For QAnon Shaman to get Parole, the board of officials suggests that The Shaman does 246 hours of community service at an old folks home. Which old folks home? It is unknown at this time.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Most people I choose as friends are non judgemental type people that I could talk to about anything, it's not gender based.
Quote from: Eclair on February 13, 2008, 06:18:58 AMQuote from: Sir_Les_Patterson on February 13, 2008, 04:41:52 AMYour avatar is very sexy. Do you look kinda like her? If so where in Australia did you say you were?No, above the neck, I look nothing like her. Below the neck, yes pretty much the same.However regardless, I am ignoring your 'if so, where in Australia' comment. But I will take it as a misguided attempt at a compliment. Well, if you believe the press in my thread, I am easy anyway...you may as well try and make the most of it. Although I can't guarantee the press is correct.Yes probably best to ignore. Was an attempt at compliment or flirting. I do not do the flirting thing well.The below the neck thing is what I tend to look at when looking at your avatar. Does that help or am I inadvertently shoving my other foot in my mouth?Ummm.....I will quit whilst.........ahead?
Quote from: Sir_Les_Patterson on February 13, 2008, 04:41:52 AMYour avatar is very sexy. Do you look kinda like her? If so where in Australia did you say you were?No, above the neck, I look nothing like her. Below the neck, yes pretty much the same.However regardless, I am ignoring your 'if so, where in Australia' comment. But I will take it as a misguided attempt at a compliment.
Your avatar is very sexy. Do you look kinda like her? If so where in Australia did you say you were?
I only like women for their minds. Of course the fact that you back that up with a nice bod is not a negative.
Quote from: Eclair on February 13, 2008, 04:28:14 AMMost people I choose as friends are non judgemental type people that I could talk to about anything, it's not gender based. Same.It is good to see you again, Eclair.
Why would you settle for less than both?
Quote from: Snidely Whiplash on February 14, 2008, 06:12:25 AMWhy would you settle for less than both?I don't settle for less, however, it's harder to find the two co-existing in one person.
Quote from: Eclair on February 15, 2008, 04:29:22 AMQuote from: Snidely Whiplash on February 14, 2008, 06:12:25 AMWhy would you settle for less than both?I don't settle for less, however, it's harder to find the two co-existing in one person. Hold out?
0's a crappy number, but I have to agree.
Quote from: Snidely Whiplash on February 15, 2008, 06:21:44 AM0's a crappy number, but I have to agree.Yes, but if you lock yourself away at home, it's probably going to stay at 0 for you.
Quote from: Eclair on February 15, 2008, 06:24:38 AMQuote from: Snidely Whiplash on February 15, 2008, 06:21:44 AM0's a crappy number, but I have to agree.Yes, but if you lock yourself away at home, it's probably going to stay at 0 for you.Maybe not - with the wonders of the internetz!
Eclair seriously it is far less about looks or intelligence. THe x-factor. What you see in someone that you can't identify that stirs inside you a binding and indescribable sense of want and belonging that is not identifiable to anyone but you. That, rather than tit size, dick size, good looks or intelligence is worth pursuing.Meh, my two cents.