@Cassanova Frankenstein:
I know you are trolling me with retarded logic, but I am responding to this anyway.
What I do understand is that Rage was being protective of DuckFetishGirl, because he felt threatened by my interest (which became more explicit when asking about nudes) in her. I do know that this can happen, also for all other sorts of reasons, but given the circumstances I judged it to be improbable. I expected him if then to be annoyed for me being indiscreet and dismiss the question. I knew there was a higher probability of a negative response than there was of a neutral or positive response. But I valued my interest in DuckFetishGirl higher than the possible effective negative impact (which is annoying someone with a question he doesn't want to hear).
"Do you do X that is not the same and makes up for a bad analogy?"
Probably not.
That which I act upon in everyday life is extremely rational and pragmatical.