You keep saying it can't make sense. Math is simply coding, symbols that represent ideas. Spend my day working with symbols that represent ideas. When providing others with information, I can't simply present them with my abstraction; they don't know the rules or understand the logic my abstraction. They must also be provided an interpretation they can understand. If I do that for them, they do in fact understand the meaning without actually needing to understand my abstraction. For some reason I think you know how to do that too.
I'm saying it cannot make complete sense when expressed in a language that lacks the vocabulary to explain the core of the theory.
You can still describe the more notable properties of the theory using that language, for example, the quantified energy levels or the wave-particle duality, and you can relate to, and make some sense of, observable phenomena using those basic properties, but the basic logic will be missing because the language required to explain that logic is missing.
Now, if that makes you want to say "fuck you", so be it.
There's a lot I want to say here but every time I try, I feel I am not explaining it properly and so delete what I write. Very frustrating. Sometimes the written languages don't seem to be enough either.