Reasons for Islamic terrorism explained... #tinfoilism

[Yuri Bezmenov]

I posit that "Reasons for Islamic terrorism explained" is that religion is bad for the sole.

Why would religion be bad for your feet??   

Thank you, Pappy - my point exactly. It totally explains terrorism. Give the cranky thugs orthotics and a HoMedics Bubble Bliss and problem solved, thank you.

Typical feminist response. You gynosupremacists all think the solution to all of life's problems is a good pair of shoes. 

[odeon]

 

[Yuri Bezmenov]

When did we get this??   

[odeon]

When did we get this??   

IQ used it in another thread this morning and I just had to add it. cool, isn't it?

[benjimanbreeg]

Benji is doing what all  's do, cherry picking what facts and what arguments they want to listen to.

So because I post a video of him destroying some silly interviewer, I have to agree with everything he says? 

No, but if you're going to rely on him as an "authority" then you have to take it as a package deal. Otherwise his arguments stand or fall on their own merits. In this case I think they fall short.

He is an authority with his knowledge.  How do they "fall short"?  Cause you disagree with them?

[benjimanbreeg]

Its not an Islamic thing. I posit that "Reasons for Islamic terrorism explained" is that religion is bad for the sole. Religion is all about social control, esp in regards to conformity. Religion is intensified if the is an enemy. Therefore terrorism is intensified. Christians and ancient aliens just happen to be the enemy in this instance. How are we going to play it? What we have been doing isn't working so well

It'd be happening if there was no religion.  If you keep supporting corrupted and evil governments, stealing resources and killing millions of people, there's going to be a reaction. 

[Yuri Bezmenov]

So because I post a video of him destroying some silly interviewer, I have to agree with everything he says? 

No, but if you're going to rely on him as an "authority" then you have to take it as a package deal. Otherwise his arguments stand or fall on their own merits. In this case I think they fall short.

He is an authority with his knowledge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority

How do they "fall short"?  Cause you disagree with them?

Yes. After all, that's what you're doing with the videos of his you disagree with.

Are you psychologically blind to the double standard you just used there??

[Parts]

So because I post a video of him destroying some silly interviewer, I have to agree with everything he says? 

No, but if you're going to rely on him as an "authority" then you have to take it as a package deal. Otherwise his arguments stand or fall on their own merits. In this case I think they fall short.

He is an authority with his knowledge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority

How do they "fall short"?  Cause you disagree with them?

Yes. After all, that's what you're doing with the videos of his you disagree with.

Are you psychologically blind to the double standard you just used there??

I just think he's in denial 

[odeon]

I think he's pwned.

[benjimanbreeg]

So because I post a video of him destroying some silly interviewer, I have to agree with everything he says? 

No, but if you're going to rely on him as an "authority" then you have to take it as a package deal. Otherwise his arguments stand or fall on their own merits. In this case I think they fall short.

He is an authority with his knowledge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority

How do they "fall short"?  Cause you disagree with them?

Yes. After all, that's what you're doing with the videos of his you disagree with.

Are you psychologically blind to the double standard you just used there??

Hardly.  It's you both doing what you're accusing me of doing.  Usually Chomsky would be a tinfoil man for you, but now you're suddenly using him for your argument against me, and still both failing to address a single point in the video, because you can't.

[Yuri Bezmenov]

quote fail.   

[benjimanbreeg]

Fixed 

[odeon]

Just a fail.

[benjimanbreeg]

At least you can admit you've failed 

[awiddershinlife]

I posit that "Reasons for Islamic terrorism explained" is that religion is bad for the sole.

Why would religion be bad for your feet??   

Thank you, Pappy - my point exactly. It totally explains terrorism. Give the cranky thugs orthotics and a HoMedics Bubble Bliss and problem solved, thank you.

Typical feminist response. You gynosupremacists all think the solution to all of life's problems is a good pair of shoes. 

This particular gynoequalist completely worships a comfy pair of shoes. However most "modern" gynos (not to mention the Chinese foot binding debacle centuries ago) would give their souls for a pair of torturous spike heels, two sizes too small. 

Maybe your feminatzi paranoia is a reality based delusion based in the footware of the particular women with whom you surround yourself. You might be onto something, Pappy!