Oh, so anti-Trump people are the only ones guilty of violence and property destruction?
Yes
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/donald-trump-president-supporters-attack-muslims-hijab-hispanics-lgbt-hate-crime-wave-us-election-a7410166.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/muslim-woman-robbed-hijab-donald-trump-maga-hat-president-supporter-louisana-a7410301.html
Why did you just post this?
Because you were wrong. Or are you saying that they are all lying?
I am saying your lead example is wrong and proven wrong and there are others too.
I think on the whole the anti-Trump ARE the issue. You cannot EVER find a state or moment in time where there are NEVER outliers. Never a time where there are no bigots or vandals or unstable people.
So the "Ha, they are not the only ones" narrative is weak at best and disingenuous at the worse.
The vast majority of the issue is the Anti-Trump rioters. The people like this Muslim girl fabricating stories is not especially helpful either.
I was not wrong Odeon, you are.....again.
Oh, so anti-Trump people are the only ones guilty of violence and property destruction?
Yes
Poor Al. Always ready to look the other way.
This is Odeon logic.
Odeon "Al how can you not be offended by that poor young Muslim girl having her hijab grabbed and her watch and wallet stolen by two Caucasian Trump supporters"
Al "Because it was a fabricated story and the report here proves that she lied to the public but confessed to the police she made it up"
*Smug, condescension* Odeon "Oh Al you just look the other way when these things happen"
Here is the thing, there is no false equivalence and only a moron would think that there is.
Now you MAY and I repeat MAY have equivalency saying "IF Trump had lost you would get the same reaction as you are getting from the Liberals now that Hillary lost" Personally I do not think so because there was not that reaction when Obama won office, but you MAY be right or at least have a reasonable logical opinion.
You may also have a logical and reasoned opinion if you say "Okay OBVIOUSLY most people rioting and being asshats are up in arms over Hillary losing and Trump supporters are all happy and so are not likely to be complaining or do violent acts. Obviously that is going to mean most perpetrators are Hillary backers or anti-Trump people. Having said that, there may be a few cases in the mass where Trump supporters do bad things.
THAT would be a reasonable bet. That is not what you tried to do. You presented this as an equivalency and then backed your proposition with a claim that had already been proven to be wrong and now say I look the other way.
Hard to tell if you are being stupid, ignorant or dishonest. Which is it this time?
You are all of those things, Al. First, the stupid generalisation. Then the ignorant dismissal (did you even read that article?). And finally the dishonest backpedaling.
You're such a sad case.
Okay you are not saying which you are.
That Muslim girl that was the lead story in the article
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/11/10/women-in-hijabs-on-2-campuses-say-they-were-attacked-by-men-invoking-donald-trump/LIE!
That horrible photo of that gay gay that was jumped and hit over the head with a bottle and went to a nearby hospital and needed 5 staples in his head. Its terrible
https://www.facebook.com/santamonicapd/posts/1248837835137297LIE!
That was another one of the half a dozen instances in your Independent article. Are they ALL false? Give me a figure of the number of reports that are real? If you are promoting false reports (and Proven) false reports, I want you to tell me which of the reports ion that article are NOT false claims and how we know that? If not I do not want you being ridiculous enough to think that I would humour articles that are at least a little provably dishonest.
What i suspect IS going on is that there is NO upswing in racial abuse or attacks BUT people (especially Liberal minorities) having lost their political race and feeling a bit disenfranchised AND more importantly, feeling the effects of some ideologically driven fear mongering from the Liberal media and prominent Democrat talking heads, are feeling afraid. Because they are feeling afraid and disenfranchised, they are concocting these threat narratives as a way of coping with and expressing their fear.
Unfortunately a couple of them will get exposed and called on it and they will like false rape claims and any other false claims, make it that much more difficult for genuine claims to be recognised.
You may say, "So you are saying that they are all false? No I am saying bring me an example of the equivalency to what we can prove is coming from the Anti-trump supporters. You bring me a gay guy spreading plum jam over his head and saying he was jumped by Trump supporters and I will bring you
http://wtnh.com/2016/11/12/pd-2-arrested-for-beating-up-man-holding-trump-sign/See the difference?
Now I am not saying for a second that there is absolutely no incidences or evidence of any people who are Trump supporters doing anything wrong but you simply provide me stories in which any that are actually able to be evidenced, are exposed as lies.
I will say it again. There is no equivalence. Trying to pretend there is is dishonest and stupid. As proven above.