Honestly I hope he sues them all
Agreed.
Yes.
What happened to not guilty till proven to be guilty? Why is this man in jail? Makes no sense to me. Can he sue the system for this too?
We don't have to convict to put someone in jail. They have to be offered bail in most non-capital cases, which he has been.
But mugshot and name can be in the open before being proven guilty?
And is someone really in jail? Or in custody for a limited time during investigations? What if someone does not have the money to be bailed out? What if investigations take a long time? Will there be any kind of compensation? Or is a person just free game in this?
Yes, an arrest is public record. Doesn't require a proving of guilt before the information is released. They are remanded to custody until trial. They have a constitutional right to a "speedy trial", but most of the time that's waived in order to adequately prepare. In a serious case, you can wait for trial for more than a year. If you are found not guilty there is no compensation.
It sounds worse than it really is. The vast majority of people arrested are guilty of what they are being tried for. The standard for an arrest is rather high. Minor crimes usually have the bond set really low so everyone can get out. The amount required to be released is directly related to flight risk. You are paying money to ensure your attendance at trial if you can't provide what the court thinks is an adequate amount to ensure you show up then you stay put until you are adjudicated.
Is this very different from you neck of the woods?