In memory of those we lost in the past years... this dedication is to you, the eccentrics, the free thinkers, people who made a difference in our lives both in the real world and on the net.Thank you for the memories.
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
I have an impulsive biological reaction of DISGUST, yes, to someone who has posted that his 12-year-old half-sister is "a female pheromone bomb," and that "luckily" he is not around her often. Maybe some of that creepy vibe is coming across when you proposition all these women from whom you feel ENTITLED to a kind and tactful refusal.
Quote from: couldbecousin on November 12, 2013, 06:19:09 AM I have an impulsive biological reaction of DISGUST, yes, to someone who has posted that his 12-year-old half-sister is "a female pheromone bomb," and that "luckily" he is not around her often. Maybe some of that creepy vibe is coming across when you proposition all these women from whom you feel ENTITLED to a kind and tactful refusal.And if you put that into the context of the logic of my argument (instead of utilizing the incoherent, irrational ruleset I criticized), how does that make any sense at all?
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!
Just entirely irrational, I can't argue against so much logical fallacies and avoidance of addressing what I said. What has the porn link to do with anything, despite that there is a guy in it who looks similar to me? The answer is: nothing. I am adult, I watch porn, entirely normal. There is nothing whatsoever here that would make any logic disappear. It is just stupid bias, sorry.My only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.
It makes sense because you are not a dog, and your expressions of your horniness are voluntary, unlike the tics of Tourette's. As for the ruleset being "incoherent" and "irrational," too bad. If you want women to have sex with you, you'd better understand why your blunt demands are not working, and find a way to make yourself more palatable.
My only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.
Minds work with association. Also for most spazzes on this board.
Quote from: 神 on November 12, 2013, 06:37:49 AMMy only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.Her ask away thread seems to give away that you do not respect her boundaries.
Quote from: couldbecousin on November 12, 2013, 06:32:28 AMIt makes sense because you are not a dog, and your expressions of your horniness are voluntary, unlike the tics of Tourette's. As for the ruleset being "incoherent" and "irrational," too bad. If you want women to have sex with you, you'd better understand why your blunt demands are not working, and find a way to make yourself more palatable.What you said makes sense if you assume that it makes any sense to be dishonest about and concealing your feelings, given current social norms, but not if the premise is that people are open and understanding towards each other, just like with other topics, and that the social norms are misfit to that. Which is basically the core issue I raised and which you entirely ignored ...
Given the lack of success you have had with women by bluntly propositioning them, it would make sense for you to take their reactions into consideration and learn to conceal your erection until you've known them awhile, talking about things other than your erection. You know, get to know them as whole people, and not just as pheromone bombs and receptacles for your dick. That kind of patience and maturity might make you more likely to win women over. But maybe you'd rather just rant all day about how irrational women are and how wrong the social norms are. How's that working out for you?
Quote from: hykeaswell on November 12, 2013, 06:45:32 AMQuote from: 神 on November 12, 2013, 06:37:49 AMMy only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.Her ask away thread seems to give away that you do not respect her boundaries. Yes, because I can't help my feelings . I cannot understand her reaction. There was another woman I was obsessed about and I wrote her about it. She was the only one who ever responded to and reasonably addressed it, after which I sufficiently understood her rationale and thus could emotionally react appropriately.
What was the point of apologizing for PM's if you're going to keep sending them? I'm pissed the fuck off. Why should I take anything you say seriously if you can't stand by your words?
I was being emotional again . I am sorry. I think I need punishment or else I won't learn.
Quote from: couldbecousin on November 12, 2013, 06:53:22 AM Given the lack of success you have had with women by bluntly propositioning them, it would make sense for you to take their reactions into consideration and learn to conceal your erection until you've known them awhile, talking about things other than your erection. You know, get to know them as whole people, and not just as pheromone bombs and receptacles for your dick. That kind of patience and maturity might make you more likely to win women over. But maybe you'd rather just rant all day about how irrational women are and how wrong the social norms are. How's that working out for you? It only gives me better knowledge instead of immediate emotional gains. Which is partly why I still have the compulsions I have. Making sense of the world > emotional profit
What I have seen of Py, she is very clear in her reactions. If her reaction is to ask you to stop pm-ing, I can not see what is not to be understood about that. You begging for punishment after that is as if you think you are now in a kind of sm relation with her.