I find that such a freakish, weird, inefficient,, POINTLESS way of thinking about something 'even if able to find a different route to solving a problem, the solution isn't right if the right route isn't taken'
WTF. What matters is that the solution is FOUND, at least, ignoing te likes of efficacy of the solution, how practical, costly, possible it is etc. But if a good solution is found to a problem then it should be used. So what if the route is whateverthestyx, if the solution works to end the problem, problem solved, and problem solved=obviously it was the right route. I really have never been able to understand those who insist on incluiding inefficiencies in their thinking 'beacause thats the way its done' or 'thats just the way we do it' or 'things are just DONE that way here', adhering to protocol taken as dogma at the expense of practicality, efficacy and efficiency. Suitability. Things are plastic, fluid, dynamic, in that context, and thus people must have shifting, mouldable values, morals, solutions to problems, logic dictates thus. Hoary old dogmas rgat are no more than superstitious touchstones should be thrown out with the trash if being an impediment to progress.