The claim that 'all men could be rapists', aside from the purely mechanical possibility of acting thus due to possession of a penis, is misandry and propaganda at its worst. I KNOW I could never rape a woman. Even someone like faye kane, an autistic genius chick who is, in her own words, someone who really wants to be raped, tortured and used as a fuck-hole for a gang of rapists.
If I were to meet her, I physically could not do it. Even if it did mean losing any chance of gaining her respect. The capacity to rape just isn't something that exists in me. I KNOW me, because I AM me, so I'm pretty well qualified to make such a statement when it refers to me specifically. And I just couldn't do it. I'm not talking about any of that 'statutory rape' bollocks, but the act of forcing myself on a woman is as abhorrent to me as a thing can be. If I were to meet another, I'd do exactly the same thing I did to the last one (who was a convicted paedophile as well), and stamp him into a bloody pulp that would have to be transported to the hospital in a jar. Animal cruelty, abuse of those who cannot defend themselves, bullying, and rape, those are the things that push the big red button in my psyche marked 'do not push', generally because it results in an unthinking, unyielding explosion of brutality towards the perpetrator that just doesn't stop until at the very most generous on my part, serious and enduring bodily harm has been inflicted such as the recipient is likely enough to spend the rest of their existence in a wheelchair, being fed by a tube in their stomach. Once that button gets pushed, the result is invariably a real fucking mess. The red mist comes down, and more red mist is made from what used to be the filthy, disgusting little piece of sewage responsible for said big red button being pressed. It happens very rarely indeed, thankfully. But in such an enraged state, the only way that I'll stop is either others forcibly restraining me or the target being crippled or potentially even killed. I REALLY don't like sex abusers. And there are very, very few limits as to what I will not do to one if I get the opportunity to do it.
If 'all men' are rapists, does that make me something other than a man? I don't think so. I treat most people with exactly the treatment they earn according to their conduct towards me. With the bias set to treating someone well, unless they first begin to treat me otherwise/try to do so. Does that sound to anyone like a man who (ignoring statutory age limits) would ever take from a woman by force? (obviously men are a nonentity in that sense, since I'm not a faggot to begin with). Do I sound like a potential rapist? I know I am a man...but a rapist-to-be? fucking christ no.
Also, duke la cross? I do not comprehend the name-drop. Never heard of the bugger. As far as the court of public opinion goes however, fuck that. And fuck the tabloid bell-suckers who'd host such an abomination. I should know. Its been inflicted on me, when the filth raided me (I was charged with nothing, I should add) and the tabloid media (the sun, aka toilet paper for tramps and hobos when they get truly desperate) were there on scene immediately, so MUST have been called by the filth themselves. 'Trial' by public opinion is out and out wrong, regardless of what someone may or may not have done. IMO the names of all arrested MUST be kept silent and secret until or unless they are convicted of a crime in a court of law. Otherwise the lives of the innocent can be ruined, people could and have got death threats due to the 'court' of public opinion, despite having in actuality done nothing wrong. If someone is wrongfully accused of being a rapist, child fucker etc. and it gets out to the public, it doesn't MATTER if they are cleared. There will still be people who want them dead, and some of those willing to make that happen if they can.
There seems an awful lot of focus on misogyny, but misandry appears almost ignored. It is one rule for one gender and quite another rule for the male. Every woman would get sympathy and assistance, but if a man is subject to the male equivalent of the exact same thing, where, then, are the defenders of the innocent who have been made to suffer?