University of Florida feminists host a "Bleed In"

[Lestat]

Bog roll is fair enough, since only arabs (or is it certain hindus? I forget which...one lot has a tradition of shaking hands with a specific hand for....reasons related to toilets that you'd rather not think about) have any chance of doing without. And you don't have to be an entitled little snowflake to want to be able to wipe the shit off your arse without throwing away a pair of underwear every time that almost certainly aren't going to flush properly.

And I would agree with tampons etc. being tax free, since, as others said, they are a necessity.

As for the trannys, fucks sake they aren't going to die if they walk into a women's shitter to grab a tampon. I was assuming the trannys in question were of XY karyotype and never had the requisite bits to use a tampon in the first place. But for females pretending to be men, then it isn't demanding that much of them that they go into the bogs allocated to those with XX(or more, but distinctly Y-less) karyotypes having no Y chromosome and pick up a tampon from a machine. They aren't being forced to bend over and stick it up there in full view of everybody, women's bogs have stalls with doors on (hell, its the men's bogs that have a likelihood of a section being present where its all hanging out on full view of potential pervs, since female shitters are unlikely to have urinals.) so these little snowflakes still have the privacy-provisions to avail themselves of in a female bathroom.

Making such a fuss about it is just snowflakery, christ wept, just go in the bog that already HAS a tampon machine, take one and stuff it somewhere the sun don't shine, don't whine and bitch and moan that you haven't got access to needs when in fact the reason you haven't got one is that you have refused to walk into a room that has one and take it. In that situation my snowflake-detector is going to need a new gauge, because the dial just went so far round the metal housing warped and twisted into a fucking figure-of-8.

Hmph...I don't think an ebay warranty is going to cover 'exposure to extremely energetic faggotry radiation' and send me a refund

(which reminds me...I need to make sure that replacement cow is being sent after I got sent a pair [or is that a 'herd' ] and one of the cows arrived damaged goods. I think I'll be able to effect a repair, but not to the original standard and with all the features. Usable for some tasks though, I just need to weld a hole closed in the damaged cow. ) So its a glass half full situation really, I get a replacement for the original and have the pair I originally ordered, and the buggered bovine with a hole it was never meant to have gets a blowtorch taken to it and its fourth arse melted shut. Buy two get one free thats just a bit speshul.

[Pyraxis]

As for the trannys, fucks sake they aren't going to die if they walk into a women's shitter to grab a tampon.

If they pass well enough, the women might flip out. 

That said, I don't see the need to provide tampons for free and definitely not to hold protests about it.

[Lestat]

Oh well, too bad if they do, the little snowflake might just get the crap kicked out of them, and thus, being emptied of all bodily contents, evaporate and disappear:)

And really, since when do trannys pass as anything other than some kind of fucked up creature outside of thailand (where people already know they are fucked up creatures without having to 'pass')

If the place decides to suck up the cost themselves, then IMO not unfair to provide tampons, but in the WOMEN's bogs! men's bogs do not.need.tampon.dispensers. Not unless someone is planning something involving a milk bottle, a jug of petrol and a lighter, but they should have to pay for the tampons, if they can't find a rag. (oh...lol I see what I just did there...I didn't mean THAT kind of 'rag', but since it isn't without some accidental comedic value potential I'll let that one stand )

I mean...alright, you aren't a guy, 'raxy, so you probably don't walk into men's bogs all that often as a matter of course, but for a guy, walking into the crapper and seeing a tampon dispenser mounted to the walls...it just would look so out of place, as out of place as tits on a really thin guy and a dick between a girl's legs that isn't a temporary installation thats mounted on someone else.

It just fits like a square peg in a triangular hole.

Its TAX-free I reckon tampons, pads etc. should be, not GIVEN free to all comers, men included. Since women do need their hygeine products, they shouldn't be taxed. But that doesn't mean they should be free for all comers to just grab a box from the shop and bugger off without paying for them. Just that the govt. shouldn't be sponging off women's money, which has already BEEN taxed when earned (at that, I disagree with things like VAT, because its taxing people for spending money they have already been taxed for earning, which is fucked IMO)

[Fun With Matches]

I have nothing against trannies, I just can’t get the self-entitled ones, wanting to redefine everything in the dictionary, like insisting it’s “people” getting pregnant instead of women, because “men get pregnant too”. Fine if they want to be a transman getting pregnant, but expecting the world to revolve around them is selfish, and self-entitled to expect everyone to change they way they talk for less than 0.5% of the population.

Really, these people should get a life. There are far worse things going on in the world than a lack of a fucking tampon dispenser in a mens’ room.

[Gopher Gary]

 

[Al Swearegen]

  I've always bought my own feminine hygiene products.  Why must they now be provided for free? 

No idea? One thing that keeps coming up is Viagra on the insurance or whatever. However, whilst I agree in principle, Viagra CAN be used for other purposes that gets around its prime purpose of getting limp dicks hard.

That's so true.

My grandma went to the doctor and asked for a prescription for Viagra for grandpa.

The doctor said "I'm very impressed that you have an active sex life at your advanced age!".

Grandma said: "Oh, it's not for sex. I just need something to stop him rolling out of bed".

Was thinking more like https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070711001556.htm but okay

[Pyraxis]

Oh well, too bad if they do, the little snowflake might just get the crap kicked out of them, and thus, being emptied of all bodily contents, evaporate and disappear:)

And really, since when do trannys pass as anything other than some kind of fucked up creature outside of thailand (where people already know they are fucked up creatures without having to 'pass')

Okay Lestat, let me spell it out for you directly.

Like FWM, I have zero problem with transgender folk. I think your loquacious aspirations to violence here are offensive, crude and stereotyped. For someone who's so accepting of neurodiversity when it comes to the autism spectrum and developmental disorders in general, why is transgenderism an exception? Aww poor baby, does it make you feel uncomfortable?

But - I'm not out to support the snowflakes. I think this bleed-in concept is the height of stupidity, men's bathrooms do not need tampon dispensers, and if women's bathrooms have them, it's a courtesy, not an expected thing. Carrying a spare tampon or pad in your purse is female adulthood 101, and FFS use toilet paper or rags if you can't afford it.

[Lestat]

Raxy', you read my intended meaning completely wrong. I wasn't suggesting they should get their arse kicked or they were full of shit for being a tranny. I was suggesting that the snowflakes are full of shit and if they went into a female bathroom and were taken for male, and some girls in the bog did go to town on their ass, if the snowflake did have the crap kicked out of them, they'd disappear, because as everybody knows, special snowflakes are full of it, and once kicked out of them, there'd be nothing left but a wrapper.

Kinda like a sausage, if you took the meat out of one, all there'd be left if a thin plasticy outer layer. Same with a special snowflake thats had the crap kicked out of them. Crap all gone=no more snowflake.

It was a joke, based on that. And actually had nothing to do at all with trannys, bar that they might be mistaken for a guy if going into a girl's bog, and that quite obviously, the ones behind this 'bleed in' who are demanding funding the likes of tampon dispensers in men's loos are a pack of special snowflakes.

Never suggested anybody should go beat on transexuals.

Does it make me uncomfortable? I'll be entirely honest here-I reckon they are entitled to do whatever they want with their own body (as long as they don't use bits of it to do things to other people who want no part of whatever those things might be excepted), but yes, it is kinda creepy. No, I wouldn't abuse a tranny because they are one, but yes, inside it does kinda make me squirm about it. Thats just a feeling that it gives me that I can't help but feel, but at the same time, doesn't mean I will  tell them (the trannys) about it if I happen to see one. I'll still FEEL the same, squirmy, but I don't have to stick it down their throats.

As for the 'bleed-in', that, I reckon an awful lot of people will be made very uncomfortable by that, and it could well be taken as both highly distasteful at best, and offensive at worst. Its just nasty. Why should all the people of either gender have to put up with a pack of attentionwhoring special snowflake SJW types buggering around looking like they are covered in menstrual blood? thats revolting, at the very mildest. And they need to take a look at themselves, realize it, and think 'thats more than enough of this shit, now off we fuck'

As for the violence towards trannys, you really are mis-reading entirely what I intended to convey if you thought I was encouraging that. I was only making a joke about snowflakey little SJWs being full so full of excrement, that if one gets the crap kicked out of them then there'll be nothing left but an empty skin, like a shirt and trousers with no openings (well none of the kind that'd let anyone wear  them at least)

[Pyraxis]

Ahh... okay. You're right, I did miss the analogy.

 

I honestly find it hard to understand the squirminess... I'm bi and androgyny has always had somewhat of an appeal. Weird combinations of gender signals don't squick me out. But I can accept that there's a good chunk of the population that do get disturbed by it.

[Calandale]

...why is transgenderism an exception? Aww poor baby, does it make you feel uncomfortable?

I (too?) have some difficulty with the manner in which various 'trans' terms are used.
Largely a matter of correct language. Since I see gender as purely a social construct,
and transgenderism seems perfectly reasonable - though I'm not sure what that
has to do with what bathroom one should use. That, although also a societal convention,
always had more to do with the sex of the person entering, rather than whatever gender
they identify with. Moving such a determinant to the potentially far more fluid concept
of gender seems strange - although sex-neutral bathrooms always seemed a bit more
reasonable anyhow - it's just as uncomfortable to be using a restroom with someone
of your own sex in the room, IMO.

[Gopher Gary]

Was the "fucked up creature" comment a joke too, Lestat? 

[Lestat]

No, although perhaps I should have worded it different.

To use the term as  referring popularly to the thai sort 'ladyboys' aren't usually too likely to pass on..I'd say close inspection, but read that as closeER inspection than at a distance, as opposed to looking at whats down there, as...err...the sex they..aren't?, as in, you don't see an adam's apple in a woman (one that was mean't from day one to be a woman), or, from the various media featuring female>male type trannies then the voice is obviously higher in pitch, and unlikely ever to  be deep and gravelly, whilst in the case of male>female then if a 'female' has an adam's apple and a deep vocal tone its going to be fairly obvious something is amiss.

And there IS something fucked up about a guy asking to get their dick cut off and a surgical alteration  so that what's down there would need tissue-typing before a potential partner fucked them. It's just as squirrely IMO for a chick to grow a dick, in either  case that could lead to mistakes that a potential partner might make when if they knew about it they'd run and not stop until they'd found some place to hide and throw up. And even if they tell the other person they aren't what they are trying to look like on the surface, still, for the ones that take it to the extremes of surgical mutilation, thats messed up. Hell in any other instance they ban female genital mutilation in civilized  countries not under the sway of crackpot beliefs and traditions (I could say something about religion in the countries that manage to restrain it to a healthier extent too, but thats another kettle of fish entirely) would lead to the doctors doing it being struck off and potential jail time, bar the likes of essential cancer surgery.

For what its worth, IMO non medically unavoidable circumcision of children is fucked up too, and any parents with a religious motive for it can go to whatever hell they choose to believe in for having such things done to a child who cannot say 'no'. And people can say all the schpiel they want about how it 'hardly hurt them' or whatever other crap they come out with, I've a distinct feeling it'd hurt if I went and took a pair of scissors to my foreskin. And of course, according to what I've read, it does negatively impact male sexual pleasure later in life, which is something parents definitely haven't the right to, for their own twisted personal reasons.

I've no problem whatsoever if a guy wants to wear a bloody bra and panties, at least as long as they don't throw it in my face, or a girl wants to dress up in guy's clothing, but when it comes to dicks getting chopped off, female genital mutilations or nasty surprises for other people, there I draw a line and file it under 'fucked up'.

[Gopher Gary]

I have no clue why anyone would make that association to children. Maybe it would help just thinking of them as grown ass adults making adult decisions. 

[Minister Of Silly Walks]

To use the term as  referring popularly to the thai sort 'ladyboys' aren't usually too likely to pass on..I'd say close inspection, but read that as closeER inspection than at a distance, as opposed to looking at whats down there, as...err...the sex they..aren't?, as in, you don't see an adam's apple in a woman (one that was mean't from day one to be a woman), or, from the various media featuring female>male type trannies then the voice is obviously higher in pitch, and unlikely ever to  be deep and gravelly, whilst in the case of male>female then if a 'female' has an adam's apple and a deep vocal tone its going to be fairly obvious something is amiss.

Having lived in Thailand for a couple of years, I can tell you that it is often far from obvious. Adam's apples can be shaved away. Convincing female voices can be faked, or in extreme cases boys used to get castrated for 500 baht by jungle doctors before their voice broke. Maybe it costs 1,000 baht now. How passable things are "down there" is apparently a function of how good the surgeon was - not something I've had any experience with thankfully.

I remember watching one of those "tattoo disaster" reality shows where a dude walked into the tattoo shop and asked them to cover up a tattoo on his lower back. They asked a few questions as to why a dude has a tramp stamp, like did he lose a bet or something. Turned out he used to be a chick. Based on his voice, look etc. I never would have picked him as F2M.

[Lestat]

Well that would make more sense, if they were castrati.

As for tattoos, I don't mind them, as long as they are done well, obviously not the real dumbfuck ones.

Got one myself, a snarling, striking black panther inked on my shoulder, got that done in my teens (when too young, legally speaking), but I've never regretted it. I'd take a pic, but, well....bit hard to aim a camera and take a photo of one's own lower shoulder area blind.