Goldbachs conjecture will need to be solved by a team of the world best, if it is solvable by people at all.
How do you know this ? Are you from the future ? Or do you hold some other form of psychic power ?
Simple, it is just too hard for one person to do. There might be someone who lands the final blows, like in Fermats last theorem, but most of the ground work will have been done by other people, often in teams.
i refer you to the question i made earlier.
Not from the future, do seem to make lots of right guesses though, but I doubt I am psychic.
Then don't profess to know things like how Goldbach's conjecture will be solved.
It may be your opinion, and you may be right, but it's certainly not a truism or 'simple'.
How much money would you put on me being wrong then?
What odds are you giving ?
I am not a betting man, but if you go to a bookie they would give you odds. Personally I would give about around 100 to 1.
Fah. I actually think that the necessary groundwork
is a lot greater than what was needed for say the
four color theorem - BUT, more in a conceptual sense,
and less in terms of data. This is kinda the hunch that
I was working on. There's a jump that has to be made,
and making that would be more than sufficient. I'd rather
leave the legwork.
I haven't looked at the proof for FLT, but still can't help
but wonder that there might just be something which
could be more easily shown. Yeah, I know - so many
men, much greater than I have looked at it, but Fermat
is just not known for making claims like that.