Ban-dits...

[El]

Hannah's thread has me thinking.  Would anyone like to try and play a bit of a game to see if you can get banned from a random forum as quickly as possible?  I'm thinking you should have to to, say, 50 posts without the ban, just to make it really challenging.  Are there any taker to such a complete waste of time fun-sounding game?  Any ideas for more strict/workable rules?  Should this go in the games forum?

EDIT:  if you partake in this, try not to actually screw innocent people up.  Just piss them off.  You can do the latter without the former.  Jsut ask Peaguy. 

[Calandale]

You can get banned almost anywhere by just spamming, e.g.:


SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM ...

[Pyraxis]

Yeah, but where's the fun in a boring approach like that?

[Litigious]

I was banned from Aspievillage after starting a thread with the headline "Hi, jerks", though I'm surprised it didn't go faster.

But they might've consider it dangerous to ban an admin from Intensity, since we secretely control the aspie communities around the world. 

[Calandale]

Yeah, but where's the fun in a boring approach like that?

None at all, but in a game, the rules should disallow it. There are certainly some who
seem to get a woody doing that.

[El]

Pyraxis is right.  We should have some sort of rating system, all 1-10, 1 lowest, 10 highest:

Efficiency*:
Originality:
Hilarity:
Brilliance:
Overall non-lameness:

*quickness after set number of posts has been established- subtract 1 from the score of 10 for every 5 posts after 50 if 50 is the set minimum posts before the ban, for example:

[Calandale]

Yeah, and have us rate the attempt.

[El]

Yeah, and have us rate the attempt.

everyone on the thread.

[McGiver]

pick a site, any site.

and cal, lit, scrap, peter, and myself will give it a go.



i am just thinking of the recruitment possibilities.

how about one of those anorexia sites.  we may get some fresh fish out of the attempt.

[Calandale]

and cal, lit, scrap, peter, and myself will give it a go.

Don't count on me. I'm not the bannable type.

[McGiver]

and cal, lit, scrap, peter, and myself will give it a go.

Don't count on me. I'm not the bannable type.

i beg to differ.

once you have had the right to speak freely, for a while, it gets into your habits.  then, you go to another site and everybody acts all uppity with you....all PC.

[El]

Anyone want to nominate a site?

[Litigious]

I'm to tired, it's 3:15 AM here. Maybe tomorrow. But I'll guess it'd be better to chose an English speaking site, since almost none of you would get the fun if we chose a Swedish site.

[McGiver]

I'm to tired, it's 3:15 AM here. Maybe tomorrow. But I'll guess it'd be better to chose an English speaking site, since almost none of you would get the fun if we chose a Swedish site.

wrong.

it's them that wouldn't get the fun.  we have you to translate.

[Litigious]

Oh, the Swedes would understand English insults, of course, but you wouldn't understand if they replied in Swedish or discussed it in Swedish.