Just so you're aware, the person who describes themselves as Q (the prick from QAnon) isn't the actual Q. John de Lancie is the actually Q. You foolish mortals
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:26:41 PMQuote from: Eclair on May 17, 2007, 08:25:23 PMQuote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:24:12 PMNah. I wouldn't take a family man away.I knew you had morals deep, deep, deep down in that shrivelled heart of yours.I thought it was something else that was shriveled?I thought that's where your heart was, Cal.
Quote from: Eclair on May 17, 2007, 08:25:23 PMQuote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:24:12 PMNah. I wouldn't take a family man away.I knew you had morals deep, deep, deep down in that shrivelled heart of yours.I thought it was something else that was shriveled?
Quote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:24:12 PMNah. I wouldn't take a family man away.I knew you had morals deep, deep, deep down in that shrivelled heart of yours.
Nah. I wouldn't take a family man away.
Quote from: Eclair on May 17, 2007, 08:38:52 PMQuote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:26:41 PMQuote from: Eclair on May 17, 2007, 08:25:23 PMQuote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:24:12 PMNah. I wouldn't take a family man away.I knew you had morals deep, deep, deep down in that shrivelled heart of yours.I thought it was something else that was shriveled?I thought that's where your heart was, Cal. Sometimes it does rather seem that way.But, I have had sex with some peopleand NOT fallen for them. These weremistakes.
No. I just erred and fucked people whomI had no chance of loving. Should have knownbetter. I'm not even sure that I know now.
Quote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:45:23 PMNo. I just erred and fucked people whomI had no chance of loving. Should have knownbetter. I'm not even sure that I know now.is there something wrong with 'just sex'?
Quote from: McFonzarelli on May 17, 2007, 08:46:06 PMQuote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:45:23 PMNo. I just erred and fucked people whomI had no chance of loving. Should have knownbetter. I'm not even sure that I know now.is there something wrong with 'just sex'?Not in theory. It just doesn't work for me.I used to think that it would, but I get stupidabout anyone attractive that I'm with. And, Idon't really like it with unattractive people.
orgasm doesn't work for you!
Quote from: McFonzarelli on May 17, 2007, 08:49:31 PMorgasm doesn't work for you!Mine, or someone elses?Mine, I can manage without anyone.Hey, it ain't the same, but it's no bigdeal.Pleasing someone else is something thatI miss to all hell, but THAT'S exactly whereI end up falling for them. Caring enoughto please is quite a jump for me.
i just cannot imagine why it has to be so emotional.am i missing out on an important part of sex?
Quote from: calandale on May 17, 2007, 08:53:04 PMQuote from: McFonzarelli on May 17, 2007, 08:49:31 PMorgasm doesn't work for you!Mine, or someone elses?Mine, I can manage without anyone.Hey, it ain't the same, but it's no bigdeal.Pleasing someone else is something thatI miss to all hell, but THAT'S exactly whereI end up falling for them. Caring enoughto please is quite a jump for me.i just cannot imagine why it has to be so emotional.am i missing out on an important part of sex?
Quote from: McFonzarelli on May 17, 2007, 08:54:17 PMi just cannot imagine why it has to be so emotional.am i missing out on an important part of sex?It's not just sex. Just being around someoneand making them happy, male or female, tendsto make me begin to fall in love.
this seems to me that you are saying that you like to please, you are a giver.but most other times....when it isn't about sex....it seems that you communicate that it is all about you.
sorry, i have to shower and go to bed.
