I am probably making it all up. Only mentally healthy people go on mass killings
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XV4mZi3gYDgwx5PrLwqqHTUlHkwkV-6uy_yeJh3X46o/edit#gid=0
In the interest of fairness, I'm not going to critique it for a couple of days. I'll give you a chance to change it for something better, because taking this down is going to be no challenge at all. A five year old with google could have done better.
It took me about two minutes.
Mother Jones is a trash Progressive site worse than Buzzfeed or HuffPost.
To be completely honest I did not expect any articles to come up. Now, why would that be? Because unpopular or unacceptable or confronting points of view are squashed. Find a Progressive-friendly position and you will find buckets of articles and websites on that Position. Try the exercise with a non-Progressive position....you will struggle.
The only reason I went to Mother Jones of all places is because in their efforts to drum up some narrative (did I read the article? No I didn't) they went into areas unfamiliar to Progressive narratives and being Mother Jones and the Feminist capital they have, they were not buried. So I said "Yup, where is the survey?". A few clicks and I found the spreadsheet.
The thing is that if your whole argument is an "argumentum ad populum" then cool run with that but it does not impress me.
The Earth is flat point out the number of people that believed a thousand years ago? A lot? Was there any truth in it? Were there any dissenters? Were their opinions respected? What happened to their opinions? Do you believe more people believe x = X is the best opinon?
If Twitter is run by Jack Dorsey an avid Progressive and Black Lives matter supporter and he has people like Anita Sarkessian in charge of policing their content.
Reddit is run by Steve Huffman, a Hillary fan and admitted Progressive.
Facebook is run by Hillary and Merkel fan - Silicon Democrat Mark Zuckerburg who threatened to run on Democrat ticket for President in 2020.
Google and Youtube? Same story.
The individual efforts to curate their websites and promote pro-Progressive views and ban or censor views that are not aligning with their own not only supresses information but it makes a one size fits all approach to looking at the world.
Though there may be a concerted collusion between them, I think it more likely they are simply following the path that leads them to similar results.