxis]

You can still have consent and still be immoral is what she is saying.    The other party might not know fully what kind of harm they are getting themselves into, but the person who is knowingly causing the harm would be the person in the wrong morally anyways.  It depends on what is known going into the situation and if the whole thing is built upon lies or not.

Yeah. I figured that out.

[Peter]

It is all about money.   If you are in a place where exchanging cash for sex is perfectly acceptable morally, then calling someone a whore isn't such a big deal probably.    A slut enjoys sex for what enjoyment they get out of it, they have sex because they love it.   A nympho is addicted, but really doesn't gain much pleasure if any at all from sex.   Monogamy has nothing to do with any of those imo.   Someone can be a whore, slut or nympho and still be monogamous imo.   We do practice what is called serial monogamy these days.   It is possible to be all 3.... slut, nympho and whore.   

What does money have to do with shagging sluts and nymphos?

[Alex179]

It is all about money.   If you are in a place where exchanging cash for sex is perfectly acceptable morally, then calling someone a whore isn't such a big deal probably.    A slut enjoys sex for what enjoyment they get out of it, they have sex because they love it.   A nympho is addicted, but really doesn't gain much pleasure if any at all from sex.   Monogamy has nothing to do with any of those imo.   Someone can be a whore, slut or nympho and still be monogamous imo.   We do practice what is called serial monogamy these days.   It is possible to be all 3.... slut, nympho and whore.   

What does money have to do with shagging sluts and nymphos?

Nothing usually, unless they are trying to be whores.   Maybe they really love sex (or are addicted to it, but can't enjoy it) and have decided to go ahead and start getting paid for having it.   Might as well get paid for it, if you are going to be having lots of it anyways.

[ozymandias]

Consensual and immoral? What are you thinking of?

All those things can still be present and you can still be knowingly hurting the other person, at least emotionally.  I think that that's immoral.

Agreed, good point.

[El]

Ah - I would question the consensuality of that. But you're probably right, it's better to call it consensual but immoral. If one goes around questioning the ability to give consent of every otherwise competent adult embroiled in some emotional sexual mess, there wouldn't be a lot of officially sane people in the world.

BTW - I must have listened to Forgiven and Joining You at least thirty times apiece in the past week. Thanks for the inadvertent inspiration. 

I know, and I would halfway question it too, but you followed my logic on saying "consentual."

You're welcome for the inadvertant inspiration, lol.

[Pyraxis]

And apparently neither I nor the forum spellcheck can spell consentual.

*decides not to apologize for possible accidental sexual innuendoes*

[El]

And apparently neither I nor the forum spellcheck can spell consentual.

*decides not to apologize for possible accidental sexual innuendoes*

I LOVE accidental sexual innuendos; you should never apologize for them. 

[ozymandias]

And apparently neither I nor the forum spellcheck can spell consentual.

*decides not to apologize for possible accidental sexual innuendoes*

I LOVE accidental sexual innuendos; you should never apologize for them. 

Agreed, there have been some priceless ones here!   

[Sophgay]

What member of I2 would you most like to join me in a threesome with?

[vodz]

What member of I2 would you most like to join me in a threesome with?

Pick me!