Parasitic liars projecting their propaganda

[Al Swearegen]

"without repeating yourself"
=
"finally agreeing with me"

 

We can't bust heads like we used to, but we have our ways. One trick is to tell 'em stories that don't go anywhere - like the time I caught the ferry over to Shelbyville. I needed a new heel for my shoe, so, I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on 'em. Give me five bees for a quarter, you'd say.

Now where were we? Oh yeah: the important thing was I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. They didn't have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones...

[odeon]

"without repeating yourself"
=
"finally agreeing with me"

 

Yes, mainly.

[Al Swearegen]

"without repeating yourself"
=
"finally agreeing with me"

 

Yes, mainly.

Another callous specific to these points you have read but are not addressing?

[odeon]

"without repeating yourself"
=
"finally agreeing with me"

 

Yes, mainly.

Another callous specific to these points you have read but are not addressing?

I think Zegh got it right. I did explain my views, you simply chose not to accept them. You think my argumentation is weak, I don't. Etc.

[Yuri Bezmenov]

... and you two thought I was a coward for getting bored of your callouts. 

I just know better. 

[benjimanbreeg]

Can I change the name of this thread? 

[Jack]

Yes.

[Gopher Gary]

Can I change the name of this thread?

What are you going to change it to? 

[odeon]

... and you two thought I was a coward for getting bored of your callouts. 

I just know better. 

A coward? Um, say what?

[Al Swearegen]

"without repeating yourself"
=
"finally agreeing with me"

 

Yes, mainly.

Another callous specific to these points you have read but are not addressing?

I think Zegh got it right. I did explain my views, you simply chose not to accept them. You think my argumentation is weak, I don't. Etc.

I do not think so. I think you are not addressing my points nor backing your own. You are simply repeating yourself and then complaining that you have to repeat yourself. You don't need to. It should be quite a relief I imagine.

You are not addressing my points by repeating a mantra over and over. (That mantra being "You did not read Zegh so you do not know everything he said and so you can't know he is full of shit'). Any point I have raised is NOT instantly struck down by repeating this. It is not a flawless argument and neither is it nuanced or all-encompassing. If you are not going to discuss the points I raise I will make another callout to do so.

As for whether you agree or not, I do not care.