Truth is a matter of your own will? I'm still not even clear on your definition, but it seems to far different than mine that there's no way to argue it. It would be like arguing over the one true pronunciation of the word "read." It's pointless.
It's actaully very simple: if there's no objective truth, truth is a matter of your own will and nothing more.
Which I completely disagree with. If I disagree with a philosophy, I tend to think I just don't understand it yet; hence why I ask people to define their terms before I argue with them.
Imagine that there is some objective reality (for this is, I believe where
most people stand).
What effect does it have on you? Doesn't it only somehow impact
your own perceptions? So, those perceptions are, to the observer,
the only actuality. Anything else is merely a model for explanation.
Now, if you can impose your will on these perceptions, essentially you
are changing the very nature of truth.
