To suggest that her choice of clothing that day was unintentional, an accident, is naive in the extreme. The only question I had was whose idea it was.
Certainly not what I am suggesting. I am suggesting it was aimed at the News that treats every effort she makes and every activity she publicly engages in as ill-intentioned. Her husband says so and I have no reason to disbelieve it having seen how they have treated her up to now.
Here is the thing:
1) If she does not wear said hoody, the press will rip into her, misrepresent and lie about her efforts and smear her
OR
2) If she does wear said hoody, the press will rip into her, misrepresent and lie about her efforts and smear her
Why is this a lesson she needs to learn and what on Earth does she get out of not wearing the hoody and from whom.
PS - Don't say American public because half love her and half hate her regardless and that will not change and don't say press because she is clearly saying that she does not care there either.