The Logos is a Catholic concept based on a word that does not exist in the Bible itself.
More than just Catholic. Without it, the Trinity makes on sense, no?
It has to do with the Word of God and it being intermediary between God the Father and humans. The Word of God is a message sent by God and as humans can speak as soon as they think so can a God. Such a God creates and forms the world with mere words (which are basically thoughts vocalized). So if you could silence God, the powers would theoretically be useless?
Sure. IF you can silence this supposedly omnipotent being,
which is of course impossible. Though, it is not usually considered
a spoken thing, but rather the ideal of all that is.
There are no records of Jesus having sex oustide of marriage or being married at all (the Divinci Code is BS).
Actually, that's one of the telling points, which originated with biblical scholars long
before the DaVinci Code, OR it's predecessor, but let's imagine that indeed the
ceremonies of noble marriage were not what they might appear, for the sake of
arguing within the bounds of theology.
That seems a hard thing to believe, but Jesus made it to his 30s without having sex and then died and came back 3 days later then ascended to heaven 40 days later. God the Father still is Jehovah, the Holy Spirit and the Word (Jesus) are mainly extensions of him in my opinion that are there to relate to humans. The Holy Spirit isn't really physical and Jesus was only here a short time relatively and had no sex.
Not co-equal? I thought Arianism was wiped out. Did protestants revive it?
I doubt God has had sex with someone if the Judeo-Christian monotheistic God is what you are referring to.
Not necessary. The point is that the idea of sexual love was
present. Otherwise, Christ could not have suffered,
as a
human. Though, it does seem a bit odd that he could
be without sin, and do so. Always troubled me a bit.