Are you familiar with the Paris accord? The one that your hero left? Have you followed the news at all lately? Have you noticed the reports of increasingly extreme weather around the globe this year and the last?
Now, I know your hero's idea of fixing things is raking the forests while appointing a fake climate change panel, but most sensible people think this is not enough. Don't make yourself even more of a joke by pulling another closet climate denial
stunt here.
Well aren't you perfectly ridiculous? Yes I know about the Paris Accord and I know Trump left that. You do not know what "most sensible people think", you may pretend you are in tune with all sensible people but you do not know them or what they think. It is Narcissism at the least to pretend otherwise.
That out of the way, let's go back to my quite reasonable questions I posed to you.
The fact is that there's now precious little time to solve those issues.
Based on what working model are you referencing this to?
Which Climate change modeling has worked thus far?
The answer, if you wish to be honest about it is,
"You don't have one. Not really. You have predictions but then predictions have been consistently wrong and there is a pretty good reason for it. There are many, many elements in ANY Climate Change/Global Warming predictions and if you look at the working models of this and see them failing, you can either think it is because the ideology behind it is flawed, or you can see that this was just bad luck and the next proof is around the corner, OR you can do what I do and say with any model with so many moving parts, then over the short terms there will be so many unpredictable variations in so many aspects that there will be some small differences to the predictions on the ultimately unpredictable model BUT over the long term these difference will ALL be exaggerated. It does not mean that there is NO merit to ANYTHING in the predictions or assumptions that underpin them EVEN IF they end up ultimately being wrong. But clearly the extent of these assumptions and predictions is FAR from clear and on solid ground because otherwise the models would be right....and clearly none of them are."
So what does this really mean?
It means that dickheads like you are stupid and dishonest enough to cling to, not working models or proven claims or anything of any intellectual truth but rather on a smug sense of intellectual and moral superiority and a belief that you are in a crowded rooms of fellow virtuous intellectuals and are patting each other on the backs.
The truth, of course is that you are far from intellectual or moral and deep down you probably know it. You conflate two ideas inextricably because you do not have the the capacity to critique them independently. You can't hold two ideas in your head at the same time. You are an idiot.
