"People often mistaken me for something that I am not. Does the criticism hurt? Yes... but the best medicine is to ignore, and not give a shit."- Ian Mackalford
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: USS Constitution on December 11, 2007, 02:24:28 AMQuote from: odeon on December 10, 2007, 03:08:35 PMQuote from: USS Constellation on December 10, 2007, 02:23:17 AMIndeed?QuoteWho should run Intensitysquared? (Voting closed: November 16, 2007, 09:54:36 AM)The WC - 9 (42.9%)Elected admins - 0 (0%)The First Citizenvis the jolly despot + crew - 12 (57.1%)QuoteSince just about everyone appears to be fucked off with this experiment in internets democracy and much needed attention appears to have been diverted from fun, games and scoring cheap but amusing points off each other by the interminable squabbling, who thinks its still worth bothering? Should we keep the WC, go back to the previous system, or leave the running of the site to the mighty webmasters?Vote despotism. You know it makes sense. Thumbs UpThree options, fairly clearly spelled out. Now, the only one which made any sense as "go back to the previous system"was the Elected admins.Despotism won, fair and square.AND it requires a despotic actto overturn such a victory. Actually, I'm rather disturbed that you'reNOT following what was the stated will ofthe people. It should be worth a try, to runthe site without any such input.::sigh::Whatever. Can't really say I care about your opinion, now.Good way of dealing with someone being right.Right up there with The idiocy is, that it mainly works.Moving this to your thread...Actually, the reason I don't much care for your opinion is best described using another emoticon. This one:You killed the subject, long ago. You, more than anyone else, were responsible for the demise of the World Council. Deal with it.And no; you're not right. You never were.
Quote from: odeon on December 10, 2007, 03:08:35 PMQuote from: USS Constellation on December 10, 2007, 02:23:17 AMIndeed?QuoteWho should run Intensitysquared? (Voting closed: November 16, 2007, 09:54:36 AM)The WC - 9 (42.9%)Elected admins - 0 (0%)The First Citizenvis the jolly despot + crew - 12 (57.1%)QuoteSince just about everyone appears to be fucked off with this experiment in internets democracy and much needed attention appears to have been diverted from fun, games and scoring cheap but amusing points off each other by the interminable squabbling, who thinks its still worth bothering? Should we keep the WC, go back to the previous system, or leave the running of the site to the mighty webmasters?Vote despotism. You know it makes sense. Thumbs UpThree options, fairly clearly spelled out. Now, the only one which made any sense as "go back to the previous system"was the Elected admins.Despotism won, fair and square.AND it requires a despotic actto overturn such a victory. Actually, I'm rather disturbed that you'reNOT following what was the stated will ofthe people. It should be worth a try, to runthe site without any such input.::sigh::Whatever. Can't really say I care about your opinion, now.Good way of dealing with someone being right.Right up there with The idiocy is, that it mainly works.
Quote from: USS Constellation on December 10, 2007, 02:23:17 AMIndeed?QuoteWho should run Intensitysquared? (Voting closed: November 16, 2007, 09:54:36 AM)The WC - 9 (42.9%)Elected admins - 0 (0%)The First Citizenvis the jolly despot + crew - 12 (57.1%)QuoteSince just about everyone appears to be fucked off with this experiment in internets democracy and much needed attention appears to have been diverted from fun, games and scoring cheap but amusing points off each other by the interminable squabbling, who thinks its still worth bothering? Should we keep the WC, go back to the previous system, or leave the running of the site to the mighty webmasters?Vote despotism. You know it makes sense. Thumbs UpThree options, fairly clearly spelled out. Now, the only one which made any sense as "go back to the previous system"was the Elected admins.Despotism won, fair and square.AND it requires a despotic actto overturn such a victory. Actually, I'm rather disturbed that you'reNOT following what was the stated will ofthe people. It should be worth a try, to runthe site without any such input.::sigh::Whatever. Can't really say I care about your opinion, now.
Indeed?QuoteWho should run Intensitysquared? (Voting closed: November 16, 2007, 09:54:36 AM)The WC - 9 (42.9%)Elected admins - 0 (0%)The First Citizenvis the jolly despot + crew - 12 (57.1%)QuoteSince just about everyone appears to be fucked off with this experiment in internets democracy and much needed attention appears to have been diverted from fun, games and scoring cheap but amusing points off each other by the interminable squabbling, who thinks its still worth bothering? Should we keep the WC, go back to the previous system, or leave the running of the site to the mighty webmasters?Vote despotism. You know it makes sense. Thumbs UpThree options, fairly clearly spelled out. Now, the only one which made any sense as "go back to the previous system"was the Elected admins.Despotism won, fair and square.AND it requires a despotic actto overturn such a victory. Actually, I'm rather disturbed that you'reNOT following what was the stated will ofthe people. It should be worth a try, to runthe site without any such input.
Who should run Intensitysquared? (Voting closed: November 16, 2007, 09:54:36 AM)The WC - 9 (42.9%)Elected admins - 0 (0%)The First Citizenvis the jolly despot + crew - 12 (57.1%)
Since just about everyone appears to be fucked off with this experiment in internets democracy and much needed attention appears to have been diverted from fun, games and scoring cheap but amusing points off each other by the interminable squabbling, who thinks its still worth bothering? Should we keep the WC, go back to the previous system, or leave the running of the site to the mighty webmasters?Vote despotism. You know it makes sense. Thumbs Up
are we gonna have an erection soon?
Like my videos?"Do you care about me?" - a Jman-esque question
ou est calandale?
Coming home to spam soon?
Quote from: pieces on December 13, 2007, 08:52:19 PMComing home to spam soon?If'n it gets interesting.
Quote from: USS Constitution on December 14, 2007, 06:58:46 AMQuote from: pieces on December 13, 2007, 08:52:19 PMComing home to spam soon?If'n it gets interesting.We don't need to talk about rules do we?
why NOT in that way?
