Not erections but fucking was sometimes troublesome.
At first I didn't know if it was the frenulum or the foreskin being too tight. I didn't want a circumsicion and I didn't want to get a scalpel used on my cock, if I could avoid it, so first I tried cortison creams, and when that didn't help, I searched until I found the best urologist in Sweden and one of the very few performing this surgery with laser.
Thanks for answering my questions, really appreciate it. My son had this problem and I wasn't sure whether to ask if it had corrected itself as the paediatrician said it would over time when he was younger.
He said that erections would eventually force the frenulum back over time. I'd like to talk to him about it, and we are pretty open about most things, just think it would be confronting at his age for me to ask how his penis is going!
You shouldn't do anything with it before puberty at least. It will show in time if it needs to be corrected by surgery or not. The principle is very simple: if he can get erections and perform intercourse with it, it needs no correction.
Yes, a random doctor wanted to circumcise when he was around 5, thankfully my paediatritian supported not to. My understanding is uncircumcised encourages greater sensitivity to the head of the penis because it is covered most of the time (hence more sexual pleasure down the track). Also, uncircumcised penises are enabled greater erection length, due to the give of extra skin.
And I guess the only way I knew leaving the foreskin intact would be more pleasurable is I know, if I have a really long fingernail and it breaks the tip of my finger is really sensitive when it's exposed because it's been covered by a nail for so long. Funny analogy, but I think it's true.
He's past puberty now. I'll probably leave the subject alone. He seems to do alright with the ladies. Just would be nice to know if the paediatricition was right and it has corrected itself, because it seems that yours did not.
