The Chairman of The Dyslexic Society has received an OBE, he was heard muttering "I don't know why, I can't play the bloody thing"
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: odeon on January 22, 2018, 02:19:59 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on January 21, 2018, 08:55:16 AMQuote from: odeon on January 21, 2018, 07:10:00 AMA whole minute spent? Wow, yes, that was a thorough check. I guess you simply missed the, um, selective statistics, then.You are as credible as ever.You obviously did not read what I said and that is okay. I will repeat it again. I had already researched this and made my own assessment to this. It simply was a quick go to after a search. The reason I search was not to find a talking point but because I had previously investigated this. That is why I knew what to look for. I could have used the next entry or the one after that or the one after that. The source is of little matter if you have already investigated the underlying claim. You are not be credible by dismissing sources out of hand based on preconceptions. As I stated, I do not do this. I am interested in underlying claims whether or not they come from people I agree with generally or not. You don't and that is a problem with your credibility - not mine.You spent MORE than a minute but still didn't find anything off with their statistics? Well done.There may or may not be something wrong with stats, larger point is true. No, I spent about a minute. Did you not read or did you not comprehend? Has to be one or the other because I explained it twice.
Quote from: Al Swearengen on January 21, 2018, 08:55:16 AMQuote from: odeon on January 21, 2018, 07:10:00 AMA whole minute spent? Wow, yes, that was a thorough check. I guess you simply missed the, um, selective statistics, then.You are as credible as ever.You obviously did not read what I said and that is okay. I will repeat it again. I had already researched this and made my own assessment to this. It simply was a quick go to after a search. The reason I search was not to find a talking point but because I had previously investigated this. That is why I knew what to look for. I could have used the next entry or the one after that or the one after that. The source is of little matter if you have already investigated the underlying claim. You are not be credible by dismissing sources out of hand based on preconceptions. As I stated, I do not do this. I am interested in underlying claims whether or not they come from people I agree with generally or not. You don't and that is a problem with your credibility - not mine.You spent MORE than a minute but still didn't find anything off with their statistics? Well done.
Quote from: odeon on January 21, 2018, 07:10:00 AMA whole minute spent? Wow, yes, that was a thorough check. I guess you simply missed the, um, selective statistics, then.You are as credible as ever.You obviously did not read what I said and that is okay. I will repeat it again. I had already researched this and made my own assessment to this. It simply was a quick go to after a search. The reason I search was not to find a talking point but because I had previously investigated this. That is why I knew what to look for. I could have used the next entry or the one after that or the one after that. The source is of little matter if you have already investigated the underlying claim. You are not be credible by dismissing sources out of hand based on preconceptions. As I stated, I do not do this. I am interested in underlying claims whether or not they come from people I agree with generally or not. You don't and that is a problem with your credibility - not mine.
A whole minute spent? Wow, yes, that was a thorough check. I guess you simply missed the, um, selective statistics, then.You are as credible as ever.
Quote from: Al Swearengen on January 22, 2018, 02:29:32 AMQuote from: odeon on January 22, 2018, 02:19:59 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on January 21, 2018, 08:55:16 AMQuote from: odeon on January 21, 2018, 07:10:00 AMA whole minute spent? Wow, yes, that was a thorough check. I guess you simply missed the, um, selective statistics, then.You are as credible as ever.You obviously did not read what I said and that is okay. I will repeat it again. I had already researched this and made my own assessment to this. It simply was a quick go to after a search. The reason I search was not to find a talking point but because I had previously investigated this. That is why I knew what to look for. I could have used the next entry or the one after that or the one after that. The source is of little matter if you have already investigated the underlying claim. You are not be credible by dismissing sources out of hand based on preconceptions. As I stated, I do not do this. I am interested in underlying claims whether or not they come from people I agree with generally or not. You don't and that is a problem with your credibility - not mine.You spent MORE than a minute but still didn't find anything off with their statistics? Well done.There may or may not be something wrong with stats, larger point is true. No, I spent about a minute. Did you not read or did you not comprehend? Has to be one or the other because I explained it twice.Bloody hell, man, you need to decide what to blame your ignorance on.
Quote from: odeon on January 22, 2018, 02:21:25 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on January 21, 2018, 02:22:31 PMQuote from: Icequeen on January 21, 2018, 10:10:28 AMUtter bullshit. The Republicans could have funded CHIP months ago. They're holding CHIP funding hostage over their disagreement on the DACA. This is on Trump and the world is watching.Nope, this is a Schumer Shutdown. If you are saying what the world outside of America is watching, I am part of that world and you are not. Are you speaking on behalf of me and from what authority (or credibility) do you do that from?They chose hundred of thousands of illegal immigrants (those Dreamy Dreamers) over hundreds of millions of Americans. Bad choice in my estimation but it was the Democrats to make. They voted for the shutdown it is ABSOLUTELY on them.You're NOT speaking for me.You are not speaking for me....your point is?
Quote from: Al Swearengen on January 21, 2018, 02:22:31 PMQuote from: Icequeen on January 21, 2018, 10:10:28 AMUtter bullshit. The Republicans could have funded CHIP months ago. They're holding CHIP funding hostage over their disagreement on the DACA. This is on Trump and the world is watching.Nope, this is a Schumer Shutdown. If you are saying what the world outside of America is watching, I am part of that world and you are not. Are you speaking on behalf of me and from what authority (or credibility) do you do that from?They chose hundred of thousands of illegal immigrants (those Dreamy Dreamers) over hundreds of millions of Americans. Bad choice in my estimation but it was the Democrats to make. They voted for the shutdown it is ABSOLUTELY on them.You're NOT speaking for me.
Quote from: Icequeen on January 21, 2018, 10:10:28 AMUtter bullshit. The Republicans could have funded CHIP months ago. They're holding CHIP funding hostage over their disagreement on the DACA. This is on Trump and the world is watching.Nope, this is a Schumer Shutdown. If you are saying what the world outside of America is watching, I am part of that world and you are not. Are you speaking on behalf of me and from what authority (or credibility) do you do that from?They chose hundred of thousands of illegal immigrants (those Dreamy Dreamers) over hundreds of millions of Americans. Bad choice in my estimation but it was the Democrats to make. They voted for the shutdown it is ABSOLUTELY on them.
Utter bullshit. The Republicans could have funded CHIP months ago. They're holding CHIP funding hostage over their disagreement on the DACA. This is on Trump and the world is watching.
Quote from: odeon on January 22, 2018, 02:32:37 AMIt is true. Of all the Democrats, it was their top democrat who is at fault. That man is Chuck Schumer.
Quote from: Al Swearengen on January 22, 2018, 02:34:14 AMQuote from: odeon on January 22, 2018, 02:32:37 AMIt is true. Of all the Democrats, it was their top democrat who is at fault. That man is Chuck Schumer.Keep working on that reading comprehension.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ocm28icTWUAA politics of idiocy? That is what 2013 Chuck thinks. He would not do that would he?
Quote from: Al Swearengen on January 22, 2018, 04:02:19 AMhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ocm28icTWUAA politics of idiocy? That is what 2013 Chuck thinks. He would not do that would he?That was a good find.
He needs to watch what he calls a shithole. We're down from #4 (in 2016) to #8 ourselves now.https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/overall-full-list
Most countries ARE shitholes.
This President is unethical, and untethered to truth and institutional values. His leadership is transactional, ego driven and about personal loyalty.