Could be Trump?

[odeon]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

[Bastet]

[Jack]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

[Al Swearegen]

It really was and it did not detour away from the policies

[Icequeen]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

Even I will admit it was a pretty decent speech...for him, at least. 

...and then he had to go on twitter and fuck it up again. 

[odeon]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

I beg to differ. It was perceived as good simply because for the first time since taking the oath, his foot wasn't firmly planted in his mouth.

[odeon]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

Even I will admit it was a pretty decent speech...for him, at least. 

...and then he had to go on twitter and fuck it up again. 

^This.

The man has no credibility, so when he does a speech with some degree of coherence, it's perceived as great when it actually only meets what should be the minimum requirements for the office he holds.

[Al Swearegen]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

I beg to differ. It was perceived as good simply because for the first time since taking the oath, his foot wasn't firmly planted in his mouth.

Not at all. If that were the case, he would not have energised millions of people through his previously speeches and nor would he have got through the 3 debates with Clinton as well as he did. You may not like his style (and I find it annoying more often than not) BUT I am also aware that what I find annoying and frustrating is not what others do). By any objective measure, he can't have done horribly in every speech. If that IS the case, he was never elected because he did horribly at every speech and the American Public in their millions did not elect him.

[Jack]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

I beg to differ. It was perceived as good simply because for the first time since taking the oath, his foot wasn't firmly planted in his mouth.

Didn't watch it, but rather read it, so it's possible his delivery wasn't good. The transcript was good.

[benjimanbreeg]

What was the gist of it Jack? 

[odeon]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

I beg to differ. It was perceived as good simply because for the first time since taking the oath, his foot wasn't firmly planted in his mouth.

Not at all. If that were the case, he would not have energised millions of people through his previously speeches and nor would he have got through the 3 debates with Clinton as well as he did. You may not like his style (and I find it annoying more often than not) BUT I am also aware that what I find annoying and frustrating is not what others do). By any objective measure, he can't have done horribly in every speech. If that IS the case, he was never elected because he did horribly at every speech and the American Public in their millions did not elect him.

I didn't say "horribly", you did. But I'll say this: people are stupid and deserve what they get.

[benjimanbreeg]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

I beg to differ. It was perceived as good simply because for the first time since taking the oath, his foot wasn't firmly planted in his mouth.

Not at all. If that were the case, he would not have energised millions of people through his previously speeches and nor would he have got through the 3 debates with Clinton as well as he did. You may not like his style (and I find it annoying more often than not) BUT I am also aware that what I find annoying and frustrating is not what others do). By any objective measure, he can't have done horribly in every speech. If that IS the case, he was never elected because he did horribly at every speech and the American Public in their millions did not elect him.

I didn't say "horribly", you did. But I'll say this: people are stupid and deserve what they get.

You are stupid.  You only believe people are stupid because your TV told you so. 

[Icequeen]

I can't even count the number of twitter
Trumpkins that didn't even know that the "Affordable care act" and "Obamacare" was one in the same.

People had to explain it to them...in very "simple" terms...and boy the ranting when they finally figured out no one was lying to them.

It was sad and funny at the same time. Not saying everyone that voted for him is stupid, many aren't, some just have a different agenda that I don't happen to share.

But dammn, I will say....he did seem to attract a massive number of bible thumping pinheads who where about 3 beers short of a 6 pak.

[Jack]

What was the gist of it Jack?

Most of it was focused on his major campaign promises, and progress thus far made toward achieving those goals. One thing personally disliked was the anecdotal stories; don't think any one person or entity can represent a national problem, or show their problem even exists as a sociological problem, so just don't like the narrow picture painted by the personal stories of individuals although it probably touches the hearts of others. Also didn't care for him mentioning the problems of other countries again, even if briefly; the US has it's own problems to care. Several of Trump's goals are economic and that's what impresses me. Wasn't a trump supporter during the campaign, but he's the president now and genuinely hope his administration is economically successful. Here's the full transcript if interested: http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/28/politics/donald-trump-speech-transcript-full-text/

[odeon]

I love it how people applauded his Tuesday speech, haling it as the second coming. Such a relief for his supporters to have him produce 140+ characters without making an utter fool of himself, just for once.

I bet that Tuesday is fondly remembered now.

It was a good speech.

I beg to differ. It was perceived as good simply because for the first time since taking the oath, his foot wasn't firmly planted in his mouth.

Not at all. If that were the case, he would not have energised millions of people through his previously speeches and nor would he have got through the 3 debates with Clinton as well as he did. You may not like his style (and I find it annoying more often than not) BUT I am also aware that what I find annoying and frustrating is not what others do). By any objective measure, he can't have done horribly in every speech. If that IS the case, he was never elected because he did horribly at every speech and the American Public in their millions did not elect him.

I didn't say "horribly", you did. But I'll say this: people are stupid and deserve what they get.

You are stupid.  You only believe people are stupid because your TV told you so.

Thank you for proving my point.