Brexit omelette with ham and cheese.

[rock hound]

"CELEBRATE GOOD TIMES, COME ON!

Still talking about evil Brexit, then? I did leafleting for the Brexit vote. It's great to know my hard efforts paid off. It's worth getting the greedy fucktards their pay cuts.

And the UK is going to burn? Win, win. So will your one world government bollocks heralded by the EU.

No one tells me what I should believe in. I'll take any fascist Bremainer on - the ones who sit on their arses not campaigning but judge people like me who do do do. Get te fuck out."

 

[odeon]

That's Pea talking, isn't it?

Would you mind NOT acting as Pea's messenger boy, Ozy? Pea isn't a member here.

[odeon]

I am still wondering when they will realise that they need to repeal old legislation and enact new before they can invoke Article 50 without the PM overstepping her boundaries.

Or maybe they already know but shut up about it.

Apparently she been advised that she can trigger article 50, without a parliamentary vote.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-31/u-k-cabinet-sees-no-need-for-parliament-vote-on-brexit-trigger

U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May’s cabinet concluded there’s no need to hold a parliamentary vote before beginning the formal process for pulling Britain out of the European Union, with ministers saying they want to “push ahead” with Brexit.

It hardly seems to matter though. If it is put to MPs to vote, the Tories have a majority. I know that the majority of Tory MPs were pro-EU during the referendum, but it would be career suicide for a Tory MP to vote against "the will of the people."

It's not that simple, according to constitutional lawyers. They need to repeal the 1972 European whatever it was called Act with new legislation. The Queen will have to sign it, and the House of Lords may block the legislation for up to a year, I think..

[Al Swearegen]

That's Pea talking, isn't it?

Would you mind NOT acting as Pea's messenger boy, Ozy? Pea isn't a member here.

No, he prefers being messenger
 I like seeing Peas opinion on things as do others. We are aware he is not a member

[odeon]

That's Pea talking, isn't it?

Would you mind NOT acting as Pea's messenger boy, Ozy? Pea isn't a member here.

No, he prefers being messenger
 I like seeing Peas opinion on things as do others. We are aware he is not a member

Not talking to you.

[odeon]

As for talking to Pea, find him on Facebook.

[Al Swearegen]

As for talking to Pea, find him on Facebook.

We can see what he says on here too.
Or are you no saying the in addition to him being banned, which we all understand, you are making it forbidden (and perhaps a bannable) offence to post his thought from elsewhere on here? 
If so what is the next stage of your moderation creep?
How about bannable to mention his name?
How about deleting all evidence he was here?
How about anything on here you don't like?

How about you talk plainly here? What are you saying to Ozy and is it a wish, request, order and what does he face if he doesn't wish to comply?

BTW Pea doesn't have a Facebook, you horse's arse.

[odeon]

Fucking hell, Al, I am asking him to stop. I wasn't asking you. What is so hard to understand about it?

[Al Swearegen]

Fucking hell, Al, I am asking him to stop. I wasn't asking you. What is so hard to understand about it?

We have all discussed this. He doesn't want to stop and many of us don't mind seeing Pea on here. What part of this don't you understand.
It matters because if you are saying ultimately you don't like it but it's up to Ozy, Ozy will likely continue. If you say Ozy is forbidden and has no choice, I guess he will stop.
Is this now against the rules and are you going to allow moderation creep here? It's a simple question

[odeon]

Since when are you answering  Ozy's questions? I'm pretty sure he can answer for himself even if he is taking messages.

[Al Swearegen]

Since when are you answering  Ozy's questions? I'm pretty sure he can answer for himself even if he is taking messages.

It's a free forum.....or is it?

[odeon]

Since when are you answering  Ozy's questions? I'm pretty sure he can answer for himself even if he is taking messages.

It's a free forum.....or is it?

Trigger is right. You are simply a troll.

[Al Swearegen]

Since when are you answering  Ozy's questions? I'm pretty sure he can answer for himself even if he is taking messages.

It's a free forum.....or is it?

Trigger is right. You are simply a troll.

Not simply, though yes I have been trolling you.. Five months is a long time and in addition to make points I mix it up with a bit of trolling to humour myself. Variety is the spice of life

[rock hound]

That's Pea talking, isn't it?

Would you mind NOT acting as Pea's messenger boy, Ozy? Pea isn't a member here.

You lost that ability to ask that question when I started doing it!   Instead of talking to me, you talked around and over and under me.   You and several other members, who did the same!  Why do you confront me now?   I will not post anything that attacks you directly!  And I will not post anything that I see as a misinterpretation of others.   Deal with it or...............

[odeon]

Since when are you answering  Ozy's questions? I'm pretty sure he can answer for himself even if he is taking messages.

It's a free forum.....or is it?

Trigger is right. You are simply a troll.

Not simply, though yes I have been trolling you.. Five months is a long time and in addition to make points I mix it up with a bit of trolling to humour myself. Variety is the spice of life

And not a very good troll at that.