Hillary would have been loathesome. The pestering and needling of Russia would have set of a cold war at least and I suspect would have resulted in open conflict.
I am sure another Middle East country other than Syria or Libya would have been a target of her insatiable war-mongering. Relationships with Israel would reach new lows. The immigration levels would rise.
The Clinton Foundation all but closed now she is out of office (because it was always about the charities NOT the political favour for cash vehicle) would have done a roaring business.
It would have been 4 years of corruption and graft.
Trump means well and is not leading an agenda that is not transparent. What he said he will do is precisely what he will TRY to do. Which leads to two important questions.
1) Is he able to in putting in practice what he wants to do in theory going to resemble the things that seemed to work in theory?
2) what will that look like and what downsides may come out of doing these things?
What many do is: waste time trying to imply he is stupid, and he isn't; he has ulterior motives, and he doesn't; he is bluffing, he is not; he will not be able to do what he says, and he will;it is coming from others, and it isn't (though its implementation and advise on how to do it, obviously is).
I think the questions above are more important and in fact will be the making or breaking of him.
, and quacks like a 